User talk:Parauleira

Welcome!

Hello, Parauleira, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Atta Community, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! KH-1 (talk) 23:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Atta Community

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Atta Community, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KH-1 (talk) 23:16, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Atta Community for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atta Community is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atta Community until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 20:23, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ramzi Maqdisi

Hi, I see you recently created this article. I am a new page patroller who is reviewing it, and I am concerned: none of the references you provided actually mention the subject of the article— in order for Wikipedia to retain the article, it needs to have multiple reliable independent references to published articles which discuss the subject of this article in depth (i.e., not just as a trivial mention or directory listing). If you aren't able to identify some of these, then the article is likely to be deleted soon. Do you think you can fix these references? Ideally, you want to URL you provide to link to a specific page in a specific publication which supports the claim you are making, not just a link to the publisher's website or the magazine's website. Good luck, and don't delay! Thanks! KDS4444 (talk) 22:41, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ramzi Maqdisi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramzi Maqdisi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramzi Maqdisi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KDS4444 (talk) 15:02, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Parauleira. You used the {{Help me}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{Help me}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access to the channel.

Sorry, I need urgently your help in order not to delete Ramzi Maqdisi's page. I was being accused of adding copyrighted content to Wikipedia which is not true. I did some mistakes while I am working on still on the page: please, how could I manage this nomination deletion? I have the rghts of the picture, and I am collecting several important and updated references to include in this page, but I am not as fast as I would like. Any help please? I will really appreciate

Please ask a specific question, and we can help you. You only need to use the helpme template once, though. --AntiCompositeNumber (Leave a message) 15:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramzi Maqdisi (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Clearly too soon in his career as his filmography still shows such trivial works as "Man", "Priest", "Fighter" and "Refugee"; those are not significant enough works to be included in notability here at all and there's no automatic inherited notability from anything or anyone else, regardless.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

I totally disagree. What about Omar (film) or the other ones with a "name"?

Film and television credits

List of film and television credits
Year	Title	Role	Notes
2012	The Attack (film)	the Priest	Original title: The Attack
2013	Le Joure de l'Homme	Refugee
2013	Omar (film)	Musen Ali Taha	Original title: 'Umar
2014	Giraffada	Fighter
2014	Love, who are you?^[1]	Ramzi	Original title: Habibi, min haida
2015	Love, Theft and Other Entanglements	Kemal	Original title: Al-Hob wa Al-Sariqa wa Mashakel Ukhra
2017	Writing on Snow film	the man
2017	Ghost hunting (film)^[2]	Mohamed Atta	Original title: La Chasse aux fantômes

Also in this page we are talking about someone's career, not just one of the aspects of someone's career. Besides, the references provided are not trivial. I am extremely shocked with these type of arguments about someone's else. And, yes, indeed, I need some help from someone else to defend my work in this community.Parauleira (talk) 08:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ramzi Maqdisi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 22:40, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ramzi Maqdisi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ramzi Maqdisi. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 19:45, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Parauleira. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:07, 6 January 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramzi Maqdisi (January 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Issues discussed at the deletion discussion haven't quite been met - there are a lot of mentions of Maqdisi, but nothing that could be considered significant coverage per the Golden Rule. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ramzi Maqdisi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Primefac (talk) 22:34, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ramzi Maqdisi concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ramzi Maqdisi, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Solomon's Stone (film)

Hello, Parauleira. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Solomon's Stone".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 23:06, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

^ Toledo, Serrana. "Habibi, min haida (English subtitles)". Vimeo. Retrieved 2016-12-19.
^ "film-documentaire.fr – Portail du film documentaire". www.film-documentaire.fr. Retrieved 2016-12-18.

[1] Toledo, Serrana. "Habibi, min haida (English subtitles)". Vimeo. Retrieved 2016-12-19.

[2] "film-documentaire.fr – Portail du film documentaire". www.film-documentaire.fr. Retrieved 2016-12-18.

[1]

[2]