User talk:Notdoppler

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of The Lion King II characters, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of The Lion King II characters was changed by Notdoppler (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2008-08-08T10:51:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 10:51, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:40, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Dodgechris (2nd) for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Frickative 23:31, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Judge Alderman

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Judge Alderman, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CultureDrone (talk) 10:46, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Johnny Alexander

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Johnny Alexander, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironho lds 10:51, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joan Akers

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Joan Akers, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironho lds 10:51, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop for now please

I have checked two of your recent articles, and they are both taken almost literally from the Coronation Street Wiki. This means that they are copyright violations, which is not allowed on Wikipedia. The CS Wiki operates under the GFDL, so attribution is needed. Please stop creating such articles.Fram (talk) 10:52, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Harry Bailey (coronation street)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Harry Bailey (coronation street), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironho lds 10:53, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you might want to check out

Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Dodgechris (2nd). Ironho lds 10:57, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

PLease stop posting text lifted straight from the Coronation Street Wiki, as you now did on List of past Coronation Street characters (1960-1969). You will be blocked for further copyright violations. Fram (talk) 10:59, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ryan Connor.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ryan Connor.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images

Why are you replacng a poor quality, lame image over Jerry Morton's current image which is superior quality and clearer? GunGagdin^Moan 17:15, 29 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Gungadin. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ~ Troy (talk) 19:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for sockpuppetry, harassment and personal attacks. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Okiefromokla ^questions? 20:03, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note from blocking admin: User admitted to being sockpuppet of an indef blocked user here, but given the contribution history of this account prior to the last day, it is ~~probable~~ possible that this account was compromised. Okiefromokla ^questions? 20:11, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A more thorough look through the account's contribs and the past sockpuppet cases associated with it leads me to believe that it is more probable that this user has been a sockpuppet all along, rather than a newly compromised account. Okiefromokla ^questions? 20:24, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Horrid Henry.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Horrid Henry.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 17:38, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Moody Margaret.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Moody Margaret.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 23:36, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vernon Tomlin.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Vernon Tomlin.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:01, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Notdoppler! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 314 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Madhav Sharma - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:53, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Horrid Henry characters for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Horrid Henry characters is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Horrid Henry characters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Artem.G (talk) 18:07, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]