User talk:Nofunclub

Jack Blood Deletion

Here's the discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Blood. It was pretty well unanimous. The page was protected after one too many people tried to recreate it in spite of the deletion consensus.

If you would like to appeal the decision, the venue for that is Deletion Review. Fan-1967 23:15, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, deletion appeals are handled at Deletion Review. However, simply complaining about others' opinions will not be sufficient. You would need to provide Reliable Sources to Verify that the program, and its host, is in fact notable. I see nothing to disprove the assumptions in the deletion discussion. The burden of proof is on the article proponent. Fan-1967 05:49, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Peephole

Please do not edit the user pages of other contributors without their approval or consent. It may be seen as vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please visit the sandbox. -WarthogDemon 05:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do we have a communication problem here?

→ Deletion Review ← See how the link is blue? That means click on it. That's where deletions are appealed. Harassing the editors who voted to delete the article months ago will accomplish nothing except to get you blocked from editing Wikipedia. I would recommend you lose the attitude and find sources that support the subject's notability. Then calmly and rationally make your case. Fan-1967 05:57, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

oops, my mistake.

I clicked edit page, instead of that little + I never Intended to do anything wrong? I thought I was adding a comment. I just wanted to ask 1 or two questions.

I never intended to appear offencive or with Attitude dont misjudge my direct approach

I will continue this issue as suggested.

Kindly Dr.No.