User talk:PenguinsElite

Can you hurry up and undo your vandalism to Doctor Who (series 10)? Earthscent (talk) 20:04, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PenguinsElite, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi PenguinsElite! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Work with Chris Harris

Hi PenguinsElite. I am the creator of the Chris Harris Wikipedia page and appreciate your work on the article and on other Harris related articles. Feel free to contact me at mpmacintosh@gmail.com whenever you want! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mpmacintosh (talk • contribs) 21:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Steven Beale has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 18:46, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Emmerdale characters (2011). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: List of Emmerdale characters (2011) was changed by PenguinsElite (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871285 on 2016-06-17T18:28:14+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:28, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joe Weller (YouTube)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Joe Weller (YouTube) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 21:22, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Jay Leno's Garage, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:38, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Cody Walker (actor). 4TheWynne^{(talk)(contribs)} 12:25, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JasonDaweTopGear2002.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JasonDaweTopGear2002.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 20:22, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that non-free images are not permitted in the infoboxes of biographies of living persons as they violate the first criteria of our non-free content policy in that there is a reasonable expectation that a free image of a living person could be obtained. --AussieLegend (✉) 20:25, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Splitting articles

When splitting articles, it is a requirement that proper attribution be provided per WP:CWW. When you split content from Jay Leno's Garage to List of Jay Leno's Garage episodes you did not provide the required attribution, which constitutes a copyright violation. Please note that, per MOS:TV, we do not generally create episode list articles until season 2 of a series commences airing. --AussieLegend (✉) 21:04, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Nut Job 2 Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Nut Job 2 Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 20:11, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Top Gear (series 24) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Top Gear (series 24). Since you had some involvement with the Top Gear (series 24) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Alex|The|Whovian^? 15:11, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Grand Tour (series 1)

Please stop recreating The Grand Tour (series 1). It is far too early for such an article. The normal process for TV article creation is to create the main series article and add series one content there. When series 2 episode information is available, and if substantial content is available for series 2, then List of The Grand Tour episodes will be created. At some time, when that article becomes too large, we then look at creating individual series articles. We certainly do NOT create individual series articles even before the first episode airs. --AussieLegend (✉) 18:03, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just because you have created a draft of this article doesn't mean that content should be removed from the main article. Please do not do so again. As it stands, your draft is extremely premature; a series 1 article will probably not be required for at least a year. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:41, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Rory Reid Linkedln.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Rory Reid Linkedln.jpeg, which you've attributed to https://uk.linkedin.com/in/rory-reid-53410132. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 19:28, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rory Reid Linkedln.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rory Reid Linkedln.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 19:34, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at The Grand Tour (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. AussieLegend (✉) 16:30, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just to refersh your memeory, I warned you about removing this content from the article above. To remove the content again, without any explanation whatever, is inexcusable. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:33, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@PenguinsElite: This is to let you know that your recent edit to Top Gear (series 18) were reverted. Moving information about the airing of the Series' specials and episodes from the Lead paragraph into a Production section made no sense, as Production should contain information about the filming of the series, not about the specials' airing dates. In future, think carefully about what you are doing. I've seen the above message, and you may wish to be careful with future editing. GUtt01 (talk) 21:28, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at K.C. Undercover. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Amaury (talk | contribs) 17:57, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mark Whitten, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malevolent. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Nut Job 2 Poster.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Nut Job 2 Poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Tom Holland CACW.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Tom Holland CACW.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:17, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doctor Who (series 10)

Please explain your move of Doctor Who (series 10) to Draft:Doctor Who (series 10). There is enough production information to make this a valid article; an unknown premiere date does not mean the article has to be a draft. You should have discussed this on the talk page first. I have requested a revert on your move, by submitting a speedy delete on the new redirect at the former page, to move the latter page back where it belongs. Alex|The|Whovian^? 13:25, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to undo your crazy edits to Doctor Who series 10 any way I can. Earthscent (talk) 13:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Earthscent: Pardon? Do you have any idea what is going on? Alex|The|Whovian^? 13:53, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was talking to PenguinsElite, not you. And no, I have no idea what's going on. I assume PenguinsElite is psycho, but that's just a guess.Earthscent (talk) 13:54, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 1 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Draft:Top Gear (series 24) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Caleb Walker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cody Walker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at The Voice (U.S. TV series).

