User talk:PsychopathicAssassin

August 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Demba Ba has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Demba Ba was changed by PsychopathicAssassin (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867924 on 2014-08-18T13:29:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:29, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PsychopathicAssassin, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi PsychopathicAssassin! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:14, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nonfree images in userspace

Please refer to this discussion, Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive850#User:Vranak_adding_non-free_content_to_his_user_page, if you have any questions. This is a clear-cut matter. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 16:25, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to 2014–15 Arsenal F.C. season, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 15:34, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Your recent editing history at 2014–15 Arsenal F.C. season shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

A number of editors have found issues with your edits, namely neutrality of point of view, peacock terms and excessive details. In such cases of disputes, please discuss and try to reach a consensus with the other editors either at the article talk page or the current discussion at WT:FOOTY. Note that continued edit warring may lead to a block. Thank you. LRD NO (talk) 13:17, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014–15 Arsenal F.C. season

Your recent edits to this article are in direct violation of community consensus at WT:FOOTBALL; you have already been warned about your editing, and if you continue to edit disruptively then you will be blocked from editing. Please consider this a final warning. Giant Snowman 19:15, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh, please also don't use IP addresses to try and get around this - we are not stupid. Giant Snowman 10:49, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Mesut Özil, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. QED237 (talk) 23:42, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Mesut Özil, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. QED237 (talk) 18:33, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WWE Raw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tonight Is the Night. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Machine Gun Kelly (rapper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diddy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Two Steps from Hell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Top Gear. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited TNA Hall of Fame, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bound for Glory. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Machine Gun Kelly (rapper), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suits

Hi PA, you have now made the same edit three times on Suits (series) without really explaining why (the first time you said it was to avoid spoilers, and the last time to "add extra info" but you have in fact removed info). You have not given reasons or references for your changes - for example, why have you removed Adams and Macht from the list of producers when they are both credited as such, or where is a source saying the series is a "thriller"? You've also removed some details of plot arcs for a couple of seasons without giving reasons, and changed headings like "overview" to "episodes" when what follows is not an episode list. Please discuss your proposed changes on the article talk page (see WP:BRD) rather than just reverting. Thanks Melcous (talk) 13:19, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Thanks for your message on my talk page, but I'm a little concerned about your comment about "enforcing" your edits and instructing me not to revert any of your edits. That is simply not how wikipedia works - you do not own the article, and we improve it by consensus. By simply reverting all my editing without even trying to understand them, you have reinstated even spelling and grammar errors. I also notice that you have not yet engaged on the talk page for the article. I have started a new discussion about the structure of the article there, so it would be good to get some consensus responding to what I see are the problems with the article. I would also ask you to please be more careful in your reverting and take the time to understand why edits are being made rather than simply making wholesale reverts. I also note you have added a tag calling the article a "good article" and instructing other editors not to change it in any way, but as far as I can see this article has not actually been nominated for GA status, and it is not your place to tell other editors they cannot make changes. I do not wish to engage in an edit war, so would appreciate you joining discussion the on talk page. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 23:47, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, looking through the edits in a bit more detail, I can see that the "good article" tag was not added you but by another editor (and it is that editor's only contribution to wikipedia). I will therefore remove it. Melcous (talk) 05:04, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you could contribute to the discussion on the talk page for the article that would be good, because while you keep saying your edits are "correct" you have not explained why. The current structure of the article is not correct according to the Manual of Style - see WP:MOSTV - and the article should be reverted to the structure outlined there. Thanks Melcous (talk) 03:06, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Fyddlestix (talk) 13:27, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Diff for reference. This kind of personal attack is wholly unacceptable. I see you've been editing wikipedia for almost a year - you should know better. Fyddlestix (talk) 13:30, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Noq. I noticed that you made a change to an article, MGK, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please STOP your disruptive change to the name - as has been explained repeatedly - you need to provide a more WP:reliable source than the police record for your version of his name. Facebook is not a reliable source. noq (talk) 17:22, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, PsychopathicAssassin. You have new messages at Noq's talk page.
Message added 17:45, 17 June 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

