User talk:PoetryFan

PoetryFan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi PoetryFan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

August 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Alicb. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Do not post fake block notices or blank other users' talk pages. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 18:43, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating articles for deletion

You have nominated two articles for deletion, creating Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religion Communicators Council and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wilbur Awards. However, you did not complete the nomination process outlined here - you did not do step three, which is crucial. The reason nobody has commented on the deletion discussions is that the discussions were never posted to the Articles for Deletion logs. Please list the discussion pages there now, and do not attempt to close the discussions or blank the articles yourself. While non-admin closures of AfD discussions can sometimes be appropriate, the person who nominates an article for deletion shouldn't close the discussion. Thanks, --bonadea contributions talk 18:49, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Phil wink (talk) 16:04, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another notice

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Your pattern continues. Phil wink (talk) 01:57, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Some aspects of your disruptive editing may at first have been due to not understanding how Wikipedia works. However, it is very difficult to see how your changing Alicb's comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religion Communicators Council to make it appear to say the exact opposite of what he or she actually said can have been anything but a deliberate attempt to deceive. Combining that with your history of disruptive editing, and specifically your persistent stalking and harassment of Alicb, you have been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. I suggest that in your reason, among other things, you explain the edit in which you falsified Alicb's comment in that discussion. You should also read the guide to appealing blocks first. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:19, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]