User talk:Plummer

Welcome!

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Wild Wild West, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Horton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:05, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mutual Burlesque Association has been accepted

Mutual Burlesque Association, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 23:09, 27 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hinda Wausau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chicago World's Fair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:37, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. On I Married You for Fun. — Diannaa (talk) 15:59, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the It's a Wonderful Life plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 19:16, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making changes to plot summaries/synopses that conflict with the plot summary edit guides, as you did at It's a Wonderful Life. You may wish to review the specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. Excessive detail and high word counts should be avoided. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 00:50, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Wild Wild West, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rawhide.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bobby Barber, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Modern Times.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Eltinge Burlesque.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Eltinge Burlesque.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:30, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Apollo1934.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Apollo1934.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:31, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Munsters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al Lewis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Particularly, any analysis, including scientific accuraccy of a work of fiction, should be attributed to a reliable secondary source. DonQuixote (talk) 15:59, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added a reliable source.~~ Plummer (talk) 16:19, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gadgets in The Wild Wild West for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gadgets in The Wild Wild West is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gadgets in The Wild Wild West until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 23:23, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://wildwildwest.fandom.com/wiki/The_Wild_Wild_West_Wiki exist. You can put your content there. Dream Focus 12:55, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I did that and the link to that page was deleted from Wikipedia for lack of sources. I have no vested interest in the page -- in fact it was bloated and dominating the Wild Wild West page, but it was not flagged when it lived on the WWW page. Wondering why now?Plummer (talk) 02:25, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (second request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Wild Wild West into Gadgets in The Wild Wild West. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My adding plot for "The Taking of Pelham One Two Three (1974)

Are you serious? Really? I can't add any edits to the plot for the movie? What did you do that for? Huh? Christopher K. Howell (talk) 03:42, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The movie obviously takes place in New York and involves the NYPD and the Lexington Avenue line. Plummer (talk) Plummer (talk) 13:32, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Plot bloat" at It's a Wonderful Life

Hi, I'm disappointed that you undid my edit. Sam Wainwright wasn't mentioned in the plot section otherwise and you removed the only sentence about him. p b p 14:23, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've been a victim of this, too, so please don't take it personally. According to Wikipedia practices, a plot summary should run between 500 and 700 words. Right now it's pushing the limit at 697. I know it's a beloved movie, but Sam Wainwright is just not as critical to the summary as the other characters and events. Plummer (talk) 17:12, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Date of publication - Apollo Minksy

File:HSApolloMinksy.jpg Where was this taken from? Relevant as if it was printed in 1928 or 1927 it would be public domain, 1929 or later it would not be. Recon rabbit 21:16, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The caption says 1928, so it was identified. The source is The Billboard, Vol. 40 Issue 30 July 28, 1928 page 34. Plummer (talk) 17:50, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I wasn't sure if the caption was added afterwards. I'll update the description of the image. Recon rabbit 19:00, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

June 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 07:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]