noq (talk) 17:45, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, PsychopathicAssassin. You have new messages at Noq's talk page.
Message added 17:57, 17 June 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

noq (talk) 17:57, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on MGK. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Please stop reverting your non sourced change to his name. discuss it on the articles talk page to gain consensus instead of trying to force your own view. You should read WP:BRD and follow that rather than continually going against established consensus. noq (talk) 17:59, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the reliable sources, including newspaper article and police booking report on the article talk page. Besides promotional materials, do you have any third-party (not published by MGK) sources indicating that "Richard" is not part of his legal name? Spencer^T♦C 13:53, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shaker Heights High School and WP:ALUMNI

Thanks for your edits on the alumni list at Shaker Heights High School. Please note that according to the guidance at Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines#Alumni, all alumni who meet Wikipedia's notability criteria "are to be included on an alumni list, regardless of how much time they have spent on a school roll, from one day to several years, and whether or not they graduated." Thanks, --Arxiloxos (talk) 18:16, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, PsychopathicAssassin. You have new messages at Talk:MGK.
Message added 14:39, 29 June 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

noq (talk) 14:39, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edits at MGK

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. This warning is specifically in regard to this change [1] which you have made repeatedly despite numerous objections and reversions. Please discuss it on the talk page or take it to WP:DRN etc. Thank you.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 16:50, 8 July 2015 (UTC)-- — Keithbob • Talk • 16:57, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are being issued a final warning regarding edits made at MGK. A policy-based consensus has been formulated on the talk page of the article that determines "Richard" should be included in the article. If you remove it without formulating a new consensus on the article talk page, you will be blocked for disruption and edit warring. Mkdw ^talk 01:39, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at MGK. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Mkdw ^talk 17:55, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Edits like this [2] are generally a sure-fire way to get blocked indefinitely. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:54, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@AndyTheGrump: can't be vandalism or a block edit if its a true statement, can it?

Thanks for the rewording of what i type and not taking it off. Someone decided to take off what i wrote and said that it was irrelevant when WWE, Eonline, and TMZ all promoted them being there. Also Brittany Snow Of Pitch Perfect Was There. She Was Backstage with Lana and Pitch Perfect I think she may have gone to the bathroom or she was sitting down or something when that picture was taken but she was there too. Lana tweeted the picture MTV,WWE, Perez Hilton Eonline etc all has that on their website http://www.mtv.com/news/1901662/anna-kendrick-wwe-summerslam/ http://perezhilton.com/fitperez/2014-08-18-anna-kendrick-and-friends-with-pitch-perfect-costar-wwe-lana-the-ravishing-russian Cmpunkreigns (talk) 16:59, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WrestleMania 31, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kane. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Machine Gun Kelly (rapper). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
STOP changing the name. This has already been discussed on the talk page and a consensus has been reached to leave Richard in. If you continue to edit against consensus you may be blocked from editing. noq (talk) 14:21, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited WrestleMania 32, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The New Day. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tapout (clothing brand), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thiago Alves. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bobby Tarantino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page YG. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drake (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Viral. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Per Help:Minor edit, please do not mark edits that introduce or remove content as minor. Only edits such as typographical corrections, reversion of obvious vandalism and minor formatting changes should be labeled minor. Thanks. DrKay (talk) 16:06, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your last edit in Drake

Your changes have a number of mistakes; drakeversuseverybody.com is not a WP:reliable source, the other source doesn't mention IYRTITL, you mention record brokens but not provide a source, don't understand RIAA includes streaming + sales, used a unlicensed image and WP:SYN by saying "the articles showcase how drake's ruled hip hop in today's age, and how it makes him great." Please, use this talk page to discuss. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:14, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The pictures you added to the article have been reported as copyvio, as you uploaded them as personal work, and those are from the media. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:35, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI

