User talk:Orgcaptainnemo

Welcome!

Hello, Orgcaptainnemo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Betty Logan (talk) 22:46, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

thegreatestfilms.com

You have used this source in several articles. It appears to be hobby site without professional editorial oversight which means it is not acceptable to use as a source. Please read WP:SPS for further information. Betty Logan (talk) 22:48, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Vertigo (film) has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information. Please only add material if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Do not add non-notable and self published comments. David J Johnson (talk) 23:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@David J Johnson, Canterbury Tail, and TheOldJacobite: Possible link between this account and that of Tevenson82. They seem to be spamming film articles with links to http://www.thegreatestfilms.com. Everyone I have pinged has reversed an edit by one of these two so I'm just giving you the heads up so we can keep an eye on this. Betty Logan (talk) 01:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@David J Johnson, Betty Logan, and TheOldJacobite: Found another one, Orgcaptainnemo1701. Considering the naming convention and the text that is being inserted I think this is obviously a deliberate spamming attempt using multiple accounts to promote this completely non-notable site. I think it's blacklist and blocking time. Canterbury Tail talk 03:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with that course of action. Good detective work, Betty Logan and Canterbury Tail. ---The Old Jacobite_{The '45} 03:06, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]