User talk:Psora

Welcome

Hello Psora, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! You (Talk) 19:12, Jun 26, 2005 (UTC)

To change username, contact a bureaucrat

Contact a bureaucrat from the Wikipedia:List of bureaucrats, and they can change your username (keeping all your contribution history). -- Curps 16:11, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Four tildes

Stop demanding that people sign there signature. Your an experienced wikianite, you should know how to look up who made the comment. If someone doesnt want to sign its entirely up to them. Or at least, may i make a suggestion?...If your going to ask, dont be so capriousous when you do, do it or dont (hey, that could be a clothing line slogan - Just do it or dont - hehe >_< hehe). Anyways, just a thought.--Gephart 01:44, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

October 2005 (UTC)--Gephart 01:44, 21 October 2005 (UTC)--Gephart 01:44, 21 October 2005 (UTC)--Gephart 01:44, 21

<snip>several hundred lines of the same</snip>

October 2005 (UTC)--Gephart 01:44, 21 October 2005 (UTC)--Gephart 01:44, 21 October 2005 (UTC)--Gephart 01:44, 21

Follow Up

Ok, the multiple signitures was kind of a joke, but your clearly one of those uptight people who can't understand humor, so i have taken the liberty and removed them. Also, your point is well noted about the signatures, i was just saying that sometimes you add the comment to sign and sometimes you dont on your posts, saying that when you did it was rather capriousous. So, please dont insult me, or worse make yourself look like an eyedot by questioning my syntax. Thank you, and have a wonderful day. --Gephart 04:26, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thanks for you great comments about the Phish page, it at least gives us a place to start. I didnt mean to sound nasty in the last comment on the talk page, but i am just getting annoyed at all this back and forth nonsense (as i image you are).Gephart

Phish Article

Hey, im just getting to the Phish article now. I am starting to read over it, remove POV and things that have no sources or proof. I have two questions for you, how do you revert to a last edit, and how do you know if the current version is the 'live' one? Also, what are sock puppets. Thanks and best regards!--Gephart 01:25, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Article Peptidoglycan

On the article Peptidoglycan, you removed the alternative name, murein. This is indeed an alternative name for peptidoglycan, so please explain your reasons for removing the name? Please note that Murein also redirects to peptidoglycan, so it seems pointless to remove the definition. Mushin ^talk 12:17, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Participant alert regarding Wikiproject on Advertising

The Wikiproject No Ads, created as a backlash against the Answers.com deal, has served an important function in providing a space for users to express their disagreement with the Foundation proposal. While the current controversies about userboxes raise questions about political and social advocacy on Wikipedia, there should be greater flexibility regarding advocacy about Wikipedia in the Wikipedia namespace. Reported and linked by Slashdot and other press sources as a unique and spontaneous occurence in Wikipedia history, it has apparently had some impact as, despite being scheduled to begin in January, not a peep has been heard about the trial and proposed sponsored link since the deal's controversial announcement months ago. Currently, however, there is an attempt to delete the project or move it off Wikipedia altogether. Since the Foundation has provided no additional information and has not attempted to answer the specific questions that participants in the project raised, it is unclear if the Answers.com deal has been abandoned or simply delayed. Until the situation becomes more clear, I believe the group should still have a place in the Wikipedia namespace. Sincerely, Tfine80 00:25, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Gamehendge

I have nominated Gamehendge, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gamehendge. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tenacious D Fan (talk) 13:43, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:SGH-Thelma.jpg

The file File:SGH-Thelma.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, uploaded for test in User sandbox. Insufficient source information to validate license.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr Tex 19:03, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]