User talk:Parrax

Edit warring on Iranian-Kurdish notable people is ridiculous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.5.135.132 (talk) 19:23, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm Ronaz. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Kianoush Rostami without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ronaz ^Talk! 17:56, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kianoush Rostami Reply

I reverted your edit because you did it without explaining why (in the edit summary and/or the article's talk page. Generally speaking ethnicity can be relevant. It's best to reach consensus about that on the article's talk page. If there are people targeting those articles with disruptive edits you could report them at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ronaz ^Talk! 12:53, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I looked into it a bit further and however I am still unsure whether ethnicity should or should not be part of the article. Strange that nobody noticed the edit warring before. I warned user Tehsojiro on his Talk page. ronaz ^Talk! 10:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I also made a report of the edit war going on where I mentioned you as well on WP:ANI / edit warring. ronaz ^Talk! 10:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've been warned for edit warring at Kianoush Rostami

Please see this closure of a complaint about your edits of Rostami's article. EIther of you may be blocked if you change anything regarding his ethnicity prior to a talk page consensus. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:48, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kianoush Rostami, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 10:14, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Kianoush Rostami shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ronaz ^Talk! 20:47, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kianoush Rostami, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 18:48, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Kianoush Rostami

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Continuation of the edit war about Rostami's Kurdish nationality for which you were warned at the edit warring noticeboard. It appears you have reverted eight times since mid-December. You have no other activiity on Wikipedia recently than warring on this point. This block might be lifted if you will agree to make no more edits about Kurdish matters. EdJohnston (talk) 20:08, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]