User talk:Paulina Holzier

Welcome!

Hello, Paulina Holzier, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Lightbluerain (Talk💬 Contribs✏️) 09:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thanx for the cookies Lightbluerain ;-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulina Holzier (talk • contribs) 01:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Holzier (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It seems extremely unlikely that he is notable – the current draft does not show it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Holzier and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 13:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paulina Holzier! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 13:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

he is notable because there are a lot of sources and references surrounding James, because twenty years ago, he had an article created on wikipedia which was deleted, but now twenty years later, he has a Wikipedia article created because of his internet infamy and inside joke created towards him. James deserve an article just like the celebrity number six mystery and the how long will it take mystery and the everyone knows that mystery so i hope you understand that, Bonadea. Thank you!!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulina Holzier (talk • contribs) 01:02, 19 September 2024 (UTC) Paulina Holzier[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Paulina Holzier. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 14:00, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

nah I don't have a conflict of interest with James Holzier. I am just a fan of him and wanted to create an article about him as a part of a ARG surrounding his name. Thanks anyways!!— Preceding unsigned comment added by Paulina Holzier (talk • contribs) 00:55, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your choice of username is almost certainly why Bonadea added the above notification to your user page. In addition, the fact that you're claiming you took the picture of Holzier that you uploaded to Commons to use in the draft is also strongly indicating an WP:APPARENTCOI.

So, if your real name isn't "Paulina Holzier", you should definitely request a username change to avoid any misunderstanding per WP:IMPERSONATE. Similarly, if you're really not connected to Holzier in any personal or professional way but your real name is "Paulina Holzier", you might want to consider requesting a username change to avoid confusion or having your identity verified per WP:REALNAME.

Just for reference, a conflict of interest would apply to you as a person and not simply this one particular account or your choice of username; moreover, others are likely going to be more willing to want to help you the more transparent you're about any connection you have to Holzier. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:33, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My real first name is indeed Paulina, its just that I replaced my last name with James' last name in order to protect my privacy. And I am not connected to him either at all (a lot of fans do this for some reason because its cool lol)

I am just taking a part of an alternate reality game associated with James in some way, in order to put an end to the Matthew community, who make fake NSFW content of famous women celebrities of any sort on the internet, like creating fake pornos out of these women as if though the Matthews are doing the nasty with them naked and stuff like that, and creating sex dolls out of these women to make it seem like they have a extremely close connection to them, when in reality, they are not, the Matthew community is unstable and unhinged and I am happy to see this thread Noku Pireleis (who is the creator of the Fartbag ARG) created on the Matthew community altogether.

Read the x thread and you will see why I am taking a part of it anyways! So I hope James will be added on this wiki soon. Good luck and have the rest of your day!!

https://twitter.com/noku_pireleis/status/1833977713813848250 Paulina Holzier (talk) 03:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have certainly chosen a misleading user name, so don't be surprised if other editors query this.

Can you tell me how you know all the information contained in Draft:James Holzier if, as you say, you have no relationship with the subject? Most of it is unreferenced, so I'm wondering where it all came from? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:24, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It all came from Gawker and Reddit trying to expose him for making a inside joke/hoax about himself as a famous actor. Also I am not James' sister, i am just a person who is creating a wikipedia article about the things he did online in the 2000s. Thank you Paulina Holzier (talk) 17:42, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying this, Paulina. The reason I asked was indeed your user name. Like DoubleGrazing, I'm interested to know where the information in the draft came from. --bonadea contributions talk 07:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Paulina Holzier. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:18, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Holzier (September 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Mostly unreferenced, with no evidence of notability (per either WP:GNG or WP:NACTOR).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James Holzier and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Cullen328 (talk) 07:48, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paulina Holzier (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry if I ruined the wikipedia. I will try to change my username to my real last name or to anything else so I don't ever get blocked ever again. I still wanted to work on the JH article soon, so fingers crossed for that to be finished very soon! Paulina Holzier (talk) 17:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't believe that unblocking you to allow you to continue to edit the same topic area would benefit the encyclopedia. Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:46, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) You don't need to disclose your real surname; just don't assume someone else's.

And if you manage to get yourself unblocked, I would suggest you drop this topic, and write about other things that have no connection to why you got blocked. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay sorry about that Paulina Holzier (talk) 17:59, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BTW not at you saying that bs word in wikipedia, I thought this was a family friendly PG rated website, you didnt need to ruin it with the cussing User:Cullen328, sorry if I made you very angry that you decided to say that word because you hated the draft article I made which caused you to go nuts and say the not so cute word bull sugar, I just wanted to do this as a part of an ARG, no hate needed in this website, I'm sorry!! Paulina Holzier (talk) 18:03, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not censored nor "family friendly", but it is an encyclopedia, not a platform for alternative reality games. --bonadea contributions talk 18:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Your talk page access has been revoked. Please read WP:UTRS. Cullen328 (talk) 19:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, Cullen328, I didn't realize that this hoaxer and BLP violator was blocked already--thanks for taking care of that. You too, Ponyo. I just trashed that BS draft. Drmies (talk) 02:11, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Drmies, my tolerance level for these bizarre games and associated "alternate reality" content is close to zero. I hate to sound like an old fogey, but there are countless places for jerking around on the internet. Just not Wikipedia. Cullen328 (talk) 02:19, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]