User talk:Persian-iran

Welcome

Hello, Persian-iran, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Persian-iran, good luck, and have fun. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:56, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Persian-iran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This (Special:Diff/811734212) is just a bad reference. I am a fa.wikipedia.org user, Jimmy Wells knows this (Special:Diff/811182865) Persian-iran (talk) 11:41 am, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. GAB^gab 17:25, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Jimbo Wales: Please say that I am a Farsi user. thank you--Persian-iran (talk) 16:51, 23 November 2017 (UTC)I can speak Persian:من می توانم فارسی حرف بزنم لطفا باور کنید--Persian-iran (talk) 16:52, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jasper Deng: Hey, I saw thatSpecial:Diff/811740107--Persian-iran (talk) 17:17, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BITE

User:GeneralizationsAreBad This is WP:DONTBITE. thank you:( But please tell me why block --Persian-iran (talk) 17:40, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Persian-iran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Read up and down

Decline reason:

You're quite obviously a sock of someone, and you are not using your talk page to address the reasons for your block. I'm revoking talk page access. Feel free to appeal to ArbCom or via UTRS. TonyBallioni (talk) 06:06, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

One day later.

@Jpgordon: Did you block me without warning (The right reason: WP:ADMINACCT)?!.

@GeneralizationsAreBad: As a user of fa.wikipedia.org, I know the rules well, but do you think I am a en.wiki user who use multiple accounts?! Do you see Special:Diff/811740281 Everyone knows I am an Iranian user.I am not this person . In fact, I blocked you without reason.This blockade may be bureaucracy. You can even contact my teammate in fa.wiki

I said all the necessary reasons. Unfortunately, I will go to Arbitration Committee if my account is not opened.--Persian-iran (talk) 05:58, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

TonyBallioni (talk) 06:07, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Only includes results from America and Iran.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Persian-iran/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 12:35, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Persian-iran, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! » Shadowowl | talk 12:35, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Persian-iran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19869 was submitted on Nov 27, 2017 07:05:42. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 07:05, 27 November 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Persian-iran (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19875 was submitted on Nov 28, 2017 05:15:41. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 05:15, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS access

Note that due to repeated unsuccessful appeals via UTRS I have revoked Persian-iran's access for six months and have provided them with information on how to pursue the Standard Offer after the six months should they choose to do so.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:56, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]