User talk:Moberg

What do you want to say with this edit? --Oxymoron⁸³ 15:43, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry my mistake! I undid it again! :) -Kaddkaka (talk) 15:51, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. --Oxymoron⁸³ 15:57, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Game design article

Hello and thank you for your good faith move of Game design article.

However, Wikipedia policies on article naming suggest that concise names are given to topics. As with "game design" topic, there are no conflicting non-video game design articles; and video game design is the primary topic; therefore conflict does not occur and disambiguation is not necessary. If you were to look at the video game industry sidebar on the article page, you would see that all video game articles are not preceded by the "video" tag.

Before proceeding with additional moves, please bring the issue on the article's talk page or Video game WikiProject talk page. Thank you. — H3llkn0wz ▎talk 22:07, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok :( Moberg (talk) 22:50, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look at my good judgement though! It was moved :D Moberg (talk) 19:30, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Intentional disambig linking

Please see WP:INTDABLINK. Intentional links to disambig pages must be routed through a "foo (disambiguation)" redirect, so as to remove the page from the list of pages needing repair. As your reversion of my edit was contrary to policy and harmful to the project, I have restored the intentional redirect. Cheers! bd2412 T 18:21, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see it as harmful. But if it's along the policy I guess that's how it is. Moberg (talk) 12:12, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Moberg. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Moberg. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]