User talk:Mouchkjhh

August 2024

Your recent editing history at Joseph Stalin shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thedarkknightli (talk) 00:56, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm REDACTED403. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Floriano Peixoto seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -REDACTED403 (talk) 03:36, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Floriano Peixoto. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. -REDACTED403 (talk) 03:42, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Joseph Stalin did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Marcus Markup (talk) 17:48, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ani

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruptive edits in politics-related articles. Thank you. Thedarkknightli (talk) 04:48, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain areas of Wikipedia for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Johnuniq (talk) 03:30, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mouchkjhh: Repeating edits that have been reverted is edit warring and is not permitted for reasons that should be obvious. To avoid further disruption, you are currently unable to edit articles but can comment on talk pages such as Talk:Joseph Stalin or the above ANI link. To be unblocked, please reply here and indicate that you will not repeat contested edits. Questions can be asked at WP:Teahouse. Johnuniq (talk) 03:30, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

It appears that you are now engaging in block evasion using IP addresses - compare diff by User:Mouchkjhh to diff by IP 1, and diff by IP 2. Evading your block like this will only make it harder to appeal the block on your account, and instances of block evasion like this will result in pages you edit being protected and the IP addresses you use also being blocked.

Pinging @Johnuniq to let them know of the block evasion. — AP 499D25 (talk) 00:22, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked 138.117.236.149 and 45.239.238.7 for a week. Johnuniq (talk) 02:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And a couple more: 2804:D4B:9A11:9C00:D114:1F88:71B2:B679; 2804:D4B:9A11:9C00:C849:4398:8EF7:4F8E. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ybsone (talk • contribs) 15:51, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Johnuniq (talk) 01:37, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Johnuniq, I've just protected the Cali Cartel article because of continued block evasion. Looks like this user is beyond redemption. Favonian (talk) 18:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

More: 201.50.133.95 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) GA-RT-22 (talk) 19:53, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not familiar with the details of this situation and would need diffs or other brief explanation before blocking an IP. Johnuniq (talk) 03:45, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnuniq: There is evidence on one page they edited, compare:

diff 1 and diff 2 by 201.50.133.95 (current IP)
diff 1 and diff 2 by 45.239.238.7 (previous IP)
diff 1 and diff 2 by User:Mouchkjhh

This current IP is still being used as of today. — AP 499D25 (talk) 04:40, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I blocked 201.50.133.95 for a month. Johnuniq (talk) 05:31, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Meu bloqueio

meu bloqueio foi injusto, eu apenas estava corrigindo coisas que estavam eradas em páginas. Por esse motivo eu peço o meu desbloqueio. Mouchkjhh (talk) 18:54, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the English Wikipedia, you'll need to communicate in English for other people to read what you say. — AP 499D25 (talk) 04:40, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Translation: "My block was unjust, I was only correcting things that were wrong on pages. For this motive I request my unblock. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.21.199.174 (talk) 12:26, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

O seu aviso de bloqueio clarifica: "Ser desbloqueado, por favor responder aqui e mostrar entendimento do assunto." Não utilise IPs antes de uma resolução. 92.21.199.174 (talk) 12:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]