User talk:Morgan Wick

Before posting, please refer to these rules to determine if your post belongs here.

If you are commenting on a specific page, use that page's talk page, unless you want the conversation to be private, you're essentially leaving an FYI that doesn't warrant a reply or viewing by other people, or the conversation otherwise does not concern anyone else. Some conversations should not be just between you and me. Some, of course, should, especially if they're not going to be conversations at all!
If you are commenting on something I left on your talk page, use your talk page. I check most of my contributions, no matter where they are. This is the opposite policy from what most other users have, but I believe in the value of actually being able to follow a conversation without switching between two talk pages or not knowing what's going on. (Conversely, if you add to this page, add it to your watchlist, as I will reply here, not on your talk page, unless I feel it's particularly urgent.)
User subpages have talk pages too, ya know. If commenting on a user subpage, depending on the precise nature of your comment, it may be better to leave it on the subpage's talk page.

If I deem a post does not follow these rules, I may refuse to reply and refer you to the rules instead, or move the comments to a more appropriate forum. Otherwise, feel free to leave a message! Morgan Wick 01:29, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! — Kimchi.sg | Talk 00:14, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On WCTX

Discussion moved to Talk:WCTX.

List of CW affiliates

Thanks! Should have thought of that (commenting in) before... I've summarized some of the info on the main network page because I think there may be some interest in how the process is working, but I agree that a list should be primarily that - a list.— stickguy (:^›)— home - talk - 15:15, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The next page title

I remember looking at Wikipedia:BJAODN:The Next Page Title, which directed me to the numeric list at the time, before it suggested that there were titles with more support further down on the page. Days later, after it had become clear that there might have been, I was afraid to look. Which title has the most support at the moment? I'll make the next one out of it. --James S. 06:40, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to violate the spirit of my own rule here and respond on this page (the rules above stipulate that I expect any responses to notes left on other people's talk pages to be there and not here). I've integrated your changes into my section, and the title with strong support at the moment is These Bad Jokes need to be cleaned up to conform to a higher standard of Deleted Nonsense quality. My personal opinion is to move the page we already have to the new name, but I've also solicited opinions at Wikipedia talk:BJAODN:The Next Page Title. Morgan Wick 07:05, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, sorry; I hope I've fixed everything. Sorry about replying here. My talk page says I'll reply on yours. I hope I only violated the letter, and not the spirit. --James S. 07:51, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, yes, moving would be a gret idea. --James S. 07:52, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I hope. Thanks, sorry, etc. --James S. 10:04, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another Hope

Hey, thanks for taking a look at the article from my side of the road and following up on the AfD stuff. I appreciate it. MikeWazowski 05:19, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I was just about to ask someone, but thanks for sticking up for me on the Kids' WB article with the Pokémon airdate. That anonymous editor got on my nerves, I went to his talk page and told him to stop, but he continued. I even BLATANTLY put in the editing description that dates are limited to Kids' WB! and told him to note the dates for Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends and Transformers Cybertron, both which originally aired on Cartoon Network but still have Kids' WB!'s dates. I didn't know how to report as vandalism, so I thank you. Matty-chan 03:20, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TV Markets

I appreciate the mixture of fact and speculation on [[1]]. It's possible the final lists of affiliates will be unveiled at the upfronts, but some stations may take even longer to decide. I look forward to the two new networks' respective launches to see if you were right! Thanks for the interesting comments. :) --Firsfron 10:39, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I actually meant I would replace it with a table tracking the new fall schedules, but I do suspect more announcements may come at upfront time. Given this sort of review, though, methinks I should move that page to a more specific title. Morgan Wick 03:16, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now at User:Morgan Wick/2006 Network Shift. Morgan Wick 01:16, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why there was a need for a page move, as the table seemed self-explanatory, but good luck with the continued additions. :) --Firsfron 23:07, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have broader plans for the original page once upfronts are over. I thought the CW and My Network-specific information was too specific for the title. And it's my subpage, so what I say goes :) Morgan Wick 03:56, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. I was just writing to say I liked it. Carry on. :)--Firsfron 05:37, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty good analysis, keep up the good work. CoolKatt number 99999 03:35, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hangon/hang-on

I didn't realize redirects would work on a template. Learn something new every day. Fan1967 03:08, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, there are lots of redirects in template space. Especially with maintenance templates; {{test1}} is just a redirect to {{test}}, for example. Morgan Wick 03:13, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, as long as hang-on doesn't have what it had before, whatever works. Fan1967 03:16, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Aspergian Wikipedians

