User talk:Netmaster5k

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

Link spam

Please do not add commercial links — or links to your own private websites — to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --Yamla 04:00, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to AOL

Your recent edit to AOL was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 04:49, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page User:AntiVandalBot on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Zpb52 04:59, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Westwoodgreen.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:Westwoodgreen.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 09:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:G06293l4g2p.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:G06293l4g2p.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Image:Westwoodgreen.PNG has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Antonio Lopez ^(talk) 23:22, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the recent edit you made to User talk:76.24.141.249 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. 21 655 ^{ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ?} 15:38, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:76.24.141.249, you will be blocked from editing. Uncle Milty (talk) 15:39, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Can Kim Hua. 21 655 ^{ωhατ δo γoυ ωαητ?} 15:42, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 72 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 15:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]