User talk:RadioDemon

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of TotalTruthTeller24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:55, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NinjaRobotPirate

Alright, I want to know what our problem here is, because my grandmother just died and I am having a pretty terrible day, so this is just the cherry on top of it. I contribute positively to Wikipedia! You delete pages because of the Creator alone, regardless of whether or not they are noteworthy. There was nothing wrong with Erma (comic), enough references have been found for it to be deemed notable (there was even a Dread Central article on it today) or those family tree template pages in terms of quality. I want nothing more but to improve Wikipedia, and have been doing so since before I was 12 years old. And that was what, seven, eight years ago? Please tell me why. RadioDemon (talk) 18:07, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: RadioDemon (talk) 18:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When one of your accounts is blocked, you're not allowed to edit English Wikipedia from any other accounts. Any edits you make while evading a block can be reverted on sight, and any articles you create can be unilaterally deleted. If you want to edit Wikipedia, you must stop using sock puppets. Since User:TotalTruthTeller24 is banned, you'll have to appeal the ban through the instructions at WP:UNBAN. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:25, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have regularly blocked me for using a single account at once, hardly sockpuppeteering. The problem is that those appeals are almost universally unsuccessful, and was unsuccessful for me the one time I did try it. I am not actually intentionally breaking any rules when I edit with single accounts, and do not make any contradictory edits with multiple accounts (when I did when I was younger I was a literal child who didn’t know what they were doing; while I still technically am a child I do know what I’m doing now). If I have no hope of appeal, and I know I can genuinely improve Wikipedia (which I do, and have in the past), then what choice do I have but to make a new account unconnected from all previous ones? If there is not a realistic possibility of the original account being redeemed, and I do have the best of intentions, then what else can I do? I really would like to know. RadioDemon (talk) 22:32, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Machiko Noguchi.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Machiko Noguchi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Erma.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Erma.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Monika DDLC.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Monika DDLC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:GeorgeJungle.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GeorgeJungle.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. MIDI (talk) 19:22, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]