Category:Aspergian Wikipedians which you have included on your user page has been proposed for deletion you can comment at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion#Category:Wikipedians by mental condition. The is also a proposal to create an association to meet the needs of users with mental health conditions. --Salix alba (talk) 18:52, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CW Talk Page

Thanks for moving the comments. I think I was just quicker to get my reply in than you were to move it. Then I got an edit conflict when I tried to move it myself. --Maxamegalon2000 04:46, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I figured it out: you submitted your comments before I clicked "edit", then I didn't notice your response, and wound up copying it again, and then finally figured out that your responce was still there and finally removed it. Whew. All cleared up now, though. Morgan Wick 04:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're Welcome

I'm out of college for the summer... leaves valuable time to edit wikipedia! capsgm2002 00:23, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CW coverage updates

95.043%? That's quite a difference from the 94.56% I got. I think I had better entrust you with the coverage updates from now on. Hehe. Gatorman 02:10, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was trying to remove that figure, actually. You want to talk with User:David Levy, I think. He cited a percentage of the "US population", which I suspected, whatever it meant, did not refer to the Nielsen DMA's. Morgan Wick 02:12, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am, in fact, basing this figure upon the Nielsen DMAs. The phrase "the country" is ambiguous (and reads as though it refers to geography), and "U.S. population" was my sloppy attempt to clarify the wording. I've switched to the terminology used by Nielsen ("television homes").

I arrived at 95.043% by compiling a list of the 39 DMAs without CW affiliates, determining their combined coverage percentage (as reported by Nielsen) and subtracting this sum from 100%. Another poster to the rec.arts.tv newsgroup independently reached the same figure by adding the coverage percentages of the 171 DMAs with CW affiliates on a running basis.

Here's the list of DMAs without CW affiliates:

#72 (0.377%) Honolulu, HI

#90 (0.296%) Burlington, VT-Plattsburg, NY

#92 (0.289%) Harlingen-Weslaco-Brownsville-McAllen-Pharr, TX

#98 (0.267%) Johnstown-Altoona, PA

#104 (0.248%) Ft. Smith-Fayetteville-Rogers, AR

#108 (0.240%) Springfield, MA

#113 (0.225%) Traverse City-Cadillac, MI

#116 (0.222%) Montgomery-Selma, AL

#118 (0.212%) Fargo-Valley City, ND

#125 (0.198%) Monterey-Salinas, CA

#132 (0.169%) Columbus, MS

#135 (0.158%) Monroe-El Dorado, LA

#139 (0.152%) Wilmington, DE

#145 (0.139%) Joplin, MO-Pittsburg, KS

#147 (0.138%) Albany, GA

#150 (0.132%) Terre Haute, IN

#154 (0.129%) Wheeling, WV-Stuebenville, OH

#158 (0.123%) Biloxi-Gulfport, MS

#160 (0.122%) Bismarck, ND

#165 (0.099%) Clarksburg-Weston, WV

#167 (0.095%) Hattiesburg-Laurel, MS

#174 (0.086%) Jackson, TN

#175 (0.085%) Lake Charles, LA

#179 (0.081%) Jonesboro, AR

#180 (0.081%) Marquette, MI

#182 (0.070%) Greenwood-Greenville, MS

#188 (0.058%) Laredo, TX

#190 (0.058%) Parkersburg, WV

#191 (0.057%) Lafayette, IN

#192 (0.055%) Twin Falls, ID

#195 (0.049%) Cheyenne, WY-Scottsbluff, NE

#197 (0.048%) San Angelo, TX

#199 (0.047%) Ottumwa, IA-Kirksville, MO

#200 (0.046%) Mankato, MN

#202 (0.030%) Zanesville, OH

#204 (0.028%) Presque Isle, ME

#205 (0.027%) Victoria, TX

#208 (0.016%) Alpena, MI

#210 (0.005%) Glendive, MT

You're welcome to do the math yourself, but I've uploaded a screen capture of my result from a calculator program. 100% minus 4.957% equals 95.043%. —David Levy 03:12, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your re-reversion of my edit (which is why I changed all the references to past-tense). I did not need a long mathematical treatise of how you arrived at your results. Take your complaints to User talk:Gatorman. I do not want any more of this debate infecting my talk page. Morgan Wick 03:15, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon me, but I wasn't complaining about or debating anything. I spent a great deal of time typing the above, and I did so not to argue with anyone, but because I felt that I owed you an explanation of my edit (rather than demanding that you accept my word without anything to back it up). It was my intention to convey this in a friendly manner, and I'm taken aback by your response. I apologize for the intrusion. —David Levy 03:28, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect Rule 1 above applies, then, because Gatorman needs to see this more than me. You should also fix List of My Network TV affiliates. Morgan Wick 03:32, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you two, enough. Thank you for your info. Gatorman 03:36, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Glad you gave an explantion...my math was off by half-a-million viewers. As of right now, there are 104,747,570 households out of a possible 110,213,910. To be precise, 95.040%. Once again, thanks. 03:43, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

