User talk:OjuzKiopo

February 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lump of labour fallacy have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lump of labour fallacy was changed by OjuzKiopo (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878283 on 2021-02-20T13:53:36+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:53, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 19:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Tagetes. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 21:17, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, I'm Llacb47. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Powerade, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not add unsourced and irrelevant material, like you did in this revision. Llacb47 (talk) 04:04, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:List of climatosecptic parties has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of climatosecptic parties. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 19:57, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of climatosecptic parties (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of climatosecptic parties and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of climatosecptic parties, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 20:28, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OjuzKiopo! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 20:28, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of climatosecptic parties

Hello, OjuzKiopo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of climatosecptic parties, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of climatosecptic parties

Hello, OjuzKiopo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of climatosecptic parties".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:56, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]