Hey, I just wanted to let you know that you have been targeted at a recent WP:ANI thread concerning some of your work on Wikipedia. If you want to participate in that discussion I have provided a link to it below. Thanks for all of your time and support for Wikipedia! Alicb (talk) 19:29, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited J. Cole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miguel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited J. Cole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Away from Home Tour

added links pointing to Forever (song) and Best I Ever Had

J. Cole

added a link pointing to Drake

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Thank Me Later.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 19:37, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Thank Me Later. Dan56 (talk) 20:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PsychopathicAssassin. You have new messages at Talk:Thank Me Later.
Message added 20:09, 23 August 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jodeci, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Past, The Present, The Future. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Hi. When you do edits like this, please note that we already have a reference called "Xhaka fee" defined some place else, so you should not add a second source with ther same reference name, as it causes a major collision. I have therefore remove the Holding and Xhaka source you added. Qed237 (talk) 15:15, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Your recent editing history at OVO Sound shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:47, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Drake (musician). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. –Davey2010^Talk 17:06, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You were Bold, You was Reverted, Now you need to Discuss it, If I see you revert again I will drag you to WP:AN3 myslf, You've been told directly above this about BRD and yet have apparently ignored it, Edit warring can and will see you blocked so I would strongly advise you discuss your additions,

Thank you, –Davey2010^Talk 17:10, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Davey2010^Talk You were reverted*.

Use of edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:30, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Backlash (2016), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Ascension. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, PsychopathicAssassin. You have new messages at Mattlore's talk page.
Message added 20:00, 5 October 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Mattlore (talk) 20:00, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Drake

Seriously the "Widespread commercial success" and "Rave reviews" need to stop in that article. It is so close to WP:PEACOCK that it seems a fan wrote the whole article. Please, also stick to source. Don't write a whole sentence accompanied by a source that doesn't say that. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 18:48, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Cornerstonepicker, please refrain from adding additional info on the Drake article. You clearly seem to dislike the subject in question, so you're doing nothing but hurting the article.

@PsychopathicAssassin: No, this happens with every article in WP. You're just inflating the article with wrong data. You're ignoring again WP guidelines. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 19:29, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PsychopathicAssassin. I've taken a look at your edits, and they do appear to be non-neutral. In particular, your edits include a lot of emphasis on commercial success even in sentences where its entirely unrelated, and you often claim that commercial success led to something happening when the sources don't say that directly. In order to make sure Wikipedia is as reliable as possible, we don't allow such non-neutral language in our articles. Please do not revert back to the version of the article you created, but do feel free to discuss this on the article's talk page and attempt to come to a compromise on your proposed changes. The Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle is a good method to prevent edit warring on articles, which is likely to lead to a block if it continues. Thanks and happy editing. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 08:01, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BU Rob13, well, that only appears to occur in the opening of the article. Cornerstonepicker has no precedent to alter the remainder of the article, often removing whole sections. Please see that this is followed through.

@PsychopathicAssassin: You're misinformed in the topic of what's the difference between "digital sales" and "platinum certifications". A single being certified 3x platinum doesn't mean it has sold 3 million copies. Since May 2013 RIAA certifications for digital singles include on-demand audio and/or video song streams in addition to downloads.^[1]

^ "RIAA Adds Digital Streams To Historic Gold & Platinum Awards". Recording Industry Association of America. May 9, 2013. Archived from the original on October 19, 2014. Retrieved May 9, 2013. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

@PsychopathicAssassin: lol, if you check RIAA certification listings, it clearly states a single/album is certified platinum by shifting 3 million units. These can either be physical copies, digital downloads, and streaming. RIAA also state that 1500 streams = 1 album sold. Please stop changing my edits.

https://slashdot.org/story/16/02/15/1645204/the-riaa-says-1500-streams--1-album-sale

@PsychopathicAssassin: You clearly don't understand Wikipedia. Your edits aren't untouchable facts, actually is a consensus. And stop ignoring the facts: Combined sales, video streaming and on-demand streaming result in a certification. For example "Hotline Bling" has sold 2 million copies (digital)^[1], but with streaming is 5x platinum. You can't just misinform readers saying "it has sold 5 million copies". That isn't accurate. What you said is how RIAA makes a formula for equivalent units. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 20:21, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

^ Mansell, Henry (February 20, 2016). "Hip Hop Single Sales: Rihanna, G-Eazy & Future". HipHopDX. Retrieved February 21, 2016.