I haven't had any interaction with Gatorman. I posted this here because I realized that I came across as a random stranger posting questionable information, and the fact that I initially used sloppy wording (which understandably led you to believe that I didn't grasp the nature of the statistic) didn't help matters. I wanted to reassure you that I wasn't reverting your edit out of ignorance or malice, so I compiled the above list of DMAs. (I previously had only made notations of the Nielsen rankings). Again, I'm sorry if I offended you. —David Levy 03:45, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I asked that you should start interacting with Gatorman, and if either one of you attempts to continue this discussion on this page I'm moving the whole discussion to Talk:List of CW affiliates. The rules above are there not only to slow the rate of growth but also to keep me from being disrupted by the "You have new messages" banner every five minutes. Morgan Wick 03:50, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TV station project

Hey, Morgan... I'm looking at the talk page for the TV station project (specifically, the infoboxes section), and have no clue as to what's been agreed to (or hasn't). Is there a 30 second version, so that I know what I'm getting into before I get into the fray? Thanks! Amnewsboy 07:26, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rule 1 violation. I think you'd have gotten better responses if you'd asked on the page itself. I'm not 100% sure what you're referring to... Morgan Wick 20:58, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WWAC-DT

I think this guy is trying to pull our chain with a hoax here, he added the affilate to the CW list, but the second result in Google leads to WMCN, a home shopping-infomercial channel with no spare UPN/WB/Fox subchannels, at least looking at the TitanTV schedule page. Jersey Shore Communications also leads to a website with no navigation at all, and the article seems to make claims that are outrageous, a Google search with commas only leads to listings involving a burglar alarm company of the same name. The WWAC article copies the new Fox O&O logo and makes claims about WMGM-TV that seem to be very unsubstanciated. I also suspect that WWACArtist would be one of his sockpuppets. Nate 04:17, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ETA: It looks like UncleFloyd isn't really heavily involved, he just adjusted articles for readability, but still looking at things, there are a couple of new users trying to create trouble by creating fake TV stations for fun and to delude people into thinking that WWAC is real. Nate 04:27, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If it's a hoax it's a mildly plausible one; WWAC does turn up on a TVQ, and in the right area of the country too (but not the right owner or channel), Jersey Shore Communications does exist (but the article on it is questionable) and the link to WWAC-TV's web site goes to a real (under-construction) web site owned by Jersey Shore. Listing it for deletion anyway, though. It just doesn't quite add up. Morgan Wick 04:42, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I just thought it too odd to be believed, and all parts of the country (except the other NR's mentioned) are in a DMA as I recall, no matter if they're remote and far away from a major media market. The JSC and WWAC articles also popped up only tonight and were posted as I tried to post my objections, so I can't understand it at all. Thank you again. Nate 05:46, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm starting to suspect that the other accounts may be socks of one another, and of UncleFloyd... Morgan Wick 05:50, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you guys need any further proof, these same screennames actually trying to justify the "James Goldman/Jim Gardner" photoshop job here Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion/2006_May_31. capsgm2002 08:41, 1 Jun 2006 (UTC)

James Goldman (actor)

Attention: You have not placed your readons for Not Neutral Point of view on Talk:James Goldman (actor) page. Given you are a mentally ill person I may forgive you for not placing information for the Not Neutral Point of view on the page. Please fix the problem you have created. Thank you from Tokyo! ShigeruNomi 06:58, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Morgan Wick 08:13, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am not attacking! English is not my original language so I may not have the proper idomatic construction for Americans to understand properly, You admit that you are a mentally ill person on your page and perhaps the problem with your mental status is rhe cause of your poor edititng problems. I am sure in America they have psychological surgeries that can dispense the proper medications for your affliction so you can write in way of normal persons. Please pardon my lacking of full knowledge of American cultures and writings of mentally ill people. Gomen nasai. ShigeruNomi 16:08, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's mostly ignorance of the condition; see Asperger's Syndrome. (It's not like being a psychopath, insane, or full-blown autism, which is the image "mentally ill" conjures up.) The term "mentally ill", however, has significant negative connotations, is not considered "politically correct," and is generally considered an insult. Morgan Wick 22:53, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Much sorry for expressed writing mentally ill as translation is not always good for idioms and cultural differences. Typical American centred people have to make known to all that not everyone speaks like they are from America or are Americans. Understanding culture is not the same for America as Japan and culture needs understanding for peace. I have medical psychological training and know that Asperger's Syndrome is a mental illness not for delusion of saying having it not. Denial is not healthy for being mentally ill and you need to take your medical drugs for reasons of wellness. Thank you and no offense for talking of mental illness for you. ShigeruNomi 23:07, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe that's how it's seen and treated in Japan, but I haven't taken mind-altering drugs my whole life. Morgan Wick 23:20, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

no

Amokolia is a real country look this is a royal heimerith Amokolia 20:53, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bill O'Reilly controversies

