User talk:Miss Paris Slue
Welcome!
|
June 2015
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Please do not change the name of the Byzantine Empire across multiple articles without discussion. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 22:48, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
Please stop changing Byzantine Empire to Eastern Roman Empire. There have been numerous discussions on this issue (see here), and the consensus is to use the term Byzantine. Attempting to re-open this dispute without discussion constitutes disruptive editing. You have already been asked once, yet today you are engaging in edit wars across multiple pages. Please stop this disruptive behavior. (@Dr.K.:). Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 03:40, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
If Laszlo says that I have to agree. Sorry about that Miss Paris. All the best. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 04:03, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
Byzantine Empire
[edit]Please stop changing "Emperor of the Byzantine Empire" to "Emperor of the Eastern Roman Empire" on early Byzantine emperors' pages. The general consensus (see here) has been to use the term "Byzantine" to describe the Eastern Empire. --Jack Gaines (talk) 19:09, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Further, you have been discussing the issue, with User:Cplakidas, who has explained the rationale of the policy. So now you return to making these changes without further discussion. Please accept the consensus policy and stop your disruptive editing. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 19:36, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
June 2015
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. —SMALLJIM 20:56, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anastasius I Dicorus. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TL22 (talk) 20:57, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Constantine ✍ 16:05, 17 June 2015 (UTC) This is your last warning. Please find something constructive to do in Wikipedia and do not disrupt it by engaging in a pointless edit-war. Constantine ✍ 16:09, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Miss Paris Slue, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 17:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 22 June
[edit]Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Roman Empire page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
June 2015
[edit]Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. If you continue to edit while logged out, you risk to be blocked and banned from Wikipedia. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:30, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
Please stop
[edit]I strongly recommend you find something else to engage yourself with rather than this tendentious "Eastern Roman" obsession. The reasons have been explained to you over and over, so ignorance is no longer an excuse. Please stop wasting everybody's time. Constantine ✍ 20:37, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
July 2015
[edit]You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 18:20, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Miss_Paris_Slue reported by User:Dr.K. (Result: ). Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 18:28, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
July 2015
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Swarm we ♥ our hive 18:46, 20 July 2015 (UTC)