@Cornerstonepicker: And how do you think they got that 5x platinum number? They just pulled it out of thin air? As you have just described, the streaming, individual units, and on demand streaming ALL COUNT toward a SALE. Saying it sold 5 million copies is absolutely correct, as the RIAA only certify it due to the amount it sold, in album equivalent units. ALBUM EQUIVALENT UNITS means the SAME AS A PHYSICAL COPY OF THE ALBUM. That's how you get the "5 million copies".

Pure sales (aka traditional sales) exclude streams, so Cornerstonepicker actually is right. When talking about sales, Wikipedia and other publications are referring to this unless they specifically indicate that the figure is based on equivalent units, which is what streams are. Maybe this explanation of the example given above will help:

A song is downloaded 2 million times equates to 2 million digital copies sold.
A song that is streamed 300 million times equates to 3 million streaming equivalent units. None of those streams involved downloading/purchasing the track.
Combining 2 million downloads with 3 million streaming equivalent units totals up to 5 million equivalent units.

It therefore is possible to sell 2 million and receive a 5x Platinum certification because RIAA counts stream equivalent units in is certifications when they count 1 million UNITS (whether sales, equivalent units, or a combination of the two) for a platinum certification. Before May 2013, streams weren't counted towards the certifications, so certifications before that point indicated a minimum sales figure, but even then it didn't always show the exact count as lots of sales come between levels of certifications. Snuggums (talk / edits) 22:26, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Drake (musician)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, PsychopathicAssassin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Good Article template

Hi, PsychopathicAssassin. Please do not add the {{good article}} template to articles, as you did in this edit. Articles are promoted to Good Article status only after following the Good Article review process. Thanks. --RL0919 (talk) 02:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Timestamp

Hi.

When you update statistics please remember that you should also update the timestamps as of when the stats are correct. This is done by manually updating the date above or below the statistics table. By doing this we show when the stats were last updated and it prevents other editors from accidentally updating the stats again.

Please keep this in mind. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 10:17, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited More Life, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fader. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

Please don't add your own personal interpretation of review aggregators, as you did in 2 Fast 2 Furious. This is original research and is forbidden on Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:02, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You also blanked sourced content in this edit, including the citation itself. Do not do this again, please. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:09, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will you please stop adding your own personal commentary to Wikipedia articles? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:51, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate obvious financial success is obvious. Clarity isn't personal commentary.

Financial success isn't "obvious", it is subjective based on a whole variety of factors i.e. the budget, the ancillary revenue, the profit margins etc and therefore it needs to be qualified. Look at Titanic (1997 film) and it is clear why that film is regarded as a success. Also, there is no causal connection between critical success and commercial success, so using phrasing such as "Despite its commcercial success..." you are WP:EDITORIALIZING. "Despite" is even highlighted as a problem word at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch. Please stop reverting editors and start a discussion on the article talk pages if you disagree with the reasons for the revert. Alternatively you can join the existing discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film#.22financial_success.22. Betty Logan (talk) 11:58, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Turbo Charged Prelude, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Phoenix and Brian O'Connor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

Your recent editing history at The Fast and the Furious (2001 film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Betty Logan (talk) 12:53, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to make a case defending your behvaior please do so at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Betty Logan (talk) 17:06, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Kuru (talk) 17:21, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:40, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You just got off a block for edit warring to maintain your synthesis. Do not start this up again. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:41, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited About Time (mixtape), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Romance and Liberation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To many small changes to New York City FC

