User talk:Penbay

Image copyright problem with Image:Celebrator.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Celebrator.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 15:10, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Image:Celebrator.jpg. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If the copyright holder is someone else, you cannot upload under free-use tags! VegitaU 15:19, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Celebrator.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Celebrator.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. VegitaU 15:19, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Celebrator.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Celebrator.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. VegitaU 15:19, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Samizu Matsuki

Hello Penbay. Thank you for creating the article Samizu Matsuki, which appears to be both interesting and an appropriate one to be included in Wikipedia. I have done a little work on it to make it more in the style used by Wikipedia and may do some more. However, Wikipedia is very keen that what is written is sourced and can be verified by the reader. Newspaper and magazine feature articles, books, and so on, are appropriate. Online ones are especially convenient but of course not always available. Would you be able to add sources to the article? If you have difficulty, place the sources on the talk page and I will do what I can to help. Kind regards. --Malcolmxl5 22:04, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Samizu Matsuki - provenance references

Friends As originator of the Samizu Matsuki entry, I am challenged with certain barriers to obtaining provenance of some of the references for Samizu Matsuki biographical entry. I would greatly appreciate any assistance in following up on them. Several are described below; I will supply the leads to others in a future posting and as requested. I hope this format I am using is appropriate. Thanks! Ron Huber aka Penbay.

Education at Women's College of Fine Arts (WCFA) This is now within the larger Joshibi http://www.joshibi.ac.jp/index_e.html Note the creation of the Women's College of Fine Arts in the 1949 reference on http://www.joshibi.ac.jp/e/aboutjoshibi/history/

There is an alumni website, http://www.joshibidosokai.net/index.html It is in Japanese and I can't read it. Links there must point to the reference person or entity. If that could be accessed by one with a Japanese-reading computer, Samizu's attendance there could be verified.

Union Membership in the Tokyo Teachers Union, in 1960. This fact must exist in document form in that union's archives.

Artist Memberships: Salmagundi Club & Allied Artists of America Salmagundi Club http://www.salmagundi.org/ Allied Artists of America -- not yet added to her biography. http://www.alliedartistsofamerica.org/about_us.htm

The office of each of these will have a record of Samizu's membership in that 1970s era. I have not been able to interact successfully to obtain the necessary membership references from them.

Painting Locations: While the ownership and location of two of her works, Ah and Celebrator, are known to be Cristina Chan Johnston of Huntingtown, Maryland, the present ownership of others is less clear. Here is the lead for the painting Triumphal Return

Triumphal Return's last known owner: Andrew Delaney. He was the model for the painting. He was living in upper middle class Long Island New York at time of purchase of painting in 1970s. In 1989 or '90, contacted in Reno, Nevada by Cristina Johnston, Delaney confirmed by telephone continued ownership of Triumphal Return. He also told Samizu by telephone he was leading an sort of movement devoted to the paranormal that had "500 members" in the Reno area. Reno newspapers or other media of that time might have a reference to him and his group as a local oddity. Delaney told Samizu during that call, that he used her name Samizu as their organization's 'keyword'.

Signed her 1970s paintings as "Samizu" Signed several minor paintings created in Maryland in late 80's early 90s with "S. Matsuki" and "S. Huber".

Samizu's parents as educators. School records and other government records in Hokkaido suffered far less loss than those of many other parts of Japan. Hence many of the records described below about Samizu's Father Satoru Matsuki, spouse Masue and their family, including daughter Samizu, are very likely locatable in the towns and cities herein described. The following details are given in hope of enabling the interested in assisting locating important documentation of Samizu and her parents.

Father & Mother. Satoru Matsuki graduated from the Normal School in Asahikawa, Hokkaido, in the early 1930s, with good grades. If you graduated with good grades, it was mandatory that one teach for at least two years. Satoru became a teacher at the Uryu elementary school, where he met and married Masue Matuki. Masue graduated from a small women's 'college' in 1935. Got teaching job in Uryu where Satoru was teaching; quit job once married to raise family.

Satoru belonged to a pacifist organization in the 1930s, apparently called "Jonin". He had to go underground as persecution rose. Members went into hiding. Many were caught and jailed. A fellow teacher in Uryu elementary school was tortured and killed. This name may come available. The Hokkaido records of the Kempeitai, the secret police of wartime Japan's will likely have a record of Satoru Matsuki and family.

Satoru Matsuki Post War. Because of Macarthur's purging of the Japanese educational system of teachers and schoolmasters that actively collaborated with the Tojo wartime government by advocating militarism, imperialism and emperor worship, many educational positions came open to pacifists.

In 1946 he became into vice schoolmaster in Abira, in Eburi precinct southern Hokkaido; a year later became second youngest schoolaster in Japan, as schoolmaster to a thrice bigger school in Ueno, also in Uberi Precinct. He was later school master in Shiraoi. He left schoolmastering and set up educational research center in Noboribetsu, to propagate progressive western educational concepts. The name of organization may come available

He wrote a book on the Ainu, titled translation: "Warriors in the North". Written after retirement, it describes the integration of Hokkaido into Japan, including transactions about education between Japanese government and Ainu Kingdom leaders. Samizu's sister, a resident of New York City, has donated a copy of the book to the New York Library; it may be accessible via their database

Please let me know if any leads emerge to help me obtain these and other documentation

Samizu Matsuki - source on her 'grand prix' award located.

