User talk:Peteturtle

Welcome!

Hello, Peteturtle, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Luksuh 23:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Smallest Wikipedia Article

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Smallest Wikipedia Article, by Fightindaman (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Smallest Wikipedia Article is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Smallest Wikipedia Article, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 17:57, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ubuntu pronunciation

Hi, I saw that you removed the common North American pronunciation of Ubuntu from its article. I understand that this pronunciation is "incorrect" insofar as it differs from the standard South African pronunciation of the word, however I don't think this is particularly important. The point of the encyclopedia article, I think, is descriptive rather than prescriptive. The article should describe the name of the distribution as it is actually used and encountered. Similarly, the article on PostgreSQL describes several common names and pronunciation. I'd like to add back the common American pronunciation of Ubuntu with a note that it is technically incorrect. What do you think? MOXFYRE (contrib) 21:37, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ubuntu Criticism

I don't agree with the way that some of the editors have been treating you in regards to the Ubuntu criticism section you added. I've pasted it onto the talk page and tried to start a more productive discussion there. Lets try to get it in shape and then add it back to the article. —mako ๛ 12:01, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad you appreciate the support. Keep in mind, I've got my own biases -- I am a core developer and part of the founding team of Ubuntu. I'm more upset at the way that your criticism section has been removed than I am supportive of its contents -- although I think every article should be structured to show multiple points of view. The point of a criticism section should be to highlight notable criticism and should not exist just because. I think we should include one with relevant information but I don't feel the same urgency that you do.

Let's work together to build a strong summary of notable critics that everyone can agree with. We can do that on the talk page and then move it into the article when that's done. —mako ๛

Because

Wikipedia is not about truth. It is about truth through verifiability. If you cannot find sources to back up your claims, it has NO place on wikipedia. This is also besides the fact that when you added that section, you also accidentally deleted about half of the article. DurinsBane87 13:45, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok, it happens. Sorry i was a little harsh, it's just hard to tell honest mistakes from vandalism sometimes. DurinsBane87 00:38, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

Yes, actually.

Because they are the same product with different software. It is still in essence the exact same OS, just with different features and desktop environment.

regards, H a m m o —Preceding unsigned comment added by H a m m o (talk • contribs) 11:57, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ubuntu

Leave the Ubuntu disambiguation page alone. Switching it with Ubuntu (Linux Distribution) will simply result in an edit war that you will lose.jonathon 06:48, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fedora 7 Bluecurve image

Hi, I was just wondering why you have removed the Bluecurve theme image from the Fedora 7 section on Fedora (Linux distribution). Considering it is the standard theme for Fedora, I would have thought it should be kept in favour of the other Fedora 7 image. JGXenite 15:53, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it. Just thought I'd ask rather than revert it and cause problems :). [Jam]^[talk] 21:37, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fedora (disambiguation)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that recently copied the contents of a page and pasted it into another with a different name. Specifically, you copied the contents of Fedora and pasted it into Fedora (disambiguation). This is what we call a "cut and paste move," and it is very undesirable because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. The mechanism we use for renaming articles is to move it to a new name which both preserves the page's history and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves to request the move by another. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. --Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 05:23, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duel

Your pointing out of the vandalism is appreciated; in the future, however, please do not add this information to the article itself; This just results in more information in the article that will have to be deleted; Bringing it up on the talk page will get editors' attention just as easily (alternatively, you could contact one of use who regularly edit the article or talk on the talk page directly and ask for help).

For future reference, if you goto the history of the article, and click on the date and time of the edit, you will see the old edit of the page. Clicking "edit this page" at the top of that page should bring you to an edit of the old version (with a warning at the top). Submitting that page will result in reverting the vandalism. Cheers. TheHYPO (talk) 13:46, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Google TechTalks

I have nominated Google TechTalks, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google TechTalks. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ScienceApologist (talk) 15:06, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ubuntu Home Server logo.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ubuntu Home Server logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 01:38, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Microsoft Excel Viewer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Microsoft Excel Viewer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microsoft Excel Viewer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. mabdul 11:51, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of AtGoogleTalks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AtGoogleTalks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AtGoogleTalks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DBZFan30 (talk) 11:06, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of C Primer Plus

The article C Primer Plus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable book. fails WP:NBOOK, WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 09:30, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]