Your seventeen recent changes to the New York City FC article, many of which were small are a problem. Changing wording from "is an American professional" to "is an professional" is wrong from a grammatical point of view, and changes like "first player" to "first ever player" are unnecessary as first is the same as first ever. Removing a link to one of the clubs in the hatnote, is questionable. Essentially, the only real change you made was indicating that they bowed out in the conference semi-finals. I reverted because of that. Feel free to modify in smaller groups and try to improve your writing style in the process. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:54, 6 November 2017 (UTC) @Walter Görlitz - LMAOOO, telling an esteemed English professor who graduated with full honors from Stanford is being told how to correct my English. Sure, dude. Okay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PsychopathicAssassin (talk • contribs) 09:34, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. My edits were all inspired by the Wikipedia-deamed "featured" article Arsenal F.C., which clearly displays my edits on New York City FC were substantiated and provided great merit to the article in question.: You can laugh your ass off and whatever the trailing Os are about, but stay away from articles that you're planning on making a mess of such as Hudson River Derby. I'll point you to WP:LANGVAR and remind you that your honours are useless such as Hudson River Derby. While teams in England and Europe pipe the "FC" or "F.C." out of their names, most North American teams do not. It is part of their name. You don't even know how to ping editors correctly. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:26, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Walter Görlitz I will continue, however I wish and deem fit, to provide my great edits to this website, Walter. Also, for further reference, you misspelt "ass" and "planning" in your diatribe against my edits. I've fixed it for you, though. I am such a nice person :)

November 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. I see you've been asked before to use edit summaries, yet you still make tons of edits that don't include them at all, which can be particularly worrisome when making major changes to a page. Please remember to use these in the future as it helps people get a better sense of what you're trying to do. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:36, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Infobox dates

Hi, when updating infobox stats you should update the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats, by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 01:31, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep this in mind. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to New York City FC does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. You don't seem to care though. I just saw an editor blocked for repeatedly ignoring this. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, PsychopathicAssassin. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Messi fans (and above all - Black Kite) will now block anyone of the hundreds of millions over the world who would edit Cristiano ronaldo's page to the obvious statement that Ronaldo has a fact! considered widely as the greatest. i want to thank you personally for being an objective, honest, and mature editor and trying to clear this obvious truth while so much Messi fans fight against it because they can't deal with reality (not that it matters what they edit lol, in reality Ronaldo is widely considered as one of the candidates to be the best of all time and everything else...well...is meaningless anyway).

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	I really appreciate u edited Cristiano Ronaldo's page where it clearly needed (one of the best > the best). Please make sure no one changes it back, because there's no logical reason. Es1989111 (talk) 05:07, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think we need some higher intervention on this edit warring. they (Black Kite, Flannery) cannot control this page and decides for anyone!

May 2018

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent edit-warring at Christiano Ronaldo against the findings of an RfC, as you did at Christiano Ronaldo. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 09:24, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brad Stevens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rebuild (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited No Way Out (Puff Daddy album), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages George Clinton and Christopher Martin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Drake (musician). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Also, please do not improperly use WP:MINOR edits as you did in this edit. Lapadite (talk) 15:12, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing as you did at Drake (musician).

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. I see you're in a slow edit war with multiple editors about the lead in the Drake article. The 4-paragraph version presented by the first editor and restored by others is preferred. Take your concerns to the talk page, if you want. LivinRealGüd (talk) 14:10, 21 June 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited New York Knicks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Knox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent editing history at Kids See Ghosts (album) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Alduin2000 (talk) 23:23, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Drake (musician). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 22:18, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Drake (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page In My Feelings (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please do not assume ownership of articles as you did at Drake (musician). If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Don't tell users "refrain from editing the page again." Cornerstonepicker (talk) 23:41, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Drake (musician). Binksternet (talk) 16:03, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You have been engaging in a long pattern of disruptive editing for years, including repeated edit warring, obnoxious insults, copyright violations, and use of unreliable sources. Despite several blocks and many warnings, your behavior has not changed. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 02:35, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "RIAA Adds Digital Streams To Historic Gold & Platinum Awards". Recording Industry Association of America. May 9, 2013. Archived from the original on October 19, 2014. Retrieved May 9, 2013. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

[2] Mansell, Henry (February 20, 2016). "Hip Hop Single Sales: Rihanna, G-Eazy & Future". HipHopDX. Retrieved February 21, 2016.

[1]

[1]