THANK YOU for your intelligent NPOV edit on this article. [2] Dcflyer 22:42, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV had nothing to do with it. I just wanted to make it more accurate (and more encyclopedic in tone). Morgan Wick 22:45, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sign...

I noticed you forgot to sign at WPro:TV stations talk. Please sign any comments you leave, thanks in advance. CoolKatt number 99999 22:44, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I left that this morning while trying to get ready for school. Generally, though, leaving {{unsigned}} notices are candidates for minor edit status. I think... Morgan Wick 22:46, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CoolKatt number 99999

I chose to write this here and not on WikiProject Television Stations: see my talk page for my complete view of this silly "feud" between me and CoolKatt. Rollosmokes 08:28, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, CoolKatt has done it: He's filed a pretty-much one-sided Request for Comment against me. I've never been so scared in my life!! Rollosmokes 17:25, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Fine I'll stop CoolKatt number 99999 02:30, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Made a Mistake on the My Network TV Source

Putting on the Source I made a mistake by putting the original Source of the original picture on it. The picture was found on a website I help with http://www.wtta38.com/tampa_fl/images/My%20Network%20TV%20Logo.jpg Hope you don't delete the 3D version. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Timothy Chavis (talk • contribs) 16:16, 14 June 2006

Please see Rule 2 above. Morgan Wick 00:23, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No more room in hell

Thanks for staying on top of the AFD for this thing. These things always bring out the rabid forum members and are thus a pain to send through AFD. Keep up the good work! Wickethewok 04:23, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD tag to Silo article

It looks like one of the Silo fans got too ambitious and the AfD tag has been removed by one of them. As far as I know the AfD status has not been resolved by Wikipedia. I don't have enough wiki experience to know how to put it back in and put a warning in the user's talk section. MDonfield 01:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By the time I got there the page was renamed as well. Use {{subst:afd1}} to restore the AfD notice. I used {{subst:afd1|SILO}} since the page was moved. I also left {{subst:drmafd}} on the offending user's talk page. Morgan Wick 01:51, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The 1990s

Why exactly did you put this page up for deletion?Archibald99 15:53, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: KTVI; Fox Television Studios; WJXX; WTLV; WTEN-TV; WPTV; WTHR; WNAC-TV; DirecTV Group; Fox Television Stations Group; WHBQ-TV; KXAS-TV; ACME Communications; KSTU; WISH-TV; Fox Sports en Latinoamérica; MSG Network; KTBY; Fox Sports en Español

Cleanup: LeSEA; ESPN Classic; CNNfn
Merge: List of Pakistani television stations; KQEC-TV; WEUX
Add Sources: Michael Kay; WHFT-TV; Sandra Sully (journalist)
Wikify: Albert C. Martin; Hubert; Shlomo Moussaieff
Expand: Hughes Television Network; KVDA; List of Super Bowl broadcasters

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 04:22, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HS Senior Userbox

Where can I find the HS Senior userbox? I know you used to have it and you were the only one that did. Thanks in advance for the help.--Dleav 19:52, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User hs-4. Get it before it's userfied! Morgan Wick 18:04, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KMYQ

http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-bin/ws.exe/prod/callsign/prod/mainch.pl Just type in KMYQ. You know what to do. Gatorman 20:57, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would if the link worked! Morgan Wick 23:32, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't work as a direct link -- you have to access the link from within the FCC e-filing page and then click the link to the Call Sign Reservation and Authorization System (CSRS). From there, you query the call letters KMYQ, and go on from there... 68.100.152.9 22:36, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

oh, the above note is from me ... I forgot to sign in. SterlingNorth 22:53, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You know, there should be something that just blares out at you if you're not signed in and you're editing a page... editing as an anon is exactly the same as editing as anyone else, so people who don't know they're not signed in syay ignorant of that fact. It needs to be something that is exceedingly obvious yet can be completely ignored by actual anons... maybe something that explains all the things anons can't do. Morgan Wick 15:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Save Image!