A 4/22/71 newspaper article (the Locust Valley Leader) documenting Matsuki's winning the Grand Prix at the 1971 Locust Valley Art Show on Long Island, New York is on its way to me, courtesy of the Locust Valley Library. This will be digitized and a link to the news article will be added where apppropriate to her wiki bio page by Friday latest. Penbay

Greetings, Penbay. Thank you for your work on this article. Samizu appears to me to be notable for her artwork, which flourished in the early 1970s and for which she received a number of awards. I would suggest then that you focus the article on this and particularly seek citations for the awards that she received. Having said that, you appear to have this well in hand and my comments are largely redundant! Kind regards. --Malcolmxl5 22:05, 17 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Located documentary materials for Samizu Matsuki's New York art show wins in 1970 and 1971

At Samizu's suggestion, I ordered a copy of the book: "Artists/USA 1972-73 - Guide to Contemporary Art." Published by Artists/USA, Inc. Feasterville, PA 19047. Library of Congress Catalog Number 78134303. ISSN: 0196-6154

The book includes on page 120 a photograph of her work "A Triumphal Return" accompanied by short summary of her awards and locations of exhibition and gallery placement of her works. She is also listed in the books index of artists on page 213.

I have scanned relevant sections from the book: title page, table of contents, foreword, samizu's entry page and index page with Samizu listed, and made them available on Samizu Matsuki's external website. RH

License tagging for Image:Triumphal Return.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Triumphal Return.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:12, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Samizu: Salmagundi Club bona fides arrive from Club.

Have received following documentary information from Robert Mueller, chairman, curatorial committee of the Salmagundi Club, Greenwich Village, NYC.

11/06/07 Letter to Ron Huber from Bob Mueller, a curator of the Salmagundi Club, confirming Matsuki's past membership, and copies of:

11/2/73 Samizu's filled out Club application for membership form dated November 2, 1973; 11//2/73 Kenneth Fitch, Admissions committee asks Kenneth W. Fitch(?) for his review of Matsuki's qualification to be approved a member of Salmagundi Club. Filled out. 11//2/73 two similar requests to Michael J. Hughes and William _________(illegible). Filled out.

11/12/73 Letter from Maurice Silber, Chairman, Admissions Committee of the Salmagundi Club, requesting Matsuki send three art samples to Mr. Luis Llorente, V. Chairman, Art Committee.

12/10/73 Letter from John N. Lewis, President, Salmagundi Club, congratulating her on being accepted as a 'Resident artist' at the Club.

9/17/76. Samizu Matsuki resignation letter to Salmagundi Club.

10/08/76 Letter from Salmagundi Club corresponding secretary Ruth Reininghaus, accepting her resignation.

I will likely add only a few of these documents' images to Samiz Matsuki wiki bio entry. Ron Huber 05:19, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sears Island: Environmental controvereis

I added a note about your recent edits on the talk page: you may wish to respond. ElijahBosley ^{(talk ☞)} 18:11, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:"Ah", Samizu Matsuki, oil painting, 1974.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:"Ah", Samizu Matsuki, oil painting, 1974.jpg, which you've sourced to Samizu Matsuki. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:22, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Triumphal Return.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Triumphal Return.jpg, which you've sourced to Samizu Matsuki. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Celebrator.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Celebrator.jpg, which you've sourced to Samizu Matsuki. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 22:24, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Samizu shimura daisan jrhighschooltokyo 1960.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Samizu shimura daisan jrhighschooltokyo 1960.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:18, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your input is requested at WikiProject Maine!

	Hello fellow WikiProject Maine members!

I'm trying to breathe a little new life into WP:WP ME and as such I have posted a few questions on the project's talk page that I would like to get some feedback from all of the project's members on! There are apparently a lot of inactive members on our participants list (and even a user that has been blocked for years). What do we as a project want to do about inactive or blocked users? I have some ideas on the issue, but would love feedback from others. Remove blocked users that appear to be no longer interested in participating in developing Wikipedia. Users with zero activity at all in three years are unlikely to come back. I suggest that we remove them from the mailing list and deactivate any categorizing feature of a userbox on their page. When doing this, we must make sure to leave a note on their talk page explaining that since they have been off-wiki for three years that they have been removed from the list as a purely technical measure and they are more than welcome to add themselves back to the list if they choose to start editing again. Users with zero activity on wiki for 18 months may come back, despite it being unlikely. I would suggest that we mark those users as inactive on our mailing list, and stop sending them messages like this one to prevent their user talk page from filling up with irrelevant notices. Users with zero activity on wiki for at least six months should be marked as inactive in the mailing list template, but should still receive mailings. I'm also trying to gauge some interest in there being a Great American Wikinic in Maine! If you are interested, possible locations might include Portland, Augusta, and or Bangor, please make a note in the appropriate section on our talk page! We should create a template to use for mass mailings from this wikiproject so all we need to do is enter our message and signature and the general format of the box and image and title and stuff will stay familiar. What is your opinion on this idea? Do you have any preferences to what that may look like (because I think this looks horrible compared to some I've seen from other projects)?
This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U\|Technical 13}} ^{(e • t • c)} at 17:25, 11 June 2014 (UTC). To remove yourself from this list, please remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiProject Maine/members, remove the WikiProject's userbox/category from your user page (rarely used for mass mailings), or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Penobscot Bay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Searsport. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Penbay. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Penbay. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Juniper Ridge Landfill moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Juniper Ridge Landfill, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 10:31, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Juniper Ridge Landfill

Hello, Penbay. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Juniper Ridge Landfill, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Noboribetsu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Classical realism. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Juniper Ridge Landfill

Hello, Penbay. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Juniper Ridge Landfill".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:36, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samizu longislnybeach75.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Samizu longislnybeach75.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:04, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Juniper Ridge Landfill (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sole referencing appears to be about a recent fire. It needs to be broadened to include all facts about it. Much is unreferenced

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Juniper Ridge Landfill and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:26, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Penbay! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:26, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]