User talk:Mithdol
Welcome
[edit]
|
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Response
[edit]Hi, Sorta new to this. Is this the right way to post responses? If the reduced image is the 18kb one, I think it shows sufficient detail as I can still make out the words... In any event, I trust your judgment. Thanks. Mithdol (talk) 03:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:2016Yue03MinChuNo1382.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:2016Yue03MinChuNo1382.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 12:21, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Response
[edit]Still new to the Wiki system. The document is a public document, relating to a very public issue (FRAND & SEPs), so it would be protected by either fair comment or fair usage. Mithdol (talk) 04:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Beijing Daoxiangcun v. Beijing Sudao Food Industry Co., and Suzhou Daoxiangcun
[edit]Hello, Mithdol,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username PrussianOwl and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Beijing Daoxiangcun v. Beijing Sudao Food Industry Co., and Suzhou Daoxiangcun should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beijing Daoxiangcun v. Beijing Sudao Food Industry Co., and Suzhou Daoxiangcun .
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|PrussianOwl}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
PrussianOwl (talk) 06:03, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Chinese law
[edit]Hi Mithdol. Very impressed with your article on the Daoxiangcun case. It's not my area of expertise at all (I do ancient Greek history mostly), but I see that you're absolutely right about the lack of coverage of Chinese law on wikipedia. Might you be interested in creating / expanding some of the articles related to the different courts? Regardless, I just wanted to encourage you to keep on editing - you're doing really great work! Furius (talk) 19:47, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Heya Furius. Thanks for the feedback. I'm glad someone finds it useful. I've been tied up a lot recently so haven't been as active as I was hoping but I will try to get more up.
Apologies in advance if the articles are not very deep. It is quite hard to do research on the topic and many things get lost in translation (and I am no translator). Because of this, I figure it is better to remain silent or partial but correct info on an issue than to post incorrect info.Mithdol (talk) 03:32, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your work on the Beijing Intellectual Property Court. I understand the frustration at being unable to get things perfect - but having something is an infinite improvement on having nothing. Furius (talk) 21:21, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
No need to thank. Just trying to contribute to the world in my own way. You're right, something is better than nothing. I guess I could qualify the statements or figure out some way of bringing unsubstantiated info to the attention of others.Mithdol (talk) 09:07, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
Beijing Intellectual Property Court moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Beijing Intellectual Property Court, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 20:22, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Hello, Mithdol. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Patent Reexamination Board.
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:35, 25 September 2019 (UTC)