User talk:Mincht

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.

Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Roleplayer Good luck, and have fun. --role^player 08:35, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Roland St John. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- gsyhiap (talk) 16:00, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bernard Hesling.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! CharmlessCoin (talk) 01:45, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bernard Hesling article

Hi Mincht. Thanks for getting in touch with me at my talk page about your article. I have gone back to the Design & Art Australia online site and I see that you did write the article, but it indicates that two others contributed so there may still be a copyright violation. On the other hand, please review Wikipedia's policy to see if you can satisfy any concerns in this regard.

Also, I'm not sure I understand what you mean when you indicate you only copied the first paragraph. But for a couple lines here and there, it appears to me that you have copied the entire article over into your wikipedia submission.

That said, as I noted, it may be that copyright won't be an issue if your article does not in fact violate the policy. For instance, it may be that the information you wrote about Hesling at the other site is in fact public domain or it's licence may permit the use of the work under certain conditions. Please read their end user licence agreement at http://www.daao.org.au/end-user-licence-agreement/ . It appears to me that you may be able to satisfy any copyright concerns if you post this agreement on the article's project page and if you provide a link to the licence somewhere at the bottom of the article but that is just my reading of it. You should satisfy yourself. Not all sites permit you to contribute to them and still retain the copyright for your work (you may recall the uproar when people realized Facebook, due to its licence notice, held a copyright over everything they posted on their pages).

If you are able to overcome an issue in that regard, you will just need to provide sources for some of the paragraphs in the article for which no source is cited and then I would be happy to review it again. There is no doubt that your subject is notable so with a bit of cleanup of the submission I think it would make a good Wikipedia article.

Best Regards, Snowysusan (talk) 07:26, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bernard Hesling article

Hi Mincht. I have looked at the article again and you are almost there!

I have added a bunch of citation needed tags. In many cases, the citation is referred to in the sentence and you just need to change it to a footnote style citation. Wikipedia doesn't care what type of citations you use, but it should be consistent throughout the article. You can leave reference to the source in the sentence if you want and just add a footnote reference for consistency and/or remove it from the sentence and only footnote the source.

I have also added some citation needed tags where there is no reference to the source in the sentence/paragraph at all. You will need to add footnote type citations for these parts of the article. Once you have done that, let me know and I will do a final review and clean up of it and then move it to the main space. Well done!

Also, please don't sign your real name to talk pages - when you are writing in an open edit box you will see above a B, then an I, then an odd looking icon for a pen and signature. Just click on that thing at the end of your posts and they will be signed with your user talk name.

Best Regards, Snowysusan (talk) 09:46, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Snowysusan, I have input 'citations required'.--Mincht (talk) 03:47, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brian Penton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joshua Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Bernard Hesling, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Cyan Gardevoir ^{(used EDIT!)} 10:44, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Roland St John Article

Hi Mincht. I have had a look at the article and while it is a very well written article and you have tried to attribute the information to various sources, some issues do remain.

First, Wikipedia doesn't permit articles be based on original research. In other words, all sources must be reliable, published sources. Many of the sources you cite are not reliable, published sources. This policy exists because the reader should be able to independently verify both the information and the reliability of the source.

Sources must also be independent of the subject and most of your sources are not.

Another issue is the tone of the article - it currently reads more like a tribute than an encyclopedia article. One of the core principles of Wikipedia is that articles must be written from a neutral point of view.

If you click on the links I have provided here for these policies and read them, you will see that they all work together to establish criteria in an effort to ensure that Wikipedia articles are in fact reliable. I recognize there are a lot of articles that don't meet these standards, but we work to improve them constantly and where it isn't possible to eventually bring them up to these standards (sometimes there just aren't reliable published sources to support an article) they are nominated for deletion. I don't think you are in danger of having your article about Roland St John deleted, but it does still need some improvement. At the very least, if I were you, I would tone down the language to make it more neutral. If you are quoting a published source then colorful praise is fine because you are quoting a third party, but that type of language shouldn't appear in the rest of your article. I don't know if that helps at all, but hopefully it at least explains why the tag remains on the article notwithstanding your efforts to substantiate the information. Best Regards, Snowysusan (talk) 11:04, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are a quick study - I have removed the tag from the article. Best Regards, Snowysusan (talk) 09:29, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia - Can you pls help. I tried to add a photo of my uncle Roland St John to my Wikipedia article on him, but the photo is distorted! What went wrong? How do I fix?Mincht (talk) 04:25, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Otto Niemeyer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jack Lang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Otto Niemeyer

Hi Mincht,

I have removed the reference for now and not warned the unregistered editor because sometimes that will simply fan the fires. I will watch the article and if the editor persists, I will take other steps. Thanks for letting me know. --Snowysusan (talk) 06:31, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Edward St John.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Edward St John.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of my uncle Edward Henry St John (1916-1994) is from Wikipedia Images of Edward St John (shows many people of that name) but third one along is him. See https://www.google.com.au/search?q=edward+st+john&rlz=1C2AFAB_enAU481AU481&biw=1440&bih=803&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=bZrcUsKhAovOkAWpioDwAg&sqi=2&ved=0CDoQsAQ Not to be confused with Univ Michigan's Edward St John, whose photo shows up wrongly. --Mincht (talk) 03:47, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Conques may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

originates from Old French ''conche'' basin (Latin ''concha'' shell).<ref>A Dictionary of Surnames (Oxford University Press, 1988.</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:16, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Gittoes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rockdale and Brighton-le-Sands. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Edward St John.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Edward St John.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:23, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Mincht. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mincht. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Mincht. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Auto-antonym, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 02:02, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Auto-antonym, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 02:03, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sandtoft, Lincolnshire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epworth. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Konstantin Umansky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roosevelt.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]