User talk:Pensees

Welcome!

Hello, Pensees, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Eldereft ~(s)talk~ 16:41, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of BioInitiative Report

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article BioInitiative Report, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?CaneryMBurns (talk) 21:23, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Electromagnetic hypersensitivity, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Drive by tagging such as this is highly discouraged. You have not added new points to the discussion, only reiterated old ones. Phone masts are not directly relevant to EHS (see talk and archives), and this is already discussed on the mobile phone health page. Please try to discuss before tagging. SesquipedalianVerbiage (talk) 06:30, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notification, yet remember that I had already justified in many places the insertion of the NPOV tag to the EHS article. My responses as to why the article is NPOV can be read in the talk page, in the Mobile Phone Base Station, Double-blind Tests, and Lead and Bioinitiative sections as well as the section about the NPOV tag. Removing sections that support EHS, giving 'undue weight' to sections against EHS, and not accepting criticisms against double-blind studies, seems hardly NPOV, and readers should be warned about it. The NPOV tag urges not to remove the tag until the conflict had been resolved. Unfortunately, it is still unresolved. Pensees (talk) 01:41, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It has been resolved to the satisfaction of the community. You do not outweigh consensus. If you have new points, please raise them on the talk page. --SesquipedalianVerbiage (talk) 07:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Electromagnetic hypersensitivity. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Verbal chat 06:32, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also to Wireless electronic devices and health. As it says on the talk page, gain consensus for large additions and changes to tone and balance first. Verbal chat 06:36, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Electromagnetic hypersensitivity. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Please from now on do not edit the page without FIRST discussing your edits on the talk page to reach wp:consensus, unless it is to revert OBVIOUS vandalism. Thanks. Verbal chat 07:19, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree that my edits are vandalism. The article is unbalanced because you and other editors keep removing evidence for the health effects of wireless technologies, making the article one-sided. I have repeatedly provided reasonable arguments in the talk archives of the article and you and other editors have repeatedly provided questionable reasons to remove my statements, such as claiming irrelevance of things which are strongly relevant, and questioning sources that other editors also support. Pensees (talk) 02:44, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]