Hi, I noticed that you wanted to delete an image that I did, which I never thought of this site being a crystal ball. I replaced the image with something new, but kept the same name of that image. So please don’t have it deleted. Thanks!! JTB_KY ( Image WBLU.jpg )

Network Shift table

Colorado Springs' WB comes from SV KWGN: see WUFX and WDBD for Jackson: UPN in Dayton is a .2 of WHIO: In Burlington, there's a false alarm called WCWF: and not much else. -TrackerTV 03:04, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

dated linkless tag

Thanks for filling in the date on the tag at Ana Dolidze. It's the first time I used it and I didn't notice you had to do it manually, but I will do so next time.--Kchase T 19:23, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hi

Despite getting off on the wrong foot over at TV Tropes i would still like to be friends

PMA 17:46, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/CoolKatt_number_99999

Hello,

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/CoolKatt_number_99999. Please add evidence to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/CoolKatt_number_99999/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/CoolKatt_number_99999/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, --Tony Sidaway 00:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cw11kstw.png

Nice upload on that. Ok bye. have a nice day. (Xm2631 03:56, 26 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

prod signing

Thanks for fixing my errant sig. on Bobbyist Caliphate State of River Laurel (miconation) - adding my sig has become such a force of habit I sometimes catch myself adding it in places it shouldn't be. Guess I didn't catch myself before hitting save this time :) --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 05:05, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A little help please

"Actually, I'd like to know why Buckner reverted CoolKatt in the first place. Was it because of CoolKatt's reputation? I've said this before regarding BenH: revert based on the edit, not the editor!"

I have to agree. It appears that Buckner 1986 is a sock puppet of Kramden4700, who just reverted my edit of WWCP-TV as "vandalism." The problem is, my edit is not vandalism. Please help? CoolKatt number 99999 04:35, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't the ArbCom say you were supposed to stay out of everywhere except your own userspace and the ArbCom case while the ArbCom case is in progress? And haven't you been blocked for running afoul of that? I'm sympathetic to your plight in this instance but only on principle. I do NOT believe any of the reverters are socks, but it does look like a good-faith if not legit edit. I'll give Kramden a talking-to. Morgan Wick 06:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CW/My table

-Tucson: KWBA affiliated first. KWBA and WBKI are owned by the same company. KTTU will be Belo's only My Network affiliate, in the same way that KMSB-TV is Belo's only Fox station. -TrackerTV 20:15, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

WGN CW logo

It must have been a temporary logo display. I cannot find it either. Many of Tribune owned stations have not yet shown their CW logo, except for WTXX. I know there is a screengrab of WPIX's CW logo as well as WDCW. Sam 07:11, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Found it: [3]. Next time, make sure you notice that it's a banner ad. Those ALWAYS change on later visits to the page. Just remember the URL of the image and cite that. Morgan Wick 03:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and you violated Rule 2 above. Morgan Wick 03:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppets

Something definitely a bit weird about all those sockpuppet blocks. Solely showing "contributions" as reasoning for indefinite blocks. I also don't agree with blanking each of their talk pages either.--Crossmr 15:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refresh your cache

Morgan please make sure you have cleared your cache, your should see at least seven direct cites now within this article. Thanks, Silensor 18:55, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

help me

morgan, what do i need to do to keep my article, ZetaCorp? I need this page to remain, what can i do to change it to the way it should be —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeta204 (talk • contribs) 13:57, 1 August 2006

Why do you need it? WP:CRUFT, WP:NN, WP:NOT, WP:SPAM, and some criteria I'm forgetting are all reasons to delete it. Surely there's SOME other place out there you can keep it. You can give reasons in the deletion discussion if you wish. Morgan Wick 23:50, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(X)

Hi Morgan, what does that (X) next to your delete comment mean? Is it an administrative thing or can any user add an (X) next to their delete votes? --HResearcher 05:09, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Symbol_delete_vote.svg. See also Image:Symbol_keep_vote.svg, Image:Symbol_support_vote.svg, Image:Symbol_oppose_vote.svg, Image:Symbol redirect vote.svg, etc. Although their main use right now is on Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser, their filenames suggest a different originally intended purpose. Morgan Wick 05:13, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re (x2): This reversion

Without question, it has to be CK#99999 attempting to get around his block. I knew he would try something like this. I guess we'll have to block that IP and others if it is indeed him who's behind them. He thinks it's cute, but all he's doing is tightening the rope around his neck. Rollosmokes 06:13, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(taps at Rule #2) Also, this would have been a better URL to cite on the Evidence page. Morgan Wick 06:18, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anarcho-homosexualism

