User talk:Octopus69

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Octopus69. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 03:13, 19 January 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Octopus69, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

You also need to read Help:Referencing for beginners. --David Biddulph (talk) 03:15, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Robert Carli, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 04:40, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Robert Carli has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Robert Carli. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:13, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Carli has been accepted

Robert Carli, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 19:32, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Luke McMaster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Degrassi

McMaster & James (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Nick Carter

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Octopus69. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Marty Simon.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Marty Simon.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 03:45, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Octopus69! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Birth and age info, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Octopus69! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, A few questions about Sandbox and moving an article to the Wikipedia main space, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Octopus69! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Infobox, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nicholas Jennings (author, music historian) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nicholas Jennings (author, music historian). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:27, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing?

Hello Octopus69. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Octopus69. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Octopus69|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 16:39, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's dismaying that you are still editing a draft about a music industry person. I really think you should answer this question. - Bri.public (talk) 21:34, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry - I thought I already had answered TheRoadIsLong on this question - and Bri - hopefully you'll read this as well.

No to paid editing. A good portion of my revisions has been doing a few repetitive things as I continue to get use to Wiki's ways of doing things. Anyhow, I'm now finished with the Marty Simon post and want to place it on Wiki but it keeps getting kicked back. Maybe you can tell me what I'm doing wrong. Octopus69 (talk) 03:59, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In response to Theroadislong and Bri.public, first my apologies in not responding sooner. Thought I had but I think I was mistaken. Second, there is no paid editing. I know that this practice is forbidden by Wiki. I thought that Marty Simon has had a varied career that involves several aspects of the music business that deserved recognition, including considerable time spent in Quebec, and there are several nuances to his livelihood. Many of those edits involved trying to link him to Wiki in Quebec, which is not the easiest of tasks since it took a while to find those sources. And sometimes I'm figuring out the code. I like to be as thorough as I can, and tinker and spend time with it over lengthy periods of time, so I am constantly revising stuff. I don't understand why you wish to punish me for being meticulous. I've spent over six months on Simon's particular page. It is now ready. How do I place it on the main Wiki page without getting it bounced back to my draft section? Thank you for your assistance.Octopus69 (talk) 14:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:MartySimon2019.png

Thanks for uploading File:MartySimon2019.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:45, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:MartySimon2017.png

Thanks for uploading File:MartySimon2017.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 00:01, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Marty Simon has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Marty Simon. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:34, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

: User:Theroadislong - Thank you for your input. I'm wondering why sites like AllMusic.com and imdb.com are not considered reliable sources of reference considering their mandates are very much similar to Wikipedia's mandate. I also am intrigued as to why you don't consider Wikipedia a reliable source of reference, since this is the very house you helped build. And here is my question: if I remove those sources of reference, will the information still be accepted? The reason I listed them was to help verify the facts. In some cases, there was no other source of verification I could source. Would they be accepted or deleted if I don't find an alternative or substitute. Any feedback or insight would be appreciated - Thanks, Octopus69 (talk)Octopus69 (talk) 12:42, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

They are user edited, as is Wikipedia so are not considered reliable if the content can't be verified any other way then it probably doesn't belong on Wikipedia,as we only add content supported by reliable sources. Theroadislong (talk) 13:05, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Author Nicholas Jennings.png

Thanks for uploading File:Author Nicholas Jennings.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas Jennings (author, music historian) moved to draftspace

Moved back to Draftspace, I have overseen the history of its, furthermore it is indeed not ready for mainspace.. CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:40, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Octopus69! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Please help - draft is ready to be moved onto Wikipedia, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:04, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nicholas Jennings (author) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nicholas Jennings (author). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Jennings (author) (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicholas Jennings (author) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nicholas Jennings (author), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 02:41, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Octopus69! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Missvain (talk) 02:41, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marty Simon (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ken Tony was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marty Simon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marty Simon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ken Tony ^{Shall we discuss?} 13:44, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Marty Simon has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Marty Simon. Thanks! Ken Tony ^{Shall we discuss?} 13:46, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Drmies (talk) 16:58, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Theroadislong, User:Bri, it is impossible to escape the feeling that this is an UPE, and I acknowledge your earlier suspicions. Drmies (talk) 16:59, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Marty Simon

Hello, Octopus69. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Marty Simon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Nicholas Jennings (author)

Hello, Octopus69. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nicholas Jennings (author), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:46, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Marty Simon

Hello, Octopus69. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marty Simon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:21, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nicholas Jennings (author)

Hello, Octopus69. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nicholas Jennings".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:17, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]