User talk:Nuttycoconut

Welcome!

Hello, Nuttycoconut, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Firsfron of Ronchester 05:51, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Thanks for fixing up my talk page when that guy vandalized it. 'Preciate it. Dan 06:01, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem! --Nuttycoconut 06:46, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, that guy who vandalised Chris Beardsley has had a go at Paul Brayson. Could you give him the final touches to his blocking? ;) Mattythewhite 11:01, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry just came back online and saw your msg. Looks like he's stopped (at least for now). If he restarts I'm sure he will get blocked. --Nuttycoconut 16:58, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The user who keeps adding questions reguarding pools and water, 99.249.156.149 added something to your talk page, which I deleted. You can check the history. He has been doing this to everyone's talk pages of users who remove his vandalism. Daedalus969 (talk) 03:48, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thanks for doing that. I see he's now been blocked. Thanks again. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 03:51, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hye you delete my edit to pg rupa i don't appreciate it ur very mean wikipedia :(

74.13.98.131 (talk) 06:47, 13 January 2008 (UTC)me[reply]

Reply on user's talkpage. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 06:51, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

Replied to your post on my user talk there itselfxC | ☎ 08:38, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Why did you remove my picture of jesus don't you know he really did that with his animals. Forcing them down and using people like that.

To start with, you removed a picture that was already there without good reason. The page is about zoophilia, and you are clearly being idiotic posting that picture there. I don't really understand your last statement, forcing what down and using what people??? --Nuttycoconut 18:14, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the guy above this guy tried blocking me from fixing Norwin High Schools page He put pics of basset hounds on it when it is a high schools page o the humanity!

Hi (seperate)

Why do you continue to remove factual information from Nicole Kidman's page, how is this meant to be " a free encyclopedia of the highest quality" if you continue to remove this information.

I believed you just answered the question yourself. It is an encyclopedia. Not a blog for posting your meeting (however nice it was for you) with her in a cafeteria. --Nuttycoconut 05:34, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It also shows how is currently in the country, and more specifically, in Bondi Junction.

Sockpuppet?

So you're claiming that I'm a sockpuppet for some other user? I have a static IP address and a long list of contributions to Wiki - I'm not a sockpuppet nor am I using any other unregistered accounts to post to Wiki.

Let's see some documentation of this: leading to the increasing popularity of game such as venison; in the Meat article. My bet is that consumption of game foods has severely decreased compared to the total amount of meat consumed, so I'll remove that again unless you can provide documentation. Thanks Bob98133 16:32, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool - no problem, the deletion was accidental - I'm still a bit new at this and multiple changes always throw me off. I'll stand back and check outthe changes before I do others to that page. Thanks for quick reply. Bob98133 16:51, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Vandalism Thanks

You caught it before I could! --Orange Mike 16:22, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :) --Nuttycoconut 16:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch on Cuba page

Thanks was fixing it when your change came through. El Jigue208.65.188.149 16:33, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcomed. I'm off to sleep now. Your turn on the watch! --Nuttycoconut 16:36, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

IP warning

Comment moved from user page. -- Gogo Dodo 07:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I received a message from this user to my IP address, saying that I had vandalized the Economics page. I have never vandalized any Wikipedia page, and was wondering if I could see the changes made to the page. From User:Dan 1024.

I left a reply for the editor above. -- Gogo Dodo 07:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. Cheers. --Nuttycoconut 13:02, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblock (IP address is shared by all users of my ISP)

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 202.156.10.13 lifted. Request handled by: -- lucasbfr ^talk 09:26, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! — Timotab ^{Timothy (not Tim}^dagnabbit!) 04:49, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, happy to help! --Nuttycoconut 04:50, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help - Owl

Thanks for the help in reverting Owl of that ORLY image. I requested page protection but I don't know if it'll go through. ... discospinster _talk 03:15, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I'll request IP block if s/he continues with the vandalism. --Nuttycoconut 03:17, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well whaddaya know? It worked. ... discospinster _talk 03:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sorry, I didnt know i would get in trouble for that--75.82.16.153 03:28, 7 October 2007 (UTC) No problem, we welcome efforts like yours to the wiki project. Just remember to be friendly! --Nuttycoconut 03:31, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

