User talk:Namerst

This is Namerst's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dmitry Green (October 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Frayae was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dmitry Green and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dmitry Green, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 19:40, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Namerst! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 19:40, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

95.153.129.253 (talk) 13:49, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Help please post this article on Wikipedia. Thank you very much.95.153.129.253 (talk) 13:49, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dmitry Green moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dmitry Green, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 19:13, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dmitry Green moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dmitry Green, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 14:13, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of IQDEMY

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on IQDEMY, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Daiyusha (talk) 09:14, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, Namerst. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 09:58, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dmitry Green (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dmitry Green and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dmitry Green, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:51, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Dmitry Green a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Dmitry Green. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 09:09, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of IQDEMY

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on IQDEMY, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cabayi (talk) 09:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding IQDEMY

IQDEMY has no mention outside of sources directly related to printing industry. When its mentioned in notable newspapers, then it could have an article, but not now.Please dont create a page on it Daiyusha (talk) 13:28, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Irina Barzhak

Hello Namerst,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Irina Barzhak for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 18:56, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dmitry Green for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dmitry Green is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dmitry Green until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 07:20, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Zillion (online platform)

Hello, Namerst,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Elmidae and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Zillion (online platform) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zillion (online platform) .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Elmidae}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:23, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nadin Serovski for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nadin Serovski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nadin Serovski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 15:13, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of World of Boxing for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World of Boxing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World of Boxing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 19:30, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Namerst

Thank you for creating World of Boxing.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Was already at AFD when I reviewed it.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 12:16, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rafael Mikhailovich Minasbekyan

Hello Namerst,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rafael Mikhailovich Minasbekyan for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks! Ț Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

—Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 05:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

I am concerned about several aspects of your editing history, including, but not restricted to, the remarkably high proportion of your editing which has been deleted, the unmistakably promotional tone of much of your editing, and the fact that on occasion you have posted text unmistakably written by or on behalf of the business it was about. (That could mean either that you posted it to Wikipedia on their behalf or that you copied text from somewhere else and posted it to Wikipedia.) Please help me to sort out what the causes of these problems are by telling me the following.

Are you paid to edit Wikipedia? If so, by whom?
Have you ever made edits because one or more other people have asked you or told you to do so?
Have you ever posted writing to Wikipedia which you have copied from somewhere else? If so, where have you copied it from? JBW (talk) 20:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.

No, I don't get paid to write articles.
No, nobody asks me to create articles.
No, I write all the texts myself.

Sorry, I will be working on the presentation style of the articles. Namerst (talk) 09:26, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 18:57, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Namerst (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. The second user was used by my relative, with whom I live together. I don’t write articles for money! I have no conflict of interest with these people and companies. You've moved a lot of my articles to drafts, but they are significant. You also mentioned that the articles were written for money, but this is not true! Also why were my articles moved to draft? For example, the article aviasales.ru. I translated it from the Russian Wikipedia, where it had the status of a good article. Why do you see ads there? Please pay attention @Rosguill: to this issue. Also, all my articles were meaningful and were not advertising. I am ready to discuss this. Previously, my articles were deleted because they were not significant. I didn't know the rules very well then. Now I only write meaningful articles. I have different interests, I write about media personalities, singers, artists, I write about companies that are very famous. I am very sorry that I am unreasonably blocked and my articles are transferred to draft. And I don't have any relationship with these people, I don't get any money, I contribute to Wikipedia for free!Namerst (talk) 06:51, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't know for certain if you are paid or not, but I don't think that you chose the topics that you wrote about by chance. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 19:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot:: please give an answer! I want to create new meaningful articles for Wikipedia, I want to improve it! Please give me an answer! And please pay attention to my significant articles that have been moved to the draft. Namerst (talk) 16:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you summon me here? 331dot (talk) 16:27, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: I saw that you communicated with other members about the blocking and I ask for your help. Namerst (talk) 16:40, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: I also really want to invite you. Please rate my input. There are all significant articles. Please give an answer! They are not advertising and are written without conflicts of interest. Namerst (talk) 17:56, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Orangemike: Please give feedback. Check out my articles, I'm ready for a dialogue. Namerst (talk) 16:45, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: Please pay attention to my articles. almost all of them were translated from the Russian Wikipedia. For example, the article Aviasales in Russian Wikipedia has existed since 2011. Positive Technologies has been around since 2009. These are very well-known companies. The style of presentation of the articles was a neutral, literal translation from the Russian Wikipedia. Please pay someone's attention to my requests! Namerst (talk) 16:57, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Namerst (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@331dot: You refused to unlock me. But you didn't even explain to me why I was blocked. I pointed out to you that my articles are not promotional. They are all significant, but they were still moved to draft and templates were installed. Why there is no proof from you. Why am I blocked? I am very offended that my request was not considered on the merits. I was denied without clear consideration. I ask other administrators to consider my request. I am ready to answer all questions.Namerst (talk) 20:06, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock puppetry. To start with, you'd need to explain Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Namerst. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:20, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not sure what makes you think I did not consider it on the merits, that's exactly what I did. I don't need to tell you why you are blocked as MER-C did that already. As I've already reviewed a request, I cannot review another. I suggest you not ping other admins here- your request is open and visible to administrators. 331dot (talk) 20:25, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why weren't my articles reviewed? I was accused of advertising, but not a single advertising article was dropped. I was accused of creating insignificant articles, but I was not shown which articles were insignificant. Why doesn't anyone want to watch my draft? And how can I prove that I have no conflict of interest? Namerst (talk) 03:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising or promotion is not just selling something or soliciting customers, at least on Wikipedia. All the subjects you say are your interests are all subjects that benefit from marketing or SEO or other promotional efforts. I don't speak for the next reviewer and any decision on this is up to them, but it might help if you said what other areas you want to edit in that aren't people or companies. If you have no conflict of interest, that should be easy for you to do. 331dot (talk) 08:51, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: Yes, I plan to write articles about boxers. I will make translations from Russian Wikipedia. These will be boxers who have already died and who still perform in professional sports. I also plan to improve the articles about Russian cities, as many of them are very small. I will also want to write about significant companies such as Aviasales. I translated it from the Russian Wikipedia, it has the status of a good article there. I am ready to answer all subsequent questions. I want to say again that I have nothing to do with these companies and people. They are not advertising and they are meaningful. Please pay attention to them. For example, an article about Viktor Orlovsky, I wrote a small stub about his biography. Forbes writes about him, considers his success in the work of Sberbank, and subsequently success in startups. For example, an article about Oleg Roy, who is one of the most famous living writers in Russia. There are no advertisements and I am not affiliated with these persons in any way. Please pay attention to this! Namerst (talk) 09:14, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If necessary, I can opt out of writing articles about people and companies. I will write on completely different topics. But I don't understand why, if a person or company is significant, why can't I write about them? Namerst (talk) 09:55, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to demonstrate that you don't have a conflict of interest, that's how to do it. 331dot (talk) 10:16, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: How do I do this ? I sincerely expressed my thoughts. What else do I need to do ? Namerst (talk) 10:36, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wait for someone to review your request. 331dot (talk) 10:42, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. I am very much waiting for a response from other administrators and am also ready to answer all questions. @331dot: please see my articles that were moved to draft. They are all significant and not advertising. If you don't mind, help move them to the main space. And if they are not significant in your opinion, put them up for deletion, I am also ready to discuss them. Thank you very much! Namerst (talk) 11:18, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: Hello. Please pay attention to my articles that have been moved to draft. For example, the article Draft:Aviasales.ru, Draft:Victor Orlovski. I can't even submit a request to review these articles, since I'm blocked. I'm still waiting for the admins to respond. Please take a look at them, they are good and informative articles written in a neutral style and have significance. Thank you very much! Namerst (talk) 18:54, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to take a look. I marked them both as advertising. They may not qualify for G11 as drafts, but they would in mainspace. I will not unblock, because if you think these are NPOV articles, you shouldn't be editing. DGG ( talk ) 22:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DGG: Tell me how I can be in this situation? I cannot edit at the moment. I do not think that articles are written in advertising style. For example, the Aviasales article has a criticism section. I repeat that I translated it from the Russian Wikipedia, where it has the status of good. Could you clean up the ad to bring it into the main space? I ask for help as I cannot rule. Thank! Namerst (talk) 04:40, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

