User talk:MoleseyKid

MoleseyKid, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MoleseyKid! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

- TNT^❤ 20:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MoleseyKid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not vandalised any wikipedia pages

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. MER-C 10:18, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MoleseyKid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Me and GLONDONSM are separate people. We share common interests, yes, but there is no need for either of us to be blocked.

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppetry. You must think we are idiots. Yamla (talk) 11:08, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MoleseyKid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

For the last time, me and Afrasiyab Jamshaod are separate people. We know each other in real life, as if you read our user pages, we happen to go to the same academic institution. I have provided identification, Afrasiyab's can be found at (Redacted) and mine can be found at (Redacted) Please allow us to be unblocked now. I understand your confusion, but hopefully this can all stop now. Thanks, MoleseyKid

Decline reason:

Whether you are separate individuals in real life or one person operating multiple accounts is actually irrelevant - we have a long-standing policy that multiple accounts which behave in the same manner, edit the same articles and use the same device are treated as the same user. See this Arbitration decision. Yunshui ^雲 _水 06:57, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note: I have redacted two links above due to safety and privacy concerns - as the blocking CU/OS, I will be asking another oversighter to review my action for transparency - TNT^❤ 18:40, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

At TNT's request, I reviewed the redaction, and concur with the action taken. —DoRD (talk) 18:47, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that it's irrelevant if there are two different people involved here, due to WP:MEAT. They've both been editing from the same device (allegedly), editing the same articles, and behaving in roughly the same manner. --Yamla (talk) 18:42, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm trying to reason with you here!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MoleseyKid (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As me and GLONDONSM go to the same school, we know each other in real life. We take the same train to get there! Now, (believe it or not) the school doesn't have separate timings for each pupil, we all have breaks at the same time, go to the same room and use **different computers** that, due to being on a school network, have the same network IP address. You have already seen the ID, so please do the right thing.

Decline reason:

The right thing is being done in leaving you blocked. RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:25, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As Yamla said above, WP:MEAT. Lavalizard101 (talk) 13:00, 21 June 2018 (UTC) Also different computers on the same network will have different IP addresses (I often edit at my college where each computer has a different IP address). Lavalizard101 (talk) 13:03, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked. The next reviewing admin is free to reinstate it if they believe it is warranted. But we've had two checkusers and several reviewing admins. WP:MEAT and WP:IDHT. --Yamla (talk) 13:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Arrived too late to act, but I concur with action taken.----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 12:34, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]