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. livelikemusic talk! 23:40, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Top Gear Italia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Caravan and Cesare Cremonini. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Chrisharrisoncarslogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Chrisharrisoncarslogo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BBC Chris Harris On Cars Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BBC Chris Harris On Cars Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

G7

Please review the criteria for WP:G7. Draft:Top Gear (series 24) was ineligible for multiple reasons. The draft had multiple contributors. You were not the "only" author despite adding substantial content after another editor wiped out the previous draft, made by yet another editor, and turned it into a redirect. Mkdw ^talk 20:32, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ted Reilly

added a link pointing to Casualty

Top Gear Australia (series 2)

added a link pointing to James Morrison

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:X Factor Next Generation.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:X Factor Next Generation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:31, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:X Factor Next Generation.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:X Factor Next Generation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The X Factor

Hi, can you please not remove symbols from tables as you did here. The symbols are necessary for the article to comply with WP:COLOUR ("Ensure that color is not the only method used to convey important information. Especially, do not use colored text or background unless its status is also indicated using another method such as an accessible symbol matched to a legend, or footnote labels. Otherwise, blind users or readers accessing Wikipedia through a printout or device without a color screen will not receive that information."), which is meant to apply to the whole of Wikipedia. If you have a valid reason why the article shouldn't comply, other than "it looks messy" (not a valid reason), please let me know. If you wanted to do something useful, you could help add the symbols to the other articles. Thanks. anemone projectors 14:07, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, PenguinsElite. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rose Wood Academy

This former school article is now a redirect but originally referred to a non-notable primary school which would normally be deleted at WP:AFD as per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES Please don't restore the article without well sourced references to show notability. Thanks CalzGuy (talk) 21:10, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Voice UK

Hi, please provide a source for the start date of The Voice UK (series 6). Thanks. MSalmon (talk) 22:58, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mark Whitten

The article Mark Whitten has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article does not meet WP:GNG, most of the information is taken from iMDB which violates WP:USERG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ULTRA-DARKNESS^{:) 2 CHAT} 14:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Bill Hughes (producer)

Hi, I'm MordeKyle. PenguinsElite, thanks for creating Bill Hughes (producer)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. IMDb is not a reliable source per WP:RS/IMDB

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. {MordeKyle} ☢ 23:21, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Top Gear (series 24) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Top Gear (series 24) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top Gear (series 24) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. T v x1 21:25, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Top Gear (series 24)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Top Gear (series 24), PenguinsElite!

Wikipedia editor Montanabw just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This article was nominated for deletion, please note the discussion there

To reply, leave a comment on Montanabw's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Untitled Amazon motoring show listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled Amazon motoring show. Since you had some involvement with the Untitled Amazon motoring show redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 18:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GT (TV series) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect GT (TV series). Since you had some involvement with the GT (TV series) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 18:10, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. livelikemusic talk! 21:26, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's unfair to give a level 4 warning straight off, especially when I have never witnessed any vandalism from PenguinsElite, but only the opposite. You're meant to start at level 1 and work your way up. The only edit I can find from PenguinsElite that was reverted by livelikemusic is this, which is most definintely not vandalism. I would say the above warning was given in bad faith. anemone projectors 22:41, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They've received multiple warnings overtime concerning the edits they've been making for a while now. livelikemusic talk! 22:49, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Honey G Show

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Honey G Show requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - GB fan 22:48, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Your addition to David Nugent has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:18, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at The Voice (Australian TV series). livelikemusic talk! 23:29, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please stop continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Fame Academy, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 19:31, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Top Gear (series 24) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. AussieLegend (✉) 05:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Voice of Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Kennedy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:53, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

PenguinsElite (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17902 was submitted on Mar 28, 2017 18:45:43. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:45, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to David Nugent. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:42, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Voice UK, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jamie Miller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at File:David Nugent Playing For Derby County.png. Yet another copyright infringement. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:52, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Hello PenguinsElite! I've had to remove the plot summary you added to The Great Gatsby (2000 film) because it came from IMDB and is therefore copyrighted. You can't copy any text you find on the internet into a Wikipedia article unless it is marked as Free. Even if there's not a "Copyright 2017" type notice, that's not good enough. It has to actually say Free to use, reuse, etc before it can be used here.

