User talk:Neferkere

RAMSES XI

I have edited the page on Ramses XI since it contained some factual inaccuracies and poorly informed statements.

-the Chief Workman Nekhemmut was the son of Chief Workman Khons (e.g. Bierbrier, Late New Kingdom, 30, Chart VIII). He was not the son of Amenua. Contrary to what was suggested, these were clearly distinct individuals.

-Although the observation on the discrepancy in the titles of (Chief) Doorkeeper Dhuthotpe in P. Mayer A is correct in itself, it should be noted that the first instance (Mayer A, 5.15 -giving the more modest title) concerns an entry which was clearly 'abandoned'/unfinished (no further text after the name is given, which is very strange compared to the other entries), very probably because the scribe noticed that there was something wrong with what he had just written. One could even argue that the best way to explain the unfinished entry of 5.15 is to assume that it was abandoned precisely because exact titles mattered to the scribe!

-I have also removed the remarks about the suggested "impossibility" to have the Taxation Papyrus, the House List (this is not a papyrus, but merely an entry on P. BM 10068!) and Pinehesy ascribed to the whm-mswt era. The contributor apparently has not read the elaborate explanations in:

-Thijs, SAK 31 (2003), 289-306

-Thijs, SAK 35 (2006), 307-326

The statement as given is premature and damaging to a theory he/she has apparently not studied in depth.

I have also slightly altered the remark about the abandonment of the Village. There is no certainty about the time this took place. It is believed by many to have been a fairly gradual event, which may well have partly postdated the reign of Ramses XI.

Neferkere (talk) 00:18, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Turin Taxation Papyrus was called a papyrus by Thijs in GM 173 when it is actually just a houselist, I agree. But The fact that Pinehesy is mentioned in the Year 12 Houselist text is a major problem for Thijs theory and should not be removed--since it explains why most Egyptologists reject his views that this document dates to the Renaissance era. Only Dodson accepts them in 'Afterglow of Empire.' And even Aston says that this is probably wrong today in this book review Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:06, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
PS: I agree that 'Dhuthope' is a problem but perhaps Thijs should explain why he is given different titles in the document. Or perhaps you can give your views in the Ramesses XI article why this may not be a problem. But Pinehsy's appearance in the Year 12 houselist is a big problem. The houselist surely dates to the Year 12 pre-whmst era when Pinehesy was not an enemy of the king. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:15, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ramesses X may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Since [[Ramesses XI]] came to the throne on 3 ''šmw'' 20 (third month of the Summer season, day 20,<ref>K. Ohlhafer, GM 135 (1993), 59ff</ref> it

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:49, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Pap. Ambras

Hi, I'm TheNZCactus. Neferkere, thanks for creating Pap. Ambras!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I recommend you split the Pap. Ambras page into sections, so that it is easier to read and interpret.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. TheNZCactus (talk) 08:02, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ramessesnakht

This 1998 SAK article by Polz has an extensive coverage on the career and family of the HP Ramessesnakht Here Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:13, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Story of Wenamun, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jaroslav Černý. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Neferkere. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ramesses XII?

Dear Neferkare, I was wondering if you have seen Ian Mladjov's article here. The evidence is strong that he might exist since he used the rare Amun epithet Mereramun just like Ramesses IX and XI--the other known Ramesside kings rather than meryamun. It is free. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:17, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a photo of this king's cartouche. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:37, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Neferkere. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]