User talk:Punditah

Chronology of librarians of Alexandria

A tag has been placed on Chronology of librarians of Alexandria, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Arx Fortis (talk) 08:05, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1. I did not delete the article. I only marked it as possibly meriting deletion. An administrator makes the final decision on whether or not it gets deleted. I am not an administrator. Apparently, an administrator agreed that the article should be deleted and did so. If you felt the article should not have been deleted, you could have added a {{hangon}} tag to the article and your comments on the talk page would have been reviewed. Feel free to add the article back, but be sure you include an introductory sentence or paragraph and cite reliable sources. Sources are important to avoid the appearance of original research.

2. Please be civil and keep your comments focused on the article or issue-at-hand. Do not resort to name-calling and hostile personal attacks as you did in your post on my talk page. You should have assumed good faith. ++Arx Fortis (talk) 15:14, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Apology accepted. To see who deleted the page, click on the red-link "Chronology of librarians of Alexandria" above. On that page, you will see a box labeled "Notice: You are re-creating a page that was deleted." The Administrator who deleted will be listed there. If you wish to contact him/her, please remember to be civil. Hostility is rarely fruitful on Wikipedia. Cheers. ++Arx Fortis (talk) 15:30, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here the talk which was on the talk page of Arx_Fortis:

Arx_Fortis, You are a vandal. I have studied Classical Philology, and thought a chronology of the librarians of Alexandria to be usefull as well as necessary. I left it open to You (mentione in the talk page of that article) as to whether there should be a separate article for that or that table should be included in the article Library of Alexandria. Do You think I wrote that table just that You deleted that page? Why don t You stick to Your NC and US, which You love, and interfere in countries You obviously have no idea about? I have come to understand, why academic people usually have a certain opinion about Wikipedia. Bye, Wikipedia! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Punditah (talk • contribs) 11:39, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I left a reply on your talk page. ++Arx Fortis (talk) 15:16, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I apologise. Well, how could i have known that it was not You who removed that page, since all information was deleted when that page was deleted? Was there a way to see that? (Btw, I had added a hangon-tag to the article as well as a detailed explanation that the table concerned could be a seperate article or not etc.) Punditah (talk) 11:09, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I left a new reply on your talk page. ++Arx Fortis (talk) 15:30, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Punditah 14:50, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Tentinator 16:07, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have deleted two links: one from OSCav to Open-source hardware. There is no reason for such a link, as "OSCav" is not mentioned in the article. OSCav means open source compressed air vehicle. The other link is from C,mm,n to Open-source hardware. There is no reason for such a link, as "C,mm,n" is not mentioned in the article but in Open-source car. Please redelete, what you have undone, or correct the links to Open-souce car as described by me. Punditah (talk) 12:58, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm McGeddon. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Nestlé without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! McGeddon (talk) 15:00, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm Doug Weller. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Khruner that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I suggest you apologise. Khruner is in no sense a vandal, he works well with other editors (not just one person), and going in aggressively the way you did is not going to help you. And those of us with large watch lists end up doing a lot of reverting vandalism. Doug Weller (talk) 18:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]