User talk:MrSuperEditor123

March 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ian Karmel has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ian Karmel was changed by MrSuperEditor123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.945198 on 2016-03-06T19:16:26+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:16, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ian Karmel with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:30, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Lovely Warren

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lovely Warren, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:39, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to The Man in the High Castle (TV series) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 22:43, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Otherkin. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Deacon Vorbis (talk) 04:25, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Deacon Vorbis. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Deacon Vorbis (talk) 16:59, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Soros' v. Soros's

The latter is wp:British English. Don't remember the policy on this... Jim1138 (talk) 23:46, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, MrSuperEditor123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 23:46, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.