User talk:Oiona

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with...

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Oiona (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 2A02:26F7:C890:7002:0:B0CC:3827:AE6B. Place any further information here. Hello there - I guess I won't be the first person to say that my IP is not a co-host - it's a basic internet account with BT, which, the UK's nations's biggest and most vanilla broadband provider :-). As far as I know BT is not a VPN, but perhaps it accidentally resembles one to you guys. I do have an Apple computer, but I made sure to turn off Apple's VPN. I'd be grateful for your assistance Oiona (talk) 17:21, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

That is a proxy/vpn. Once you disable your proxy/vpn, you need to wait a full 24 hours for the block to clear. Yamla (talk) 19:05, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

On Marianne Githens page, there is a statement which is true but seems a bit gossipy and not exactly related to the subject of this particular page? Is it against the rule sot delete it?

"In 1986, Githen's widowed mother, Anita, married her deceased husband's younger brother William French Githens." Oiona (talk) 09:29, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marianne Githens

I've converted your link to a standard internal link; the whole web address is not necessary. The statement you mentioned has a citation to a New York Times article, so it will be difficult to just remove it. However, you are still free to bring up any concerns you have about it on the article talk page(Talk:Marianne Githens), especially if you have any arguments based in Wikipedia policy or guidelines to support your position. 331dot (talk) 10:14, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I take that back- I removed it since the statement was about her mother and not her(I thought it was about her at first). 331dot (talk) 10:18, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oiona, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Oiona! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:14, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Oiona. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:53, 9 April 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Draft:Farm Animal Investment Risk & Return (FAIRR) concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Farm Animal Investment Risk & Return (FAIRR), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 02:13, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jeremy Coller Foundation

Hello, Oiona. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jeremy Coller Foundation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 01:04, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Farm Animal Investment Risk & Return (FAIRR)

Hello, Oiona. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Farm Animal Investment Risk & Return".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 01:08, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FAIRR (Farm Animal Investment Risk & Return) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, FAIRR (Farm Animal Investment Risk & Return), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 10:47, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:FAIRR (Farm Animal Investment Risk & Return)

Hello, Oiona. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:FAIRR (Farm Animal Investment Risk & Return), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:FAIRR (Farm Animal Investment Risk & Return)

Hello, Oiona. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "FAIRR".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:58, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Times references in Visual Editor

Hi, I am not sure if you'll find this useful, but when building a reference in Visual Editor (like this diff), The Times is omitted as it stands so you have to go into the reference to input manually The Times as the publication. Best wishes, Solipsism 101 (talk) 18:52, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much for your speedy help.

May i ask another question? I'm quite shaky on creating new articles. I've just created a new one about Grigory Grishaev, the new acting head of Russian counterespionage in Ukraine, using my sandbox. Having submitted it, i see the folowing message: "Warning: This page should probably be moved to the Draft namespace." I'm not sure what that will do and whether it's desirable, especially as it's a version of my sandbox.

On the subject, do sub-groups of editors exist to fast-track new articles likely to be of great topical interest, such as for Ukraine? I'm guessing not, and would understand if so. Oiona (talk) 19:47, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I am not particularly familiar with the Articles for Creation review process or if there is a fast track. I was talking about the ref used in the Sergey Beseda article, which I see is the same ref used in your draft. Sorry I couldn't be of more help! Best wishes, Solipsism 101 (talk) 20:41, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Oiona/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Oiona/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:42, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Oiona/sandbox

Hello, Oiona. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Oiona/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Oiona/sandbox

Hello, Oiona. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:10, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Childhood Trust moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Childhood Trust, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:58, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Childhood Trust

Hello, Oiona. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Childhood Trust, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Oiona. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Reed (company), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Edwardx (talk) 13:46, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicola Reed has been accepted

Nicola Reed, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Modussiccandi (talk) 09:35, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]