User talk:Promethean/Archives2008/November
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Promethean. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thanks, dude. That was a toughie. Softlavender (talk) 06:49, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Question
How do you put all these comments which are visible only when someone tries to edit a page? [1] That attention note, yeah how did you do that? - Unpopular Opinion (talk) 06:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- My reply here
- Ah, thanks a lot. - Unpopular Opinion (talk) 12:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Hey
What did you mean my admins notified on my talk page? I mean, no one ever knew that it existed? Or am I in trouble? o_O G ! B B i 3I4m 733t0rz 13:50, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oh okay. I thought it was obvious. I found that after reading it on encyclopedia dramatica. And although that image is black listed, Grawp And hagger go around template vandalising with that. Thanks! G ! B B i 3I4m 733t0rz 23:20, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
G'day Wikimedian :-)
Whilst it's quite likely you'll have heard this news on the grapevine, in your email inbox, or even in person - I thought that it was sufficiently exciting to warrant giving each of you a 'new messages' orange bar! This particular orange bar has been brought to you to let you know that Wikimedia Australia is now open for members!
I'm not on the committee or anything, and that's where the credit is due in getting everything to this point, but I think it would be absolutely fantastic for folks who wish to support the australian wiki community, to go ahead and sign up - we're quite likely to be the world's fatest growing chapter at the moment! Join Us :-)
Here's a little more about membership, and the mailing list in particular is well worth signing up to as well, and is a good forum to get answers to any questions answered, or to share any ideas. I've dropped these notes in under my own steam, and you've received one because you're on this list - feel free to ask me any questions, or anything - I can certainly point you in the right direction :-) cheers all, Privatemusings (talk) 04:04, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Hi, thanks a lot nag97 (talk) 16:46, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Kyle Justin
Hello Promethean, I am contacting you because I am in need of help. I'm fairly new to Wikipedia. You have helped me before so I am asking you. I noticed reverted edits by user 69.239.112.1 to the Kyle Justin article. This user has edited the article several times, performing destructive edits. I believe these edits are covered under the vandalism policy as they are repeated and unnecessary. She has edited the article more than a few times, deleting necessary information, claiming it as redundant, when it is not. The information she has deleted is either not referenced elsewhere in the article or is necessary to repeat in order to properly lay out a time-line of events. I created this article for a musician I am fond of and myself and several others have contributed edits and citations. I believe we have cited the article well. I am looking for help to prevent further vandalism by this article, as she has performed these same edits about 5 times. The user 69.239.112.1 is actually a woman named Jessicka of the band Scarling (both have Wiki articles) who is a former bandmate in Scarling of Kyle Justin's. I know this because it is the same IP that she uses on an old band's message board that I moderated on. She also only edits her own pages if you see her contributions. I believe she has also has attempted to vandalize other articles. I believe she is removing information out of spite and for her own motives, not to make Wikipedia or the article better. I am seeking help in preventing further vandalism. I sought help from another user named writingmodification but I don't believe they are an administrator. Any help, advice, or recommendations are greatly appreciated. Thanks ahead of time. I am perturbed and perplexed. -Matt, M. W. Eilers 03:33, 27 November 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Godblessyrblackheart (talk • contribs)
- The first thing im going to say is although detail is good, Having a huge paragraph is more likely to put people off from reading it. I see that it has already been replied to here so wont reply as Gnfnrf's reply sums it up. «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l» (talk) 10:02, 29 November 2008 (UTC)