User talk:Progrock70s

Block appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Progrock70s (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise to don't have a harsh behavior with other users, and to stop edit warring and non-consecutive edits. I try to have more good contributions and won't evade blocks anymore.Progrock70s (talk) 04:26, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address your block evasion, nor does it tell us what edits you intend to make going forward. If you still only intend to make some edits to your sandbox and then stop, we might as well just leave you blocked- so you'll need to tell us what more you wish to do. 331dot (talk) 10:13, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Progrock70s (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise to don't have a harsh behavior with other users, and to stop edit warring and non-consecutive edits. I try to do more good contributions and won't evade blocks anymore Progrock70s (talk) 17:15, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not fully address the concerns raised by 331dot in your last unblock request. Yamla (talk) 18:12, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Progrock70s (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I plan to stay away from edit warring and making non-consecutive edits on Thin Lizzy album pages and instead I try to cite reliable sources on those articles. I plan to have a good behavior with editors and extended confirmed users and admins. I plan to don't evade blocks again and at last I plan to make few articles on sandbox based on various rock bands including Black Sabbath, Queen (band), etc. Progrock70s (talk) 19:27, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You can take the standard offer, which requires you to go 6 months without sock puppetry or block evasion. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:40, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are welcome to retire, but you are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. I have replaced them. Do not remove (or edit) them again. --Yamla (talk) 20:52, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retired notice

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Progrock70s (talk) 19:04, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Black Boys on the Corner (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This could be notable, but the sources consist of two books, with the third source providing no meaningful coverage. Needs at least one more independent and reliable source. Also, there is too much unreferenced content – eg. the entire 'Recording' section hasn't a single cite.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Black Boys on the Corner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:03, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Progrock70s! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:03, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Black Boys on the Corner

Hello, Progrock70s. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Black Boys on the Corner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Black Boys on the Corner

Hello, Progrock70s. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Black Boys on the Corner".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:33, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]