While blocked, you only have access to this page to request to be unblocked. You cannot be asking others to edit for you. Another administrator will review your request; please be patient, and please do not ping administrators to come here. 331dot (talk) 08:24, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ymblanter: Здравствуйте. Пишу Вам и надеюсь, что Вы увидите это сообщение. Меня заблокировали якобы за создание рекламных и не значимых статей и я понимаю, что меня уже не разблокируют, так как обратное у меня доказать не получается. Мне очень неприятно, что большое количество моих статей перенесли в инкубатор, к примеру статья о поисковике Aviasales. Я её перевёл из русской Википедии где она имеет статус хорошей статьи. Я очень сильно прошу Вас, взгляните пожалуйста на перенесённые мои статьи в инкубатор. Они значимы и не содержат рекламы. Мне с Вами намного проще общаться и донести до Вас информацию, так как Вы понимаете русский. Спасибо Вам большое! Я надеюсь на помощь! Namerst (talk) 14:49, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the user at least twice evaded their block today: 2A00:1FA0:48FA:D7C9:417:DFE8:EBDF:C93 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), 93.77.161.95 (talk · contribs · WHOIS)--Ymblanter (talk) 16:03, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

I have answered your message on my talk page User_talk:Alex_Bakharev#Помощь. While you are blocked please keep your conversations here, on your talk page. I will monitor it here. Using IPs to circumvents blocks does not usually do any good Alex Bakharev (talk) 02:25, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Alex Bakharev: Спасибо за ответ. Если Вы не против, я буду писать на русском. Очень много моих статей были перенесены в драфт. И на самом деле очень обидно, что значимые статьи, не рекламные, переносятся в драфт. По поводу Aviasales я если честно вообще в шоке... Там ведь ни капли рекламы... По настоящему значимая статья... Да, источники русские, но ведь это ничего не меняет, правила разрешают использовать источники на любых языках. Далее статья о Олеге Рое - один из самых известных ныне живущих писателей России. И она тоже в драфте, обидно... Виктор Орловский, я написал о нем маленький стаб, о нём написано две огромные статьи в форбсе, о его деятельности и успехах. Далее статья о Positive Technologies, одна из крупнейших отечественных компаний в сфере IT. Очень обидно, что значимые и не рекламные статьи были перенесены в драфт.. Я уже если честно не знаю у кого просить помощи, потому что править возможности у меня нет, и каким-то образом посодействовать их переносу также нет. Был бы очень благодарен, если Вы поможете в этом. Спасибо! Namerst (talk) 13:06, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Aviasales.ru has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aviasales.ru. Thanks! Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^{Talk to me} 10:22, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Yaroslav Andreev

Hello, Namerst. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yaroslav Andreev, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.