User talk:Mitsu

59 Club

Thanks for the further post. I have moved the page to 59 Club to correct the capitalisation - you can use the MOVE button at the top of a page for this. :) .A curate's egg 13:10, 13 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rockersbrando.jpg

Image deletion warning

The image Image:Rockersbrando.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go to its page to provide the necessary information.

Thuresson 14:54, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Caff racers

Hello there. There is nothing wrong with being pedantic, it's the Wiki way (tm) If you know about the subject then it is best if you choose the correct title for the article but you should bear in mind Wikipedia's naming conventions Wikipedia:Naming_conventions. The article was never at Cafe Racer so a simple move will be possible, although this may be against the naming conventions for second word capitalisation and should only be done If you think it is the most correct. other options are: Cafe' racer, Cafe racer, Caff racer and Cafe racers but the last goes against the prefer singular nouns convention. If you decide which one is the best and need help with a move (you have to have a significant number of edits to get a move tab). If you think Cafe racer is the best choice then it will have to go to Wikipedia:Requested moves as two edits constitute a history and a simple move is impossible. MeltBanana 16:12, 22 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem RE: Image:Vegandonald.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vegandonald.jpg. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law. We need you to specify two things on the image description page:

The copyright holder, and
The copyright status

The copyright holder is usually the creator. If the creator was paid to make this image, then their employer may be the copyright holder. If several people collaborated, then there may be more than one copyright holder. If you created this image, then you are the copyright holder.

Because of the large number of images on Wikipedia, we've sorted them using image copyright tags. Just find the right tag corresponding to the copyright status of this image, and paste it onto the image description page like this: {{TAGHERE}}.

There are 3 basic ways to licence an image on Wikipedia:

The copyright holder gets the best protection of their work by licencing it under an open content license such as the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike licence. If you have the express permission of the copyright holder to licence their work under the above licence, use the image copyright tag: {{cc-by-sa-2.5}}. The GNU Free Documentation License is another option. Again, if you have the express permission of the copyright holder, use the tag {{GFDL}}.

The copyright holder can also release their work into the public domain. See here for examples.

Images from certain sources are automatically released into the public domain. This is true for the United States, where the Wikimedia servers are located. (See here for images from the government of the USA and here for other governments.) However, not all governments release their work into the public domain. One exception is the UK (see here for images from the UK government). Non-free licence governments are listed here.

Also, in some cases, an image is copyrighted but allowed on Wikipedia because of fair use. To see a) if this image qualifies, and b) if so, how to tag it, see Wikipedia:Fair use.

For more information, see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. Please remember that untagged images are likely to be deleted.

If you have uploaded other images without including copyright tags, please go back and tag them. Also, please tag all images that you upload in the future.

If you have any questions, just leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again. --Viriditas 23:35, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

24 hour block

Kind regards, Nandesuka 04:23, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Removing the "sprotected" header doesn't remove the protection. User:Zoe|^(talk) 04:33, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Vegandonald.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Vegandonald.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Dethomas 00:25, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Rockersbrando.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Rockersbrando.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 16:45, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lewend.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lewend.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 02:46, 16 March 2010 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.