User talk:PeterRet

Thank you for your great contributions to the articles about the Turiec region. Tankred 05:07, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vanity

Is this page vanity or not: Mikhail Lebedev --GoOdCoNtEnT 07:59, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiSk template

Hello,

I have recently founded a template which can be used on their user pages by those, who contribute to the Slovak Wikipedia as well. If you do and if you are interested, you can have a look at Template:User wikisk. Jan.Kamenicek 22:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Podbradníkovec

Hi. If you have the opportunity to cast your eye over this article (which I think is in Slovak, rather than Czech) to let us know what to make of it, that would be really helpful. It's up for AfD at the moment, but obviously we don't want to delete something that will be keep-worthy if translated. Ďakujem in advance. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 12:08, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mošovce

（ja:モショヴツェ） Hello! Thank you for your briefing. I think that this problem is solved now. I am going to remove the deletion tag, seeing a situation about one week. By the way, when I asked about pronunciation last time, the inquiry about the following words was forgotten, and they have remained not carrying out the katakana notation. Since I want to change this point to this opportunity, please teach the pronunciation of the following words. Thank you.Penpen0216 23:41, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turiec
Veľká Fatra
Blatnická
Gaderská

Hi there! I noticed your plea for help on the Faroese wikipedia for improving the Mošovce article, so I edited it a little, making the Faroese a bit better. Unfortunately, I don't know anything about Mošovce, so I couldn't help you with more than the Faroese bit. Cheers, CatBoris 18:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slovak Wikipedians' notice board

Hi. You might be interested in checking out the brand new Wikipedia:Slovak Wikipedians' notice board. All Wikipedians interested in Slovakia or subjects somehow related to Slovakia are invited to use this noticeboard as a tool for better organizing their activities, making announcements to others with similar interests, and discussing any actual issues related to their work on Wikipedia. You are welcome to add this notice board to your watchlist, so that you could see when it is updated and thus take part in any projects, initiatives, and improvements relating to articles about Slovakia. Also, you are welcome to report your own articles here so they could be peer-reviewed and expanded by other contributors. Tankred 15:57, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We would like to invite you to join WikiProject Slovakia, an attempt to build and maintain a large and neutral database of Slovakia-related articles on Wikipedia. To join, simply add your name to the members section of WikiProject Slovakia.

≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 08:57, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Ovecka.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Ovecka.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:07, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unified Account

I hereby certify that I am asking for my Commons account Peterret to be moved to PeterRet for the reason of creating the Global Unified Account. PeterRet (talk) 21:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Turiec Basin

Hi there!

O.K. Later. Because I am very busy at the moment. But my command of English not so good as yours. Nmate (talk) 13:13, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Révay family

Greetings!

I saw your editing on the Révay clan article. That was pure Hungarian nobility. First just see the name, what is old and typical Hungarian noble name. That time Slovakia was North part of the Hungarian Kingdom. Révay has nothing to do with Slovaks. If he can lives now, than he can be ethnic Hungarian!

Greetings. MagyarTürk

Thanks for your answer. But that time Syrima was part of the Hungarian Kingdom, I meant it. MagyarTürk —Preceding undated comment was added at 16:39, 26 September 2008 (UTC).[reply]

AIESEC

Hello, I noticed by your userbox that you are an AIESECer. As a wikipedian I would like to encourage you to edit AIESEC as this page needs much improvement. Thanks for the help. --vierstein^talk|Contrib 01:14, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Territories lost by Hungary under the Treaty of Trianon

A tag has been placed on Template:Territories lost by Hungary under the Treaty of Trianon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an unambiguous misrepresentation of established policy.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Si Trew (talk) 17:52, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Territories lost by Hungary under the Treaty of Trianon

A tag has been placed on Template:Territories lost by Hungary under the Treaty of Trianon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. Si Trew (talk) 17:54, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, PeterRet. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Manor House in Mošovce into Mošovce Park. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 22:14, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Diannaa. Makes perfect sense, the thing is that I'm the original contributor/author of the text in both articles. I hope that makes text reorganization like this possible even without explicit tagging :) Many thanks. PeterRet (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ladislav Hagara moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Ladislav Hagara. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. AntiDionysius (talk) 03:09, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ladislav Hagara (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lopifalko was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

E.g. "leading ... earning him a place among the most import ... one of the leading..."

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ladislav Hagara and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lopifalko (talk) 11:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PeterRet! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lopifalko (talk) 11:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ladislav Hagara has been accepted

Ladislav Hagara, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lopifalko (talk) 15:12, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]