Jump to content

User talk:RGluesen22

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, RGluesen22, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! LadyofShalott 04:49, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your message at Requests for feedback

[edit]
You can find live help on Wikipedia's
help chat
Hello, RGluesen22. I replied to your request for feedback.
Best regards, Tkotc (talk) 02:22, 12 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sheila A. Robinson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.execwomeningov.org/events-and-activities/193. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 23:44, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because it has been thoroughly rewritten to avoid any appearance or actual copyright infringement, while still maintaining its informational integrity --RGluesen22 (talk) 04:09, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • According to this there are still some phrases that a bit close to the original. I don't think this is a clear candidate for speedy deletion under copyvio, but there is still a little bit of work to be done to clean it up. SilkTork ✔Tea time 10:44, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks for the feedback. I've made some more edits, but there are a few items that were flagged (for example: "7th on 6th fashions shows" and "minority person of the year") that are the actual names of the events and/or awards. Trying to rewrite them would be like trying to rewrite "the NAACP Image Awards" or "the Academy Awards". Let me know how you think it best to proceed. Thanks. -- Rich


Status and Advice

[edit]

As reviewing administrator, I deleted it, but primarily for the promotionalism. The article seems clearly designed to enhance her career, not to provide neutral encyclopedic information about it. The overall tone is enthusiastic, not neutral: "to help people who were experiencing obstacles and challenges similar to those she faced throughout her career" is pure advertising. Many of the career details are unverifiable except as she gives them. Promotional writing is writing to present what the subject wants to say about themselves; encyclopedic writing is what the general reader might want to know. I am also concerned about notability. One of the top 50 minority women in a particular sector of a particular industry is not necessarily much of an indicator of importance. The other awards are local. I would advise waiting until her first book is published and has obtained substantial reviews from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or reader comments. You might also want to consider writing an article about her magazine, if there are sufficient food references.

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Diversity Woman for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diversity Woman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diversity Woman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mayoticks (talk) 17:53, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maria Sten, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Sky. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]