User talk:Paranormal Skeptic/Archives/2009/July
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Ghost Hunters and warnings
Please have a look at WP:NOTVAND, and take on board the content of WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. If you want to discuss why you disagree with WP:LEAD, take it to the article talk page or WT:LEAD. You should also check if the content of any template you choose to use is actually appropriate. Thanks, Verbal chat 16:36, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
User Staggory
Note that Staggory (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is almost certainly a sockpuppet of the banned ResearchEditor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who has a long and vivid history of socking, including recreating the page several times with sockpuppets. Just a bit o' background, I don't expect this round of socking to stop permanently.
Another note, I've tagged the page for speedy deletion again; the EAS have minimal to do with satanic ritual abuse (some of the survey respondants believe they are victims, but that's about it). It's part of a whole constellation of paranoid conspiracy mongering linked to the CIA, torture, dissociative identity disorders and bad therapy; there really isn't a reason to redirect it to any page that I can see, hence the DB tag. The previous deletion debate didn't suggest a redirect, and I don't see much reason either. Thanks, WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 17:01, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- RE's socks are normally nonsense words, and with single-edits only. Thanks for the tip about the account creation log, I didn't even know it existed! WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:simple/complex 19:38, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
La Puppet
great find! thanks! [1] CashRules (talk) 16:14, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
As requested
You said to take my question to your talk page, so here I am. Your user page says you're a "paranormal investigator." I'd be interested to know what that involves exactly. SlimVirgin talk|contribs 02:01, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you, it sounds absolutely fascinating. Do the clients seek you out, or do you respond to stories you read, or to local rumors? Have you had cases where you've not been able to find a physical explanation, and if so, how does that make you feel? SlimVirgin talk|contribs 16:45, 12 July 2009 (UTC)