User talk:PilotBartram

Warning

Read wp:npa and wp:or, a source has to actually say it, using words, if they do not say X has happened they have not said X has happened even if they say Y has happened (they may be both letters of the alphabet, they are not the same letter). Slatersteven (talk) 16:00, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your wrong

If you are looking for them to say a Tactical nuclear bomb has been detonated when. We all know they have. Then you be waiting for a long time.

It is ok I am going to be making phone calls your incompetent. PilotBartram (talk) 16:03, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And read WP:NOTDUMB. And no I am not wrong per wp:v a source has to actually say something for us to say it. And read wp:policy, content (and indeed you) have to obey those. Slatersteven (talk) 16:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong,

Politicians never ever say what they really mean.

The News organizations are paraphrasing,

They being careful of what they are saying.

The source I provided is saying everything - I am telling you.

You are not capable of reading between the lines.

You are wrong.

Everyone says Wiki is not a RS as you put it.

You said YouTube is not a RS

who is reliable around here.

I guess no one.

because I am telling you what happened

what is happening

what they are saying

but because there isn't a sign infront of your face saying WW3 you can't see it

but IF YOU EXPAND THE KOREAN WAR page to say the CONFLICT HAS EXPANDED

YOU CAN PROTECT THE PEOPLE WHO WENT TO HELP UKRAINE FIGHT BY MAKING SURE

WHEN NORTH KOREA TAKES PRISONERS THEY CAN'T TAKE THEM BACK TO KOREA

AND HOLD THEM PRISONER IN A FORGOTTEN WAR

You need forthought.

I really do understand your situation.

but it is ok like I said

I pulled up the corperate number of Wikipedia

you have your policies.

I will get this fixed

have a good day PilotBartram (talk) 16:10, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, if you wish to report me wp:ani is the correct place, I would advise very strongly against it. Slatersteven (talk) 16:07, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No i don't wish to report you, I want to work with you.

but I wont even mention your name I am not that kind of person. I wanted to tell you personally

instead of doing an N-run around you. I at least want to tell you to your face PilotBartram (talk) 16:11, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is my last response to you (here) read our policies, if people do not say it we can't say they have. We have policies, you have to obey them, it is not optional. Slatersteven (talk) 16:14, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked for one week from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Your disruptive editing includes personal attacks and harassment and original research and POV pushing against policy. These behaviors are not permitted on Wikipedia. Cullen328 (talk) 17:52, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just go ahead and delete this account. PilotBartram (talk) 17:56, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts cannot be deleted. However, you are free to simply stop editing Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 18:04, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vanish that bitch! 59.84.62.81 (talk) 22:19, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]