african-american

NOt every african-american is black!!! do some research before reverting my correct edit. she is african-american and she is white so what?! She is not only one white person from Africa living in Usa. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.99.113.137 (talk) 04:15, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your report at WP:AIV. As the matter was not vandalism but a content dispute I have removed the report. I have however also warned the IP against WP:3RR violation and reverted the article to the wording you preferred. I have also removed the flag icon per WP:FLAG. If the problem persists I suggest pursuing it in article talk and (if necessary) reporting the IP at WP:AN3. I hope this is of some help. --John 04:36, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Nuttycoconut 04:42, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all. --John 04:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

a thank you

Hi. Thanks for your efforts reverting vandalism to my userpage. It is now semi-protected; hopefully, this will deter some of the naughty editors. Everyone gets cookies - enjoy. --Jack Merridew 09:25, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Same here, thanks. Garion96 (talk) 17:29, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting vandalism

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user talk page. NHRHS2010 talk 12:49, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ellen DeGeneres

I haven't been editing. The talk page is not included under those sections in the vandalism policy. Further I think a bias is a problem and as such you shall not be the one to decide continue any such block request. Your warns will be reported as excessive. I am going to start an abritration

Reply to above on user's talkpage 24.150.46.68--Nuttycoconut (talk) 09:38, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jews : Polish Underground

I removed a section on the Polish Underground in the Jew article, and put an explanation for the removal on the "Jew" talk page. You reverted it. If you disagree with my explanation, would you mind explaining why at that talk page why you reverted it, so that we don't just waste time reverting each other? Momojeng (talk) 14:30, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise, I didn't spot your contributions to the talkpage section as a reason was not indicated in the edit summary. I mistakenly believed it was vandalism as this page often gets attacked. I won't change it again. You might just want to type "see talkpage" or equivalent in the edit summary though as someone else might be as trigger fingered as me in reverting it back. My apologies again. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 14:39, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Negro

Hi Nuttycoconut, the version of Negro I keep reverting to is the consensus version which has been built towards for months. This other version is a Afrocentric erasion of history by user:Jeeny and her various puppets. --222.155.58.191 (talk) 08:08, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hang on. Give me a few minutes to check on the talkpage. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 08:10, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid you will have to point out where the consensus part came from. I can't see any evidence that there's been a consensus reached yet (and obviously that won't be one between both you and Jeeny - yes she's a banned editor but so are you). You two really should stop this edit warring, I find it stressful just watching you two play this out daily. For the record, I think both versions are fine in general. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 08:18, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a thread in the Negro talkpage to get a consensus. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 08:35, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

And what might those edits be my good fellow? And how are they considered vandalism? 172.164.16.207 (talk) 02:35, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please tell me, what are you talking about? 172.164.16.207 (talk) 02:35, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm done making edits until you message me. 172.164.16.207 (talk) 02:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK sorry about the delay. I'm reverting your changes because you seemed to be just reverting changes made by Gscshoyru because he got you banned on your previous IP 172.166.222.171. I'm not sure whether that's really a good enough reason to revert his/her changes. N'est pas? --Nuttycoconut (talk) 02:47, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lol I saw you edit your talk page and I clicked edit to reply and now I have a new messages message.

But seriously read over the conversation between me and Gscshoyru and you will see that he is completely wrong, he never cited any Wikipedia policy to his actions and I actually cited policy that described him as a vandal. 172.164.16.207 (talk) 02:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm...I realised that but your ban was never lifted so the decision was still ultimately against you i.e. you were still considered the vandal. For the record, I'm not really in favour of changing templates of other userpages without their consent. My bet is that your edits will just get reverted again by other editors. I'm going offline now so can't play this pingpong game with you.... --Nuttycoconut (talk) 02:56, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well thanks for giving me some benefit of the doubt my friend, and hey have one hell of a happy new year! 172.164.16.207 (talk) 03:00, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chatsworth Hills Academy

D3f: The edit I applied was not a vandlism of the Chatsworth Hills Academy page. I understand your actions, but this information was applied to point out the current status of a staff member who teaches at this school. The community in question that is informing parents of this information, currently require it to be accessible by as many people of Chatsworth as possible. I will not progress to re-edit the page or anything, as I hold respect to your actions. I just think that the information is very important.