Please consider not responding any further. It somehow boosts his ego to respond. In other words, don't feed the troll. If no one responds to him, he has nothing to say. The results of the AFD are already inevitable, so nobody needs to say anything further. Fan-1967 04:22, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Please don't use icons on AfD. A number have users have expressed concerns about this problem, due to the fact that it unecessarily increases page load time, and causes layout problems for many users. Thanks. --Hetar 05:00, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the icons are there, and they have names like Image:Symbol_keep_vote.svg. So why would they be there if I can't use them for the purposes described by their names? Well, they're Commons images, and they seem to be pretty well-used on Commons, especially the support and oppose ones. They are also used on Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser, for some reason. Some are even used in message banners. I have brought this up on commons:Category talk:Vote Symbols. Morgan Wick 05:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You -can- use them. And in fact, they seem to be more used on the commons due to the different languages involved in that system. However, these is no such need for the icons on the English Wikipedia, and I was merely requesting this as a courtesy to your fellow editors. --Hetar 05:51, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Wasserman

Whilst it's true that a blanking ought often to be understood as a {{db-author}}, such blanking sometimes results from a newbie's non-conversance with editing. Where an unblanked iteration of an article does appear to contain an assertion of notability, I think it best generally to revert to that revision and then, if the topic seems nevertheless to be unencyclopedic, to {{PROD}}. In this case, to be sure—as likely in most where an author blanks a page soon after his/her first edit thereto, you were quite correct to construe Andrewnpeters' blanking as a deletion request, inasmuch as he, ostensibly inadvertently, mistitled the article, having subsequently created Bruce Wasserstein. In any event, your speedy tag seems to have been altogether appropriate, and I hope you'll not have misconstrued my initial reversion. Joe 02:47, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Voting" icons in AfD

Hi Morgan. I notice you've been using icons to illustrate your opinion in AfDs; these icons are somewhat frowned upon by the community, with all discussion that I've seen about them (e.g. here) being highly negative. You might want to reconsider your use of them. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 14:44, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't notice either a) the discussion above or b) the fact that I haven't even voted in AfD since said discussion. Morgan Wick 23:15, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Apologies. Blame the AfD backlog that you're getting messages about it so long after doing it last :-) --Sam Blanning^(talk) 23:28, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's back...

Looks like we have another sockpuppet of Spotteddogsdotorg in our midst...this time he's using the more formal handle of "Mr. Scott Brown". I just cleaned up a small mess he left at KTTV, so be on the lookout. Rollosmokes 16:09, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comparing Blackness to Jewry

I already wrote on one persons talk page. YOu want to refert the article, discuss it on the talk page. This is retarded for you to take a NPOV on a statement that is a comparision between two groups. Im not letting it go. --Zaphnathpaaneah 19:16, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Morgan Wick 19:17, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I, and I suspect JPGordon as well, reverted that because, since you linked to the URL, it looked like you were citing the article itself instead of linking to it, as though you had been involved in an edit war over who was Jewish and thus should be included in the article, and were taking your bitterness to this article. If that was not your intention, read Wikipedia:Links and WP:ASR to avoid future misunderstandings. Morgan Wick 19:22, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Curse of Keith Hernandez

Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.18GB (talk • contribs) 21:09, 10 October 2006

Thanks for history lesson!

Hey Morgan -- On the Child Protective Services article, thanks for correcting my statement, "In 1655, in the United States...." (And I thought no one was paying attention.) Hopefully my ridiculous blunder won't end up in too many elementary school students' reports ;-) Cheers, LarryR 19:35, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Jackson Jihad

Please review this newest AfD, your opinion would be appreciated. PT ^(s-s-s-s) 00:47, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Brothers Keeper

Give me a moment mate. I have to start somewhere!! Gioto 23:51, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You should look through WP:SPAM, WP:MOS, and WP:NPOV. Morgan Wick 03:46, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon the Interruption POV Tag

Could you please explain why you put the POV tag on the "Guest hosts" section of the Pardon the Interruption article. Your edit explaination doesn't make sense to me. bmitchelf•T•F 03:02, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do we define "current"? makes a lot of sense to me. It certainly seems like a legitimate question. Morgan Wick 05:10, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the last sentence of the second paragraph to fix that, therefore removing the tag. I hope it is clear now. It's hard to express "current" because there are limited possibilities for other hosts. If you feel the tag needs to be there with what is written now, please discuss on the PTI talk page. bmitchelf•T•F 05:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Pre-My KDFI.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Pre-My KDFI.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:52, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arden Wohl

please keep Arden Wohl, she does alot for abused children (including making a docmentary which will inform alot of people) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.191.208.99 (talk • contribs)

