User talk:Outelligent

Copyright problems with Lightworker

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Lightworker, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.shininglite.com/what_is_lightwork.htm. As a copyright violation, Lightworker appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Lightworker has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Lightworker and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Lightworker with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Lightworker.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. ttonyb1 (talk) 22:22, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

September 2009

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Lightworker, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ttonyb1 (talk) 22:21, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How do I re Submit new content ?

I Am having issues submitting information to the lightworker page. I had some information removed for copyright reasons.

I now have new content but can not access the page. What can I do?

--Outelligent (talk) 15:43, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}}

See message below. ∙ AJCham^talk 15:54, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Outelligent, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Lightworker, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 15:53, 8 September 2009 (UTC)∙ AJCham^talk

Salting of Lightworker

Regarding this post at Talk:Lightworker:

I Am having issues submitting information to the lightworker page. I had some information removed for copyright reasons.
I now have new content but can not access the page. What can I do? --Outelligent (talk) 15:16, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

The article name, Lightworker, has been 'salted' - that is protected from recreation, as it is an article that has been repeatedly recreated and deleted as unsuitable. As advised by Ttonyb1, you can create the article at User:Outelligent/Lightworker, and if it meets the criteria for inclusion, an admin can remove the protection and have it moved into main.

However, I would advise consulting the Welcome links, above, before proceeding - in particular, Your First Article.

Also, please do not continue to post messages at Talk:Lightworker - as the talk page of a non-existent article, it is subject to speedy deletion. (WP:CSD#G8)

If you want further help, post a reply here and place the text {{Talkback|Outelligent}}~~~~ on on my talk page to let me know you have replied. (This page is on my watchlist, so I should catch it anyway, but just in case.)

Alternatively, you can place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by a question and any of our helpers, not just me, can assist. Another option is to talk to us live in the Wikipedia help channel by visiting here or here. ∙ AJCham^talk 15:53, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Article Suggested

I am not sure how I get the article moved?

--Outelligent (talk) 17:29, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It does not meet the general notability guideline, as explained in the notice. Articles need references to reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Please see WP:FIRST. Chzz ► 17:35, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have now added references, I am still unsure how I can get this article moved? --Outelligent (talk) 17:59, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The current page is yet another copyright violation, this time of http://www.care2.com/c2c/groups/announcement.html?gpp=16195&pst=1228940&posts=.

Be aware that close paraphrasing does not prevent this being the case. It would be necessary to rewrite the information in your own words - however, I suggest that this would be a waste of your time, as the sources you provide are not adequate, and it seems unlikely that the subject passes the notability guidelines.

I'm sorry, but I think it may be better if you turn your attentions elsewhere. There are many, many articles on which you could help out, and it could be worth getting some practice making small edits before attempting to create an article from scratch. That will give you time to become more familiar with WP policies and customs.

Regards, ∙ AJCham^talk 18:01, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your MedCab Request

Hello! You had requested dispute resolution at the Mediation Cabal. However, this does not appear to be a dispute between you and another user, but rather a case (as you've explained yourself, in the request for mediation) of a new user not fully understanding policy or what is actually expected of him. That being the case, you don't need a mediator, just a friendly face! =P

Basically, in order to meet Wikipedia's requirements for inclusion, material needs to be documented by the types of sources you would use in research for a school paper. These can be academic books, media outlets (newspapers, etc.) or any of a variety of other sources. Material also cannot be copied from another place- you have to rewrite whatever you want to put on Wikipedia in your own words and from a third-person, unbiased perspective. I never saw the Lightworker article before its deletion, so I don't know exactly what you were going for, but if you have any questions or need any help, I'll do my best to be of assistance. Let me know! --Moralis (talk) 14:10, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]