User talk:PiPhiTau

Welcome!

Hello, PiPhiTau, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Padayappa. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kailash29792 (talk) 03:29, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Text-source integrity

Hi PiPhiTau,

Thanks for your contributions, but please try to respect text-source integriy. In particular, please don't place new content in between existing content and the reference that supports that content. Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 07:54, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On re-examination, I see the ref you added was the same as the existing ref, so you didn't break text-source integrity. I removed your citation as it didn't need to be there twice. Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 11:11, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vov Dylan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Vov Dylan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 13:23, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Sibling, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Nat Gertler (talk) 21:13, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Americanophile for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Americanophile is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Americanophile until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GirthSummit _(blether) 09:55, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Americanophile moved to draftspace

As agreed at the AfD discussion, I've converted the article into a draft - you can work on it there, add reliable sources discussing the concept (rather than the word), and publish it as an article when it's ready. Cheers

Your draft article, Draft:Americanophile

Hello, PiPhiTau. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Americanophile".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:58, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]