User talk:Prosopee

Let me a message, in french or in english (please, don't use popular or idiomatic english!)

My apologies, I did not intend to insult your article about Jung, and I have very little knowledge of French. However, it seemed to me that the article said that Fowler McCormick went to Africa with Jung. Did I read it incorrectly? Because, although he may have initially planned to go, Fowler McCormick did not go on the expedition. I'm sure Bair did not say that he actually went. I assure you that the only reason I made the comment at all was to answer the question of whether the English article was a translation from the French.Rose bartram (talk) 18:27, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rose, no matter about what you said, indeed (i checked it on Bair's biography) McCormick never gone with Jung in Africa, i have to correct this point. I didn't want to be rude, be sure, but my english is not very advanced, so as i experience difficulties to express my sefl :) Thanks a lot, as regards, --Prosopee (talk) 23:02, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jung Addition

Could you tell me the importance of that? There was a mispelling so I reverted it for now. Jok2000 (talk) 16:19, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jung

Hello, i think the Jung's article must collect all the writers or thinkers influenced by Jung... that's the importance i gave to my edit. I am the main contributor on french Wp about Jung's article and i show all the fellows influenced by him i think it is a important data about his reception. Otherwise, why do you keep on line a such paragraph? (sorry for my english) In fact, i pla to contribute on this article but i am a new wikipedian, thus it is a way for me to get used to contribuate in english.--Prosopee (talk) 16:23, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I thought you were starting to list everyone who might have had a session, which probably is not a good a idea. For example Wolfgang Pauli had extensive (interesting) correspondence. I got the impression the person you listed spokje only briefly to Jung, but I don't have the original source. Jok2000 (talk) 17:25, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

indeed it is a small source, actually what kind of edit you need on Jung? i can try to translate some parts of french article (i made) to this one about non extended topics..? kindly --Prosopee (talk) 20:14, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm bad at French, but a quick read through the French version suggests to me that it covers WWII much better than the English version. Maybe you would like to grab a bit of that and put it in the English one? I was especially intrigued about the secret agent aspect. I had not heard of that before. Jok2000 (talk) 20:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i would be very glad to be in charge of it! i wrote the 80% of the french article and it will be soon on vote for being "good article"... I principally found the source on Deirdre Bairs'Jung which is the best-well documented biography. i am afraid that my translations will be very bad due to my rude english, but i will try anyway. This is a good link for this period (and in english) : Psychotherapy in the Third Reich by Geoffrey Cocks. soon, --Prosopee (talk) 21:18, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

French article translation

Can you help me translate fr:Prince Punuari'i Teri'itapunui Pomare and fr:Prince Teri'itua Tuavira Joinville Pomare?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 08:18, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

right, i will. soon Prosopee (talk) 06:27, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You could go ahead and do it too if you want and there are many others in fr:Catégorie:Souverain tahitien and fr:Catégorie:Souverain polynésien that would do well for translation. :/--KAVEBEAR (talk) 23:57, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK i will. A quite busy right now ;) Prosopee (talk) 09:07, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]