User talk:OrangeKnight

Welcome! Hello, OrangeKnight, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! The Rambling Man 17:38, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Do you want to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Participants? I saw your magnificent work on cricket in French Wikipedia. I hope you can improve France national cricket team when you get the time. Thanks! Gizza^Chat ^© 12:09, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is lovely to see cricket fans from non-Test playing countries. You may have noticed that we also have editors from Norway and Switzerland! And I will fix your English mistakes :) Merci Gizza^Chat ^© 12:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well done with your terrific work on the French cricket articles. Excellent stuff. The boys at the cricket project are very helpful if you've any problems Nick mallory 01:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was watching 'French Twist' tonight and noticed that a cricket bat, wielded by a woman, makes an appearance as a weapon of self defence. Nick mallory 14:10, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History of cricket: peer review

Hello again. Thanks for your inputs to this review. I'm going to do some work on the article this weekend to make use of the feedback received. I'll report back when I've made some progress. All the best. BlackJack | ^{talk page} 19:45, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Archie

Hello Mattinbgn,

On fr:, Archie Jackson is the first cricket-related Good Article (Bon article). On fr:, an article become a Good Article through a process similar to the one to become a Featured Article (Article de qualité), that is to say a sort of popular vote... you can see the vote here. As you are the main contributor on Archie Jackson, that I translated to get this first GA, I'd like to thank you for all the work you've done ! OrangeKnight (talk) 18:44, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! I must admit I enjoy seeing something I (largely) wrote translated and read by people who otherwise would not be able to enjoy it and very pleased to see that an article on what is very much a non-francophone sport was recognised. I like the percentage you used for francophones not interested in cricket (99.94%)! Cheers, Mattinbgn\^talk 19:50, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

The follow on question on the wikipedia cricket quiz was a good one.Can you tell me How did you research for the question,do you have a database available somewhere ,or is that possible using cricinfo statsguru.? And PS: It is absolutely lovely to see a cricket fan from France..I am amazed as to how you have gotten interested in the game. My Mail id is <wikipedia user name > AT gmail.com Sumant81 (talk) 10:29, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good stuff.Thanks for the reply.Will look forward to your mail :) Sumant81 (talk) 04:30, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clark/Clarke

Cheers for correcting my error at Australian cricket team in England in 2009. I must've misread "Clark" for "Clarke", and I could only remember one current Aussie by that name. – Pee Jay 20:53, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All-England Eleven

Hello there, OrangeKnight. Yes, I entirely agree with you. The problem is that Clarke chose a name for his team that was already a generic term and there should be an article specific to his AEE, as it was called, while All-England teams in general should be dealt with by a wider article. All-England teams first appeared in 1739 and I don't know when they finally phased out but it was after Test cricket started.

This All-England article was the first we created but since then there have been others about the UEE, the UNEE and Grace's USEE so we do need to split out the Clarke/Parr team too.

I'll make a note to do something with it but I'm more than happy for you to go ahead and I'll add what I can: I think User:jhall1 (JH) will be interested in this. All the best. --Jack | ^{talk page} 05:11, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work. There aren't too many books covering that era and those two will do the job. I've got Harry Altham's history written in the 1920s and that is good too, so I'll add from that at some point. Otherwise there's S&B but I don't have the volumes covering the 1840s and 1850s. --Jack | ^{talk page} 07:36, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks fot starting the article. When I've the time, I've have a look in my copy of Alan Gibson's The Cricket Captains of England. He interpreted that broadly enough to include Clarke. I'll also look in Barclay's World of Cricket. JH (talk page) 08:40, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Monobook

		The da Vinci Barnstar
		A hundred thanks for the monobook code. A fantastically useful tool to create good cricketer articles and improve articles with depreciated infoboxes. Great stuff, owe you one. SGGH ^ping! 10:58, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vote in WP:CRIC

There has been a issue in WT:CRIC that needs your vote. Thanks --ashwinikalantri ^talk 06:45, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Bailey (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Bailey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jackson

Hi. Here's what Gibson says in "The Cricket Captains of England" (page 91 of my 1989 edition). (He also wrote a book specifically about Jackson, called "Jackson's Year" because the centrepiece is his captaincy of England in 1905. I don't have a copy, but I imagine that second-hand copies shouldn't be too hard to find online.)

Jackson's successful captaincy of Cambridge makes it even odder that he was not chosen, instead of MacLaren, to succeed Grace as the England captain in 1899. Perhaps it was because of an incident in the match of 1893, which engendered many bitter feelings. Cambridge had scored 182, and Oxford were 95-9. The follow-on was then compulsorily imposed if a side was more than 80 runs behind on the first innings. Cambridge did not want to bat last, and Jackson instructed C. M. Wells to bowl wides deliberately, so as to prevent Oxford from following on. As a result of this - and a similar incident in another University match three years later - a bad law was, ultimately, changed; and the follow-on became optional. Why had not one of the last Oxford batsmen thwarted Jackson's plan by knocking down his wicket? Perhaps I may be forgiven for recalling the remark of one long-dead Oxford Blue, who said that only a Cambridge man could ask such a question.

From this distance of time, Jackson's action seems reasonable enough. Nevertheless, it does suggest a toughness of character, a certain ruthlessness behind the genial exterior... He does not seem to have been a particularly popular man, though he was always a deeply respected one. There was also the fact that in the same year (1893), when he was chosen for all three Tests against Australia, Jackson preferred not to play in the last one, because he wanted to play for Yorkshire at Brighton. Yorkshire needed to win that match to make sure of the championship. They won it, and it was their first championship. But even then there were some who questioned his sense of values.

It should, however, always be remembered of the young Jackson that he gave Ranjitsinhji his Blue, a much more controversial thing to do than would seem possible to us now... Jackson had left him out the previous year... and would often comment afterwards, ruefully, about his mistake. I dare say that his experience of India, in one of Hawke's tours in 1892-3, had caused him to revise his views on Indian cricketers and even upon India, a country which he later served as Governor of Bengal. (The last para is mainly on page 92.) JH (talk page) 10:22, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're very welcome. When/if I have time, some of that could probably usefully be added to Jackson's own article (unless you fancy doing it yourself). Since Lord Hawke was Chairman of the England selectors from 1899 to 1909, it seems unlikely that it was Jackson putting Yorkshire ahead of England that was to blame for his not getting the captaincy in 1899. JH (talk page) 10:41, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Noticed this...

I noticed on Jhall1's talk-page that you are taking :fr:enchaînement to GA. Have you considered translating it to English and adding it to what we have here? Although my French is dire, I can see (with a little help from Google!) that it looks good and better than most of what is in the article here. I would imagine it could pass GA quite easily with that level of sourcing. Always good to see you here, by the way! Sarastro1 (talk) 21:31, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds like GA is a little easier over here! I'd be glad to help if you do get a chance to translate. I think we need a greater number of quality articles on the laws. Sarastro1 (talk) 21:53, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:International Cricket Council Hall of Fame inductees has been nominated for discussion

Category:International Cricket Council Hall of Fame inductees, which you created, has been nominated for conversion into a list. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:12, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]