User talk:R stasey

Please don’t bite me, I’m a newbie!

I’m a university student in a Wikipedia Education class, and I’m currently learning how to contribute to Wikipedia.
I am approaching my subject in good faith.

If you have any concerns or questions, my tutor’s name is R stasey (talk · contribs). Thanks!

A kitten for you!

thanks for being an awesome tutor!

Hakaboy8 (talk) 04:37, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

thanks for being an awesome tutor!

Hakaboy8 (talk) 04:37, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Thanks for being such an awesome tutor! You've been super helpful and I really appreciate it! One of my fave class for sure! :) Tasrockstar (talk) 04:41, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A brownie for you!

Thanks for the goat and for being an amazing tutor! Really appreciate your patience with us. Bentan098 (talk) 05:35, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some bubble tea for you!

thanks for being such an amazing tutor and for all the help along the way!¡¡ really appreciate it!¡¡ Wik.editor645 (talk) 11:07, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Flightless (record label) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:42, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Keep up the good work! Please accept this kitten as a token of encouragement.

Sun jess (talk) 05:43, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

independent sourcing

Hi,

Just a heads up about this section. It appears to be one of your students? In sum: They've done a lot of work on the page and there's nothing too egregious in the article. The main reason I'm leaving a message for you is that the main problem with the article might be an issue that could be addressed class-wide. Namely, that Wikipedia wants independent sourcing in almost all cases (there are exceptions). We generally don't consider articles which rely on official sites, press releases, interviews with the subject, etc. to be compatible with neutral point of view, because subjects cannot be presumed to be neutral sources about themselves. Even if worded in a way that's neutral, extensive material sourced this way winds up creating a problem of WP:WEIGHT and gives it a promotional tone. FYI. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 17:59, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I'll address it with the student and keep it in mind for the future. I appreciate the helpful comment! R stasey (talk) 01:04, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]