Frelinghuysen Middle School AfD

I deleted it without even noticing it was from an AfD, it looked so content-free. Thanks for noticingDGG 22:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It didn't even have an AfD template on it? Morgan Wick 23:51, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alansohn

Seen this? Some jerk? Don't be too upset, it's not just you: User_talk:Eusebeus#Just_wanted_to_let_you_know.... P.S. I have Asperger's too. Sometimes I think WP is 75% Aspies. ;-) --Butseriouslyfolks 17:35, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had a feeling. The last time I ran into a guy who created an article at the request of another user, the other user turned out to have a very good reason for not creating it himself, and the creator turned out to be engaging in WoW vandalism. Morgan Wick 17:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request to reconsider your opinion on deletion of Clayton Middle/High School

Hi, Since your discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clayton Middle/High School, I added information from three news articles about the school which establishes notability under Wikipedia standards. Please take a look at the revised Clayton Middle/High School article and reconsider. I understand how discussions can get heated, but I think the bit of work I've done on the article meets your objections and provides a way to end this episode with everyone's principles intact. Thanks! Noroton 16:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Myfox8wghp.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Myfox8wghp.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:29, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Award for You

		The Bright Idea Barnstar
		Whether or not it actually is deleted or not, nominating Blocking of Wikipedia in mainland China for deletion was very bold and an attempt at objectivity on your part. For that, I award you The Bright Idea Barnstar. SU Linguist 14:03, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LACMTA Expo Line

Hey, Morgan Wick. I've noticed that you have been making a lot of markups to the LACMTA Expo Line page. I agree that the article is poorly cited and has lots of POV issues, this mostly comes from the fact that one user, Esirgen (talk) has made most of the edits on the page. You may want to discuss your issues with the article with him. Just a suggestion, I'd like to see the page get better. RickyCourtney 05:54, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Kracht

Thank you for proofreading this article - you are quite right that it needs some style editing and fact-checking quite apart from any translation issues. However, the note saying that the article has been translated from another Wikipedia is one that I always leave, following the advice of other Wiki translators, so please don't remove it. After all, the German article is itself the source - importing the references from that article would be misleading because I didn't consult them. Lfh 10:08, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, coming off the heels of me tagging it as unreferenced made it look like a response to it. If there's a consensus that that's the way to go, maybe a) it should be more prominently declared that citing another wiki, in the case of translation from another Wikipedia, is okay, so that outside proofreaders like me don't hunt around for POV and citation problems, and b) there should be a template similar to the one for the 1911 Encyclopedia Brittanica for your message. Morgan Wick 17:33, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can see how it would have seemed like a direct response - sorry about that. In any case I'm going to have a look now at the official policies on citing references for translations - if we have any - since it's important and I confess I haven't researched the issue very much. Lfh 18:53, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Section

I just wanted to make sure you realized that I pointed you to the wrong section of the article on the Template creation page. Jmfangio| ►Chat 20:44, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, If 30 isn't the best, should i move to RFC or is there another step i need to take first? Jmfangio| ►Chat 07:31, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:DR. Morgan Wick 19:20, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NFLactive survey

As you commented during the 30, a statement of your stance would be appreciated. If you feel you are well versed on the "Pro Bowl Debate", please vote at Template_talk:Infobox_NFLactive#Survey.Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat 21:47, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

As you were involved in 30 request closely related, I felt you should be notified Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Chrisjnelson Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat 03:29, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

I didn't see that you had added back the edit. In the future, it would be nice if you engaged in dialogue with me and not your edit summary. Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 07:32, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Updated subpage

Hi, I removed a wikilink from KUPN in your Morgan Wick/2006 Network Shift subpage. Normally, I don't edit other people's user talk pages, unless adding a comment, but the station changed its call sign last month, and I was removing links to the old page. If this is a problem for you, then please accept my apologies. dhett ^{(talk • contribs)} 05:18, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

notification

Per the GFDL terms, you have lost all rights to your Wikipedia is not a newspaper essay. I have copied much of it in Wikipedia is not TV. Thank you for your efforts of 2 years ago. 903M (talk) 04:45, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Asperger Syndrome

Hi there. I am HPJoker and was looking at random stuff and one thing let to another and i came across the number 10,001 and saw all the nom per Morgan Wick and decided to check out who you were. I am confused to what the effects Asperger Syndrome are. Would you mind telling me? Thank you. HPJoker ^{Leave me a message} 08:44, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, let me try and decipher your message to the best of my ability... are you looking for info on Asperger Syndrome in general, or in my case? If in general, I can't do any better than to point you to Wikipedia's own article on Asperger's Syndrome; if in my specific case, I would start here and if you need to know more, looking through the posts on my blog tagged "about me", although that might give you a distorted picture. Morgan Wick (talk) 04:19, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Meetup/Seattle6, a focus group

Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington (Seattle campus), and my group is reaching out to Wikipedians in the Puget Sound area. We're hosting a focus group designed to gather information on what Wikipedians would like to know about each other when interacting on Wikipedia. Our end goal is to create an embedded application that helps people quickly know more about others' history and activity on Wikipedia, and we feel our design will be much more useful if it's based on insights of users like you.