I see you've been warned about this many times above. I also note that you've never responded to a single message on this page. This is not good, as I don't know if you're just not seeing the messages, not understanding all the technical terms, or what. So please, respond to me here and let me know that you understand our policy on Copyright (you can click HERE to read it), and that you'll abide by it. Otherwise I fear one more such copying will result in you being blocked until you do acknowledge the concerns and agree to abide by them. And nobody wants that to happen.

I know copyright is a remarkably complex issue, so please feel free to ask me anything about it and I'll try my best to help out. But please do respond here to say that you've seen this. Thanks! Crow^Caw 22:01, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mateo Castellanos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tim Healy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hacker T. Dog

added a link pointing to Andy Heath

Humphrey Goodman

added a link pointing to Death in Paradise

Twelfth Doctor

added a link pointing to Typecast

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Faith of the Furious for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Faith of the Furious is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Faith of the Furious until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 20:46, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Grand Tour Series 1 Poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Grand Tour Series 1 Poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Top Gear 2002 Hosts.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Top Gear 2002 Hosts.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytoyoda (talk) 11:32, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Craig Shakespeare, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yet another copyright infringement. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:53, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:X Factor Next Generation.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:X Factor Next Generation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:22, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Be Unblocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PenguinsElite (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My block period has expired

Decline reason:

It will today at 17:22 (UTC). Favonian (talk) 17:07, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PenguinsElite (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My block was due to expire earlier today but has been extended until tomorrow. (I'm very unhappy about this!)

Decline reason:

You were blocked for 72 hours. The block has by now expired, exactly at the time it was supposed to. Huon (talk) 18:38, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

my block's expired!

My block was due to expire at 11:54 on 4 June 2017. It's past that time now and I am unable to edit articles, with my block still there. I wish for it to be removed with immediate affect.

Thanks - User:PenguinsElite

Does your "Blocked" message include an autoblock number? Your account isn't blocked but your IP may be caught up in an autoblock. Crow^Caw 20:19, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ryan Catterick

The article Ryan Catterick has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subjects fails WP:NFOOTBALL as has not played in a fully professional league, and no indication topic has received enough coverage to satisfy WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:24, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Your addition to Garry Monk has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:42, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrights - Your attention needed

Hello PenguinsElite. I see you've uploaded another photo from the Internet (File:Garry_Monk_Swansea_City_Manager_2014.jpg) only to have it tagged for copyright, which it is. The source you gave specifically sources it to Getty Images, and there is no free release noted. I hate to say this, but you're on thin ice regarding copyrights... you've been warned many times above and blocked at least once for repeatedly adding copyrighted stuff. You need to stop doing this, or I fear your next block may be indefinite.

Copyright is one of those things that we have to be strict on, as it has potential legal implications for Wikipedia. You've got good enthusiasm, and I'd hate to see you blocked over something like this. Copyright is a complicated area to understand, and I'm sure you're just not realizing when you're crossing that line. So please accept this advice... follow these couple of steps and you are sure to steer clear of further issues:

Don't copy any text into any article that you found on the internet, or even read somewhere. Write everything in your own words. Imagine that you're explaining it to a friend at lunch, and write it like that. It may not be perfect the first time, but that's no problem and is easily fixed. And if it's in your own words, there's no copyright concern.
Don't upload any images that you find on the internet. At all. Every photo taken these days is automatically copyrighted, even if it doesn't say so. In order for us to use those, the owner has to specifically release it under a specific set of licenses. Until you understand all those nuances, the best way to go is not to upload any images from the internet. If you find one that you think is ok to use, even then don't upload it, but ask someone on the talk page to see if it is ok. You can even ask me if nobody is answering. The pic might be a lot better than the one you're replacing, but if it is copyrighted, then we still can't use it.
In general, if you're not sure whether something is ok to use, then don't use it, but rather ask someone first.

