User talk:Pruddle

License tagging for Image:SanfordStadium.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SanfordStadium.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:08, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:DSC003391.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:DSC003391.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 21:57, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

UGA Chapel Bell

Hey, I saw your comment on the UGA Talk Page. The Chapel Bell has not been stolen by Georgia Tech, but another bell on campus has been; I will find out for sure which one within the next few days.Pruddle 06:43, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking into that. The sentence in Clean, Old-Fashioned Hate I'm investigating is the following:

The UGA Chapel Bell and the Georgia Tech [[Rambling Wreck|Ramblin' Wreck]] have been rumored to have been stolen numerous times by their respective rival before, after, or even during major sporting events between the two schools.<ref name="wreck">{{cite web|url=http://cyberbuzz.gatech.edu/reck/wreck.html|title=The Ramblin' Reck Club: History of the Ramblin' Wreck|accessdate=2007-03-04}}</ref>{{Fact|date=March 2007}}

—Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 06:49, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any news on this? —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 20:47, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey sorry about the delay. According to the UGA Visitor's Center, the Chapel Bell has not been stolen by Georgia Tech, but they may have stolen the bell from Park Hall. Park Hall currently has a bell tower with the bell missing. Pruddle 05:24, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a source somewhere that we can cite about that? Preferably online, but I suppose citing a book would be okay. Also, feel free to update Clean, Old-Fashioned Hate with that info. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 06:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No idea on the source, but I'll check some books that may have that information. Pruddle 22:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Red and Black

I believe you, but is there somewhere on the website that that states that Matthew Grayson is the editor? —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 00:36, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For now it can referenced from http://media.www.redandblack.com/media/storage/paper871/news/2007/05/01/News/Red-Black.Returns-2891749.shtml

The staff list on the website should be up sometime next week, once the summer staff is finalizedPruddle 00:51, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay :) I take it that you are involved in The Red and Black in some manner? —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 00:52, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I just started there actually. I'm going to be the Online Editor and on the Editorial Board for the Summer. I may continue on as Online Editor for the Fall, depending on how things go this summer. Pruddle 01:44, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like fun. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 07:24, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 27 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Amaranthus tuberculatus, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Maxim_(talk) 14:42, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 22:28, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]