User talk:NingBing

Welcome!

Hello, NingBing, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 12:29, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Wilfrid René Wood may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

*''By Underground to Kew; Strelitzia Reginae (1926))'' <ref>Wilfrid Rene Wood, [http://www.ltmuseumshop.co.uk/posters/gallery/product/unframed/poster/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:29, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wilfrid Wood

Hello. I have started a discussion about the best title for the page at Talk:Wilfrid René Wood; please take a look. Thanks for your work on the page so far. Nedrutland (talk) 11:41, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The "Rene" bit seems useful because of the living artist called "Wilfrid Wood" (www.wilfridwood.com), but I don't care strongly about either the accent or the shortened form of his name, as long as the shortened form does not lead to ambiguity (or broken links). BTW, this is my first time in "talk", so let me know if I'm doing things wrong. NingBing (talk) 12:31, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Australian aviation firsts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darwin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Three word budget

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Three word budget requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The Drover's Wife (talk) 00:47, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

I wasn't sure if you'd see my response on the help desk page, so I thought I'd post here (and add to it).

For what it's worth, I'm the one who flagged the article for speedy deletion. I did so because it was an obvious candidate - it was a flash-in-the-pan Twitter tag which attracted bugger all mainstream media attention and was completely forgotten about by the next week. It roundly failed even the most basic notability criteria for articles that Wikipedia has. I generally err on the side of including material on Wikipedia, I'm Australian, and I'm a fervent opponent of this budget (and thus agree with you politically) - this was just something that couldn't meet even the lowest possible bar Wikipedia has. I think you totally mean well but you're fundamentally misunderstanding Wikipedia's notability criteria. You can grasp at straws to an extent when you're making notability arguments, but this is waaaay beyond what you can get away with.

To respond to your arguments on the administrator's talk page: It isn't "an emerging new term or phrase". It was a Twitter hashtag fad that lasted for a few days and didn't make much of an impact. Neither is it a significant use of Twitter and hashtags (in Australia): I don't even use Twitter and I can think of a bunch off the top of my head that are far more notable. I think Twitter hashtags generally are something you're going to find will nearly always get deleted, but this one isn't within cooee of the bar to be kept. "Immediate public reaction" to a government decision via Twitter is not vaguely new, and this is neither a new or particularly popular example of it, and "amusing and clever" might be very funny but it doesn't get stuff kept on Wikipedia.

tl;dr Twitter hashtags are almost never going to get seen as notable unless there's a really good reason. I can think of some hilarious ones on my pet causes that have been going for nearly a year, have large-scale worldwide participation in my communities, and have spilled over a bit into the real world, but I'm pretty confident that if I tried writing articles on them - even if I'd cited them to the hilt - they'd be instantly put on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion and I'd probably lose the argument.

Wikipedia's coverage of the budget is crap compared to what it could be, and there are better places to spend your time if you're interested in contributing. The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:31, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC William Ewart Hart was accepted

William Ewart Hart, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FireflySixtySeven (talk) 17:51, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Joseph Joel Hammond was accepted

Joseph Joel Hammond, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

FireflySixtySeven (talk) 17:35, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Arthur Herbert Affleck (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:49, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! NingBing, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at AfC Arthur Herbert Affleck was accepted

Arthur Herbert Affleck, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e decker ^talk 14:29, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wilfrid Rene Wood

Hello NingBing. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Wilfrid Rene Wood".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Wilfrid Rene Wood}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:28, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Chocolatey

Hello NingBing. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Chocolatey".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Chocolatey}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 00:08, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Three word budget has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Three word budget. Thanks! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 17:32, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Three word budget (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joseph2302 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Three word budget and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Joseph2302 (talk) 17:35, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Three word budget

Hello, NingBing. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Three word budget".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:06, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chocolatey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chocolatey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chocolatey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 11:33, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chocolatey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chocolatey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chocolatey (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

AllyD (talk) 13:54, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]