Reply on user talkpage. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 07:55, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit conflict

he reported me to administrators for vandalism. If i get blocked, will you vouch for me? Tech43 (talk) 08:47, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks alot. i got really confused, because i was in a stuation with another IP starting with "72" at the time. I was on the verge of a meltdown at 1 poiint. thanks for clearing us. oh, and i have no intention of talking to him again. Tech43 (talk) 08:59, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete history

cheers, thought that could have been deleted now the issue had been resolved. Happy New Year —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.150.124.233 (talk) 16:56, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal

I blocked the range for a short time, ring me if he comes back. -- lucasbfr ^{ho ho ho} 10:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, happy new year. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 05:15, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

O, you are so poor. You thing block me. just that. I don't live in USA or in a UK. I don't speak english. I am learned english language 20 years ago. --78.3.101.60 (talk) 16:39, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See reply on user talkpage. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 16:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

got your back for a bit...

I'm catching what you missing for a bit (until about 07:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)). Man there's a lot of stuff isn't there. May we all make this a better place. Sincerely, Sir Intellegence - smartr tahn eaver!!!! 05:12, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks and happy new year. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 05:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

See you latter. Have fun fixing things. I almost feel like I need a shower after fixing those things... Sincerely, Sir Intellegence - smartr tahn eaver!!!! 06:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up

Yeah, I lost my cool. My bad. I greatly dislike that certain user, and other similar group of users who are leading Wikipedia in a certain direction. I continue to grow dissappointed with the direction Wikipedia is heading with regards to certain matters. At the least, I can still come to Wikipedia for genuine research. Also, I have to say I am impressed with how quickly my edits were reverted. It's a good sign that vandalism can be caught so quickly. This message was intentionally vague. 69.121.136.217 (talk) 10:25, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I understand. Wiki being a project based on contributions by the masses inevitably means that there will always be disagreements among contributors. And I agree sometimes getting your contributions deleted or edited can be quite annoying. Don't give up on it, I hope you will continue to contribute. Cheers and happy new year. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 10:30, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For all your work protecting Wikipedia from vandalism. Tiddly-Tom 10:20, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Can I eat this? :D

Of course - you earned it ;) Tiddly-Tom 10:32, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ISP block /Carrie Fisher

I blocked the ISP as a suspected puppet; haven't protected the articles, waiting to see if another ISP pops up with the same MO. If there's further collateral damage, just drop me a line or repost at WP:AIV. SkierRMH (talk) 06:06, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK Thanks --Nuttycoconut (talk) 06:22, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

I do not understand the message recently left on my talk page. Explain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.190.89.154 (talk) 08:12, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the message was intended for you (as explained in the large statement on the talkpage) - it is directed at your IP address which is shared by many others. Just ignore it but don't delete it. If you want to avoid these irrelevant messages, sign up for an a/c. Thanks. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 08:16, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. I've had many an account in my day, but repeatedly found myself dragged into WikiPolitics. These days I edit anonymously from IPs, although I find there are more and more road blocks to those of us who do this : ( 65.190.89.154 (talk) 08:20, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to hear about that. I think yours is the same reason quite a few people choose to edit anonymously. Once you get offside with some editors, it does make editing tricky. I hope this doesn't stop you. Cheers. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 08:29, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! No-one in my house has ever been on Supercooling. Thanks for cleaning up the vandalism I never did 121.218.180.199 (talk) 12:45, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey...

It's not vandalism, you just don't understand the reference. But you'll continue censoring anyway... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.234.184.204 (talk) 04:19, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I clearly don't watch enough Ren and Stimpy shows... --Nuttycoconut (talk) 04:23, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Thanks for repairing the recent vandalism to my user page. Your help is greatly appreciated. -DevinCook (talk) 04:39, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. cheers. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 04:40, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Me too

Thanks for this repair. Toddst1 (talk) 04:50, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcomed. Cheers. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 04:51, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Me three!

Always nice to return to a clean and unmolested user page. Thanks. —Noah 06:41, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo! --Nuttycoconut (talk) 16:02, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Please tell me, how did I "vandalise" Sea Shepherd ? I just put their flag and added some info! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Destroyer2110 (talk • contribs) 10:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply on user's talkpage. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 10:24, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dude! They have sunk 10 ships, they have been sued for piracy, illegal deck boarding and vandalism and they proclaim themselvs as pirates (eco-pirates). You can check it out on the myspace of captain Paul Watson. He says occupation: eco-pirate. They all call themselves so. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Destroyer2110 (talk • contribs) 10:27, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm....I see what you mean, do you think ecopirates are the same as plain old pirates? I always thought of pirates as someone who robs and kills people, Sea Shepherd's goals are deemed as more "noble"(rightly or wrongly). Anyway, you've made a good argument re your edits so I'm removing my original edits on your IP talkpage. If you wish to revert my edits on the Sea Shepherd article, please do so but you may want to cite it (e.g using the myspace website) and use the term "ecopirate" rather than pirate, otherwise it may be mistakenly viewed as vandalism again...Cheers --Nuttycoconut (talk) 10:51, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, ill put eco-pirate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Destroyer2110 (talk • contribs) 10:57, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS. Please sign your comments on talkpages in future by clicking on the signature tab at the top so readers can see who's posting the comments. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 10:51, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. --Destroyer2110 (talk) 11:25, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User_talk:219.84.127.166, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. It's their choice whether to remove warnings surely? Deadly∀ssassin^(talk) 08:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ignore the standard text - it's inappropriate to the point I was trying to make. :) --Deadly∀ssassin^(talk) 08:16, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Query

