User talk:PiotrParadzinski
Welcome PiotrParadzinski!
I'm Paine Ellsworth, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}}
here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes
~~~~
at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
{{My sandbox}}
on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.Nomination of THINK (mnemonic) for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article THINK (mnemonic) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/THINK (mnemonic) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 19:51, 22 March 2020 (UTC)
Think principle
[edit]Hello Piotr, I disagree with our colleague's assesment that the THINK article was only created to be an advert for the consulting firm. However, although I've seen this principle on posters multiple times, I couldn't find any coverage about the slogan itself, so it's difficult to demonstrate that it is notable. Feel free to write on my talk page if you need assistance with editing. – Thjarkur (talk) 21:05, 22 March 2020 (UTC)