User talk:Otanes
Welcome
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Teahouse Invitation
[edit]Hello! Otanes,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 15:52, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
|
Navigational templates
[edit]Hi, you might want to be aware of WP:BIDIRECTIONAL. Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 00:50, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Zoroastrianism
[edit]The article Zoroastrianism you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Zoroastrianism for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of BlackfullaLinguist -- BlackfullaLinguist (talk) 13:20, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
April 2021
[edit]Please do not add or change content, as you did at Zoroastrianism, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:25, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
On aspersions in edit summaries
[edit]I post this because I noticed this edit summary. Please see WP:ASPERSION and WP:SUMMARYNO: accusing editors of tendentious editing and "defacing" (almost an vandalism accusation) should be avoided in edit summaries and article talk pages (WP:FOC). On the other hand, it's possible to warn users on their talk page (WP:WARN) and to report them at an administrator noticeboard as necesary. Often, before that is necessary, discussions at the article's talk page, or on other relevant noticeboards are sufficient. —PaleoNeonate – 23:31, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)