User talk:Plusgray

Image tagging for Image:Everybody Hates Chris - The Cast.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Everybody Hates Chris - The Cast.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:07, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie Winslow

HI, could you please review WP:BIO and add information to the article that asserts the subject's notability?04:54, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Family Matters - Eddie Winslow (Darius McCrary) (1993).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Family Matters - Eddie Winslow (Darius McCrary) (1993).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:51, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Family Matters - The Winslows.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Family Matters - The Winslows.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 02:49, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:FamilyMatters - The Cast (1992-1993).jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:FamilyMatters - The Cast (1992-1993).jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 02:50, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:New Edition - Candy Girl (1983).jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:New Edition - Candy Girl (1983).jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 02:59, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sandra Clark

A tag has been placed on Sandra Clark, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Realkyhick 05:06, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Roger "Raj" Thomas

Roger "Raj" Thomas, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Roger "Raj" Thomas satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roger "Raj" Thomas and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Roger "Raj" Thomas during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Ksero (leave me a message, things I've done) 11:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Judy Winslow

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Judy Winslow, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unnotable insignificant fictional character

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ejfetters (talk) 21:00, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jerry Jamal Jameson

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jerry Jamal Jameson, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

unnotable insignificant fictional character

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ejfetters (talk) 21:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Judy Winslow

I have nominated Judy Winslow, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waldo Faldo. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ejfetters (talk) 10:18, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jerry Jamal Jameson

I have nominated Jerry Jamal Jameson, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waldo Faldo. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ejfetters (talk) 10:18, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Plusgray! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 436 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Candy Ford - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Mitch Silpa - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Donald G. Reed - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Danielle Hoover - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Danielle Hoover for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danielle Hoover is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danielle Hoover until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 18:03, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]