User talk:Pasadena91
Pac-10 football, etc
[edit]Pasadena91,
Hello. Thank you for your recent efforts to create all of those Pac-10 football standings templates. I want to point out a few things to you about them and related topics.
- I tagged the discussion pages for those templates with:
{{WikiProject College football}}
. It would be very helpful if you could do the same for any new college football templates, categories, or articles that you create. That will get those articles properly listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject College football and help other editors integrate those new articles into related topics that they may be working on.
- On those standings templates, you're going to want to put
<noinclude>
and</noinclude>
tags around the categories. That way, when these template gets transcended onto other articles, e.g. season and team pages for a particular season, those other pages won't improperly carry those categories from the standings template.
- You recently created the category Category:Pac-10 Conference football. There is no need for this, as Category:Pacific-10 Conference football already exists. I have tagged Category:Pac-10 Conference football for speedy deletion.
Jweiss11 (talk) 19:07, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, just fixed P10 templates with inclusion of noinc. Pasadena91 (talk) 15:15, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Excellent. Keep up the good work. Jweiss11 (talk) 23:54, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Naming for team season articles in the pre-nickname era
[edit]Pasadena91, I just opened up an item at the WikiProject College football talk page regarding naming for team season articles in the pre-nickname era. I think you may be interested as it impacts the Washington Huskies. See: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Naming for team season articles in the pre-nickname era. Thanks. Jweiss11 (talk) 20:24, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
En dashes
[edit]Pasadena91, thanks for your continuing efforts to build out the Washington Huskies football season pages. One little item: you are using en dashes correctly in the article names and to punctuate the scores in the schedule table, but the records in the NCAATeamFootballSeason infobox need them as well. You have been using hyphens there instead. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Dashes for more. Thanks. Jweiss11 (talk) 19:37, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
- Will globally sweep at some point. Just such a circular process to get all of the 19xx P10 Standings built, then the 1936+ AP Poll pages, etc. Thanks for the help and guidance. Pasadena91 (talk) 17:49, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Ronnie Fouch has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable FCS player
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TM 03:43, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Ronnie Fouch for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/42px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ronnie Fouch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronnie Fouch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TM 14:25, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Template:1990 Washington football has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jweiss11 (talk) 04:04, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Template:1984 Washington football has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jweiss11 (talk) 04:42, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)