First of all, no probem *wink*. Im not sure if you had a personalised user page, so i left it blank (sorry if it caused any inconvinence)Drydom ^{Any thoughts?} 11:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all, it's deliberately left blank to avoid vandalism - not that it works...--Nuttycoconut (talk) 11:16, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have you tried redirecting to your talk page - it looks better than a blank page? --Deadly∀ssassin^(talk) 11:44, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then they'll want to vandalise my talkpage...--Nuttycoconut (talk) 17:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revert.

You're welcome. :) By the way, do you want me to delete your userpage? Blanking it yourself would make it meet WP:CSD#G7, but I thought I should ask first... · AndonicO ^Hail! 03:25, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 07:48, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

talkSPORT

Thanks for reverting my supposed 'comments'. I should probably keep a closer eye on what I contribute to talk pages. Thanks Willow177 (talk) 18:22, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning vandals

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Jellyfish: You may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Enigma ^msg! 02:50, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my userpage! DiligentTerrier • talk |sign here 18:15, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please accept this invite to join the Homeschooling WikiProject, a WikiProject dedicated to improving all articles associated with Homeschooling.
Simply click here to accept! DiligentTerrier • talk

Thanks

... for helping protect my help page. I put in a WP:AIV to get his IP blocked so we'll get the last laugh. :) --JaGa (talk) 08:56, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, I don't think any admins are working today...he's still vandalising. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 09:02, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, looks like Longhair finally put an end to it. I didn't even know they could block an entire IP range, very cool - I'll bet that loser is cussin' now, LOL! I gotta admit, it was kinda fun to watch the battle, but I hope that doesn't happen often. Good night! --JaGa (talk) 09:59, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, goodnite. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 10:04, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re AIV report of ip hopping vandals at Michael Tsarion

I'm about to remove the above report, as it isn't the correct venue. I suggest you place the same report at WP:ANI where it is likely to be better investigated. In the meantime I will play "whack a troll" on vandals on the pages you mentioned. LessHeard vanU (talk) 09:34, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, seems that one of the targets had their own banhammer - and used it. LessHeard vanU (talk) 09:39, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Wished I had one *sniff* --Nuttycoconut (talk) 09:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, he's still vandalising, not a very good hammer that one...--Nuttycoconut (talk) 09:43, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of Rugrats characters

An editor has nominated List of Rugrats characters, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Rugrats characters and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Avram Grant

Yes you are right.Sorry about that.--86.41.85.203 (talk) 10:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Days of the year guideline

As a frequent contributor (or vandal patroller) to the days of the year articles (WP:DAYS), your comments on the current state of the proposed guideline for that project would be greatly appreciated. Discussion is taking place here. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 19:01, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AIV

Hello, thank you for your report at WP:AIV, however that page is intended for the reporting of vandals who have continued to disrupt past their final warning. For requests to have pages protected, you should see WP:RFPP. Thanks! Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 04:01, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 04:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Barack Obama

That's cool. Thanks for fixing it.. Floorsheim (talk) 17:00, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCookie!

???

I don't quite recall editing Roman Catholicism in Afganistan. Are you sure you have the right IP Address? 70.137.155.9 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 04:33, 18 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]

( I never did it and that is not my opinion. Perhaps someone else did it. Anyway, I hope I'm not considered a vandal because that was never my intention. 70.137.155.9 (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 04:36, 18 November 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Thanking for reverting Vandalism

I appriciate your reverting vandalism on the page Yemenite citron. Go ahead! shoteh (talk) 20:51, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. --Nuttycoconut (talk) 05:41, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]