I'm hoping that the chance to help out local researchers, to engage in lively face-to-face discussion with other Seattle Wikipedians, and to contribute to Wikipedia in a new way will entice you to join us. The session lasts 2 hours and snacks are provided. Sessions will be held on UW Seattle campus - directions will be sent after registration. Your contribution will be greatly appreciated!

Willing and able to help us out? RSVP here. Want to know more? Visit our user talk page . Please help us contact other local Wikipedians, too! Commprac01 (talk) 01:54, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Network Shift

I saw your network shift and I did a Affiliate list if The CW rebranded as UPN in the future came back with WB web series --Meteorman7228 (talk) 21:31, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

In this issue:

Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
Research: The most recent DR data
Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->

--The Olive Branch 19:18, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WLYH-TV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WPHL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited KOMO-TV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Doctors (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to C-SPAN

Hi there, Morgan Wick. I have the C-SPAN article on my watchlist as I'm currently trying to work through the FAC process for this article, and I noticed your recent edit from the 21st. I wanted to point out tthat this fact is repeated in the Audience section where it is supported by this U.S. News & World Report source.

As I interpret WP:LEADCITE a citation is not strictly necessary in the introduction, unless you feel strongly that this fact is likely to be challenged. Based on this fact's inclusion in the body of the article I think removing the {{fact}} tag would be appropriate. (For your convenience: the ref tag <ref name=Bedard/> corresponds to the U.S. News & World Report article.)

I would correct this citation issue myself, however I am a consultant to C-SPAN and have been working via Talk and WikiProject pages on their behalf to improve this article, and others related to C-SPAN. As a paid advocate I follow Jimbo's advisory to COI editors (explained in his Paid Advocacy FAQ) that I shouldl avoid all direct edits to articles. Also, I know you prefer this sort of message on article Talk, but I figured this one really did relate to you most.

I'll keep an eye on your Talk page for any replies, but I hope you're able to help me address this tag. Cheers, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 01:17, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, Morgan. This has been handled by another editor, so you can disregard the above message. Cheers, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 17:02, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CW Virginia

Thankyou for your fix to this - the change to "Colony of Virginia" had nothing to do with my user name and everything to do with a regex left over from some previous work, that I'd forgotten to disable. I've reinstated the sensible part of my change. Colonies Chris (talk) 08:29, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seattle Wiknic 2015

In the Seattle area? You are invited to the Seattle Wiknic 2015 on Sunday, July 5, 2015, 11am to 2pm at the Washington Park Arboretum, in the meadow area to the south of the Graham Visitors Center, approximately at 47°38′15″N 122°17′38″W / 47.637435°N 122.293986°W. Click here for more details!

Meetup to revitalize & prioritize WikiProject Seattle

In the Seattle area? Edit Wikipedia or Wikimedia sister projects? You are invited to help. Come to our first Meetup to revitalize & prioritize WikiProject Seattle on July 27, 2015, 6pm to 9pm, at Café Allegro

Yours, Peaceray

To unsubscribe from future messages from Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list. -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Lab at the UW Research Commons

	What:	Wikipedia Lab
	When:	Weekly on Mondays, starting 10/5/2015 through 11/30/2015, 4:30pm-6:30pm
	Who:	UW students, faculty, and staff; Wikimedians; Seattle community members
	Where:	UW Research Commons
	Focus:	Women and the Sciences in October and Pacific Northwest in November; weekly topics
	Wikipedia Lab at the UW Libraries Research Commons brings together local Wikipedia experts with University of Washington subject specialists and UW community members to learn about editing Wikipedia. Come contribute vital, local, and corrective content to the world's largest online encyclopedia. Come as you are with questions, ideas, or content knowledge to share! The Wikipedia Lab will run weekly, every Monday, during fall quarter. The Lab has two thematic focuses: Women in the Sciences and the Pacific Northwest. Each week will feature a special collections librarian content specialist and Wikipedian editors. Sponsored by the UW Libraries & Wikimedians User Group

To unsubscribe from future messages from Wikipedia:Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:17, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Morgan Wick. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Morgan Wick. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Morgan Wick! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:19, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pre-My KDFI.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pre-My KDFI.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 17:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]