If you do all of these, you're sure to be ok with copyright issues. Feel free to ask me anything, thanks! Crow^Caw 18:40, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Jason Steele (footballer). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Unsourced career stats. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:32, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Careers stats tables

Hi, please note that the table format for career stats tables has been put together by consensus at WT:FOOTY, and is on display at WP:FOOTY/Players. To aid accessibility, it is recommended that the division cells are repeated. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 18:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ben Gibson. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kind regards MJ ^☕ 12:17, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PenguinsElite (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block length is too long and I believe that for the reasons I have been blocked for, I should be able to edit articles again, as I should have only been blocked for one week. Thank you. :)

Decline reason:

You were blocked for persistently adding unsourced content. You haven't addressed this in your unblock request, so there are no grounds here to consider lifting your block. You have to show that none of your recent edits were unsourced. Yamla (talk) 12:08, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

PenguinsElite (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #18887 was submitted on Aug 01, 2017 19:02:37. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 19:02, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:X Factor Next Generation.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:X Factor Next Generation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The X Factor (U.S. season 4)

Hello, PenguinsElite. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The X Factor".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 19:44, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PenguinsElite (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I waited until I was initially due to be unblocked on 5 August 2017. I left the account alone for over another two weeks, before discovering that I have been blocked until 4 November 2017. I am outraged by this and I wish to be unblocked. Thank you! :)

Decline reason:

Outraged, huh? It's evident from this edit that you are not currently blocked. Favonian (talk) 19:50, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Where have you got 4 November 2017 from? Your account is not blocked! Mattythewhite (talk) 18:09, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Adam Reach, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.

The "source" you added was a dead link – the site linked has been down for months – and wouldn't have verified the content you added even if it had been live. Struway2 (talk) 07:45, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:X Factor Next Generation.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:X Factor Next Generation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Acklam-park2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Acklam-park2.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 23:15, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Jordan Rhodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:30, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The Voice UK, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your continued addition of unsourced information, or information that defies Wikipedia's policies despite your continued blocks, is troubling. Refrain from this editing behaviour. livelikemusic talk! 12:10, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PenguinsElite (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am outraged at being blocked, I added sourced content, which has officially been confirmed.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.

Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:40, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PenguinsElite (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I now understand why I have been blocked. I am wanting to be unblocked, please. I will prevent this from happening again by stop adding un-full-sourced content.

Decline reason:

Too little, too late. Given this account's history, you're going to have to come up with a much better unblock appeal. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:54, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PenguinsElite (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have apologised previously, and I believe I should be unblocked. I did not even add unsourced content: I added information provided with a source. Please unblock me.

Decline reason:

This does not address the reasoning for the block, and as stated above, I do not feel that your behavior will adjust enough to prevent another block. As it stands the block should stay in place. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:14, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PenguinsElite (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block should be removed. I added unsourced content, which will not happen again.

Decline reason:

Posting a string of unblock requests which alternately deny and assert that you have added unsourced content does nothing whatever to give the impression that you take the matter seriously. Both for this block and for previous blocks you have posted totally unconstructive unblock requests, which all put together begin to look rather like trolling, so don't be surprised if one more pointless unblock request leads to your talk page access being removed. Administrators have better things to do with their time than closing ridiculous unblock requests that never had a chance of succeeding. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 23:04, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PenguinsElite (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to be unblocked now! I'm very annoyed now! If I'm not unblocked, I will report Wikipedia!!!! :( }

Decline reason:

That can only be interpreted as a legal threat and I shall therefore block you indefinitely without talk page access. You may try the WP:Unblock Ticket Request System, but you should first consider your strategy very carefully. Favonian (talk) 13:47, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

PenguinsElite (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20307 was submitted on Jan 12, 2018 17:24:18. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:24, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Strictly Come Dancing (series 15)

Hello, PenguinsElite. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Strictly Come Dancing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 16:26, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

This user has engaged in block evasion as 81.106.37.17 (talk · contribs) in December, 2018. --Yamla (talk) 14:13, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Continued, checkuser-confirmed, block evasion in February, 2019. --Yamla (talk) 18:21, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Top Gear USA Season 1 DVD Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Top Gear USA Season 1 DVD Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Top Gear USA Season 1 DVD Cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Top Gear USA Season 1 DVD Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Grand Tour (series 1)

Hello, PenguinsElite. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Grand Tour".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Mjs1991 (talk) 05:06, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Top Gear America S1.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Top Gear America S1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:X Factor Next Generation.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:X Factor Next Generation.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mark Whitten

The article Mark Whitten has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Andre🚐 07:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Mark Whitten

Hello PenguinsElite, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Mark Whitten, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Whitten.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Andrevan